journal article·2015-06

Nonlinear Finite Element Analyses of FRP-Strengthened Concrete Slabs under Fixed-Point Cyclic Loading

Xiaodan Teng, Y. X. Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

A finite element model denoted as FEM-C is developed in this paper for prediction of structural responses of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)–strengthened concrete slabs under fixed-point cyclic load. First, a finite element model named as FEM-S, which is of the same geometry as the FEM-C model, is developed and validated for analyses of structural behavior of FRP-strengthened concrete slabs under static load. Then, the finite element model is extended for analyses of structural behavior of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) slabs under fixed-point cyclic loading in the FEM-C model, with degradations of material properties of concrete, steel reinforcement, and FRP due to cyclic loading taken into account. Geometric and material nonlinearity and bond-slip effects between FRP and concrete are included in these models. The finite element (FE) models are validated through numerical examples and demonstrated to be effective and accurate for modeling the structural behavior of FRP-strengthened RC slabs under static and cyclic loading. The FEM-C model can also model the bond-slip behavior between the FRP and concrete well. Furthermore, the effects of parameters on the structural performance of the FRP-strengthened concrete slab under fixed-point cyclic loading, including different types and widths of FRPs, are investigated using the FEM-C model. It is learned that the computed central deflection of the CFRP-strengthened slab is approximately 18% less than that of the GFRP-strengthened slab. In addition, it is found that the RC slab strengthened with 150 mm wide FRP strips performs better than that with 102 mm wide FRP strips, with approximately 8% less central deflection and 10% less slip.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Engineering and Information Technology, Univ. of New South Wales Canberra, Northcott Dr., ACT 2600, Australia.

Senior Lecturer, School of Engineering and Information Technology, Univ. of New South Wales Canberra, Northcott Dr., ACT 2600, Australia (corresponding author).

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.04.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2008.04.002 ↗
2. ANSYS 13.0 [Computer software]. Canonsburg PA ANSYS.
3. A method of predicting crack widths and deflections for fatigue loading
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(784)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(784) ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.07.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.07.005 ↗
7. Dai J. G. Saito Y. Ueda T. and Sato Y. (2005). “Static and fatigue bond characteristics of interfaces between CFRP sheets and frost damage experienced concrete.” Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures C. K. Shield J. P. Busel S. L. Walkup and D. D. Gremel eds. American Concrete Institute (ACI) Farmington Hills MI 1515–1530.
8. Bond of fiber-reinforced polymer laminates to concrete
9. Dowling N. E. · 1993
10. Fiber-reinforced polymer strengthening of two-way slabs
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(619)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(619) ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000017710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000177 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.035 ↗
14. Harris B. Gathercole N. Reiter H. and Adam T. (1996). “Constant-stress of fatigue response and life prediction for carbon fiber composite.” Progress in durability analysis of composite systems A. H. Cardon H. Fukuda and K. Reifsnider eds. Taylor and Francis London 63–74.
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:3(246)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:3(246) ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(419)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(419) ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000008110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000081 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00011-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00011-4 ↗
19. Longworth J. Bizindavyi L. Wight R. G. and Erki M. A. (2004). “Prestressed CFRP sheets for strengthening two-way slabs in flexure.” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures (CD-Rom) M. El-Badry and L. Dunasazegi eds. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Calgary Canada.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000028610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000286 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.014 ↗
22. 10.3151/jact.4.44510.3151/jact.4.445 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453) ↗
24. Prediction of fatigue life of reinforced concrete slabs of highway bridges
25. Monti M. Renzelli M. and Luciani P. (2003). “FRP adhesion in uncracked and cracked concrete zones.” Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures World Scientific Publications Singapore 183–192.10.1142/9789812704863_0015 ↗
26. Bond behaviour between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete
27. Neubauer U. and Rostasy F. S. (1999). “Bond failure of concrete fiber reinforced polymer plates at inclined cracks-experiments and fracture mechanics model.” Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures ACI Farmington Hills MI 369–82.
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000017310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000173 ↗
29. 10.1139/l99-02610.1139/l99-026 ↗
30. Fatigue analysis of RC slabs and repaired RC slabs based on crack bridging degradation concept
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:5(455)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:5(455) ↗
32. Savioa M. Farracuti B. and Mazzotti D. (2003). “Non-linear bond–slip law for FRP concrete interface.” Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures World Scientific Publications Singapore 163–72.10.1142/9789812704863_0013 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.08.00610.1016/j.engstruct.2004.08.006 ↗
34. 10.1680/stbu.156.1.51.3788010.1680/stbu.156.1.51.37880 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.040 ↗
36. 10.1260/13694330332241920510.1260/136943303322419205 ↗
37. Experimental/analytical study on interfacial fracture energy and fracture propagation along FRP-concrete interface
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.06.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2004.06.001 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000013810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000138 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.11.00610.1016/j.engstruct.2003.11.006 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.02610.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.026 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.finel.2007.05.00210.1016/j.finel.2007.05.002 ↗