journal article·2009-06

Bond Behavior of Near-Surface Mounted FRP Strips Bonded to Modern Clay Brick Masonry Prisms: Influence of Strip Orientation and Compression Perpendicular to the Strip

Robert B. Petersen, Mark J. Masia, Rudolf Seracino

Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper the results of 18 pull tests performed on clay brick masonry prisms strengthened with near-surface mounted carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips are presented. The pull tests were designed to add to the existing database and investigate variables significant to masonry construction. FRP was bonded to solid clay brick masonry; FRP aligned both perpendicular and parallel to the bed joint; and in the case of FRP reinforcement aligned parallel to the bed joint, compression applied perpendicular to the strip was used to simulate vertical compression load in masonry walls. Results including bond strength, critical bond length, and the local bond-slip relationship are presented as well as a discussion on the effect of the new variables on these results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability, School of Engineering, The Univ. of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia (corresponding author).

Senior Lecturer, Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability, School of Engineering, The Univ. of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7533.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM. (1993). “Standard test method for diagonal tension (shear) in masonry assemblages.” ASTM E 519-93 Philadelphia.
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.08.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2006.08.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.021 ↗
4. Petersen R. B. Masia M. J. and Seracino R. (2008). “Experimental verification of finite element model to predict the shear behaviour of NSM FRP strengthened masonry walls.” Proc. 14th Int. Brick and Block Masonry Conf. Sydney Australia Paper No. 121.
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:2(160)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:2(160) ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(401)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(401) ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(62)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(62) ↗
8. Standards Australia. (2001). “Masonry structures: Appendix D—Method of test for flexural strength.” AS3700-2001 ASI Sydney Australia.
9. Standards Australia. (2003). “Masonry units segmental pavers and flags-Methods of test. Method 15: Determining lateral modulus of rupture.” AS/NZS 4456.15:2003 ASI Sydney Australia.
10. Willis C. R. Yang Q. Seracino R. and Griffith M. C. (2008). “Bond behavior of FRP-to-clay brick masonry joints.” Eng. Struct.ENSTDF0141-0296 submitted.