journal article·2023-10Open access

Influence of Matrix and Cohesive Material Law Characteristics on the Tensile and Bond Behavior of FRCM Systems

Eloisa Fazzi, Giulia Misseri, Luisa Rovero

Abstract

This study proposes numerical modeling of fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composite systems in direct shear (DST) or tensile (DTT) tests with any setup. In the interfacial fracture theory framework, the nonlinear differential problem is treated through the finite difference method and the incremental solution to the equilibrium in terms of displacements is found by updating the secant stiffness of the cohesive material law. Relying on independent solutions which consider the system in the different phases since the initial condition, without and with fractures, and reconnecting the related solutions, a new procedure for the construction of the load slip diagram of DTT is implemented, allowing estimation of load drops and stiffness degradation caused by cracks opening. The model is benchmarked on results available in the literature and experimental tests carried out by the authors. A thorough parametric analysis of DTT highlights the influence on the response of matrix tensile strength and its distribution along the reinforcement. In particular, it is shown that the ratio between bond stress and mortar tensile strength can determine bilinear or trilinear diagrams and that the position of cracks widely influences the load and slip capacity of the system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials and Structures Division, Dept. of Architecture, Univ. of Florence, Piazza Brunelleschi, 6, Florence 50121, Italy. ORCID: .

Materials and Structures Division, Dept. of Architecture, Univ. of Florence, Piazza Brunelleschi, 6, Florence 50121, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: .

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2020. Guide to design and construction of externally bonded fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix and steel-reinforced grout systems for repair and strengthening of concrete structures. ACI 549.4 R-20. Farmington Hills MI: ACI.
2. Alecci, V., S. Barducci, M. De Stefano, L. Rovero, G. Stipo, S. Galassi, and R. Luciano. 2021. “Reliability of different test setups and influence of mortar mixture on the fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix-to-brick bond response.” J. Test. Eval. 49 (6): 4476–4495. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE2111-EB.10.1520/JTE20200656 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000059810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000598 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.023 ↗
5. Arboleda, D., F. G. Carozzi, A. Nanni, and C. Poggi. 2016. “Testing procedures for the uniaxial tensile characterization of fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (3): 04015063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000626.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000626 ↗
6. Banholzer, B., W. Brameshuber, and W. Jung. 2005. “Analytical simulation of pull-out tests—The direct problem.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 27 (1): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.01.006.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.01.006 ↗
7. 10.1617/s11527-006-9140-x10.1617/s11527-006-9140-x ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000098510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000985 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11164110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111641 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11365510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113655 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.04810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.048 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11606210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116062 ↗
13. Carozzi, F. G., et al. 2017. “Experimental investigation of tensile and bond properties of carbon-FRCM composites for strengthening masonry elements.” Composites, Part B 128: 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.018.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.018 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.033 ↗
16. CNR (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricecrche). 2014. Istruzioni per la progettazione l’esecuzione ed il controllo di interventi di consolidamento statico mediante l’utilizzo di compositi fibrorinforzati. CNR-DT 200r1/2013. CNR: Rome.
17. CNR (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricecrche). 2018. Istruzioni per la Progettazione l’Esecuzione ed il Controllo di Interventi di Consolidamento Statico mediante l’utilizzo di Compositi Fibrorinforzati a matrice inorganica. CNR-DT 215/2018. CNR: Rome.
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.07410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.074 ↗
19. Dalalbashi, A., B. Ghiassi, and D. V. Oliveira. 2021. “A multi-level investigation on the mechanical response of trm-strengthened masonry.” Mater. Struct. 54 (6): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01817-4.10.1617/s11527-021-01817-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.014 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.04110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.041 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.052 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000088610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000886 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.024 ↗
28. Fazzi, E., G. Misseri, and L. Rovero. 2023. “Experimental, analytical, and numerical investigations on bond behaviour of basalt TRM systems.” Int. J. Masonry Res. Innov. 8 (2–3): 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2023.129574.10.1504/IJMRI.2023.129574 ↗
29. 10.4028/p-6848f410.4028/p-6848f4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.038 ↗
31. Focacci, F., T. D’Antino, and C. Carloni. 2020. “The role of the fiber–matrix interfacial properties on the tensile behavior of FRCM coupons.” Constr. Build. Mater. 265: 120263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120263.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120263 ↗
32. 10.4028/p-5rwvlo10.4028/p-5rwvlo ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000122310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001223 ↗
34. Focacci F. T. D’Antino and C. Carloni. 2022c. “Tensile tests of FRCM coupons: The influence of the fiber-matrix bond properties.” In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering edited by A. Ilki M. Ispir and P. Inci. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 198 2008–2019. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-88166-5_173 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.03410.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.034 ↗
36. Grande E. B. Ghiassi and M. Imbimbo. 2019. “Theoretical and fe models for the study of the bond behavior of FRCM systems.” In Numerical modeling of masonry and historical structures 685–712. Amsterdam Netherlands: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-102439-3.00019-1 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.010 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.08.00410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.08.004 ↗
39. Kouris, L. A. S., and T. C. Triantafillou. 2018. “State-of-the-art on strengthening of masonry structures with textile reinforced mortar (trm).” Constr. Build. Mater. 188: 1221–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.039.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.039 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000088210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000882 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.028 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.003 ↗
43. Milani, G., and E. Grande. 2020. “Simple bisection procedure in quickly convergent explicit ode solver to numerically analyze FRCM strengthening systems.” Composites, Part B 199: 108322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108322.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108322 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12557610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125576 ↗
45. Misseri, G., L. Rovero, and S. Galassi. 2021. “Analytical modelling bond behaviour of polybenzoxazole (PBO) and glass fibre reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) systems coupled with cement and gypsum matrixes: Effect of the cohesive material law (CML) shape.” Composites, Part B 223: 109090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109090.10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109090 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.054 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.06.00710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.06.007 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11510010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115100 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11753910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117539 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.10658210.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106582 ↗
51. Peled, A., and A. Bentur. 1998. “Reinforcement of cementitious matrices by warp knitted fabrics.” Mater. Struct. 31 (8): 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481536.10.1007/BF02481536 ↗
52. Rovero, L., S. Galassi, and G. Misseri. 2020. “Experimental and analytical investigation of bond behavior in glass fiber-reinforced composites based on gypsum and cement matrices.” Composites, Part B 194: 108051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108051.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108051 ↗
53. Saidi, M., and A. Gabor. 2020. “Experimental analysis of the tensile behaviour of textile reinforced cementitious matrix composites using distributed fibre optic sensing (DFOS) technology.” Constr. Build. Mater. 230: 117027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117027.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117027 ↗
54. 10.1617/s11527-008-9422-610.1617/s11527-008-9422-6 ↗
55. Soranakom, C., and B. Mobasher. 2010a. “Modeling of tension stiffening in reinforced cement composites: Part I. Theoretical modeling.” Mater. Struct. 43 (9): 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9594-8.10.1617/s11527-010-9594-8 ↗
56. 10.1617/s11527-010-9593-910.1617/s11527-010-9593-9 ↗
57. Truong, V. D., and D. J. Kim. 2021. “A review paper on direct tensile behavior and test methods of textile reinforced cementitious composites.” Compos. Struct. 263: 113661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113661.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113661 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11468910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114689 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11464310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114643 ↗