Ductile Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams Retrofitted with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Plates
Source abstract
Abstract
For reinforced concrete beams retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plates, an analytical method is derived for determining the allowable plate area to achieve a targeted value of ductility. Nonlinear models for concrete and reinforcement are applied, and the effects of concrete confinement and spalling and of FRP plate rupture are considered. The derivation of equilibrium and compatibility equations for a rectangular cross section is presented, and the solution to the nonlinear equation for determining the allowable plate area is demonstrated with examples. Analytical results are compared with numerical and experimental data reported in the literature. Subsequently a simplified version of the method is derived, based on regression analysis, to relate the curvature ductility to the FRP plate ratio. It is noted that additional conditions need to be checked to ensure ductile performance, such as local failure of the concrete layer between tension reinforcement and FRP plate or debonding of the plate itself.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Associate Researcher, Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of Interior, 13th Floor, No. 333, Tunhua S. Rd., Sect. 2, Taipei, Taiwan.
Senior Project Engineer, T.Y. Lin International, 825 Battery St., San Francisco, CA.
Project Manager, T.Y. Lin Taiwan Consulting Engineers, Room 1202, No. 136, Sect. 3, Jen-Ai Rd., Taipei, Taiwan.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. American Concrete Institute (ACI). ( 1971). “Building code requirements for reinforced concrete.” ACI 318-71 Detroit.
2. American Concrete Institute (ACI). ( 1999a). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318M-99 Farmington Hills Mich.
3. American Concrete Institute (ACI). ( 1999b). “Commentary.” ACI 318RM-99 Farmington Hills Mich.
4. American Concrete Institute (ACI). ( 2002). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-02 Farmington Hills Mich.
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3434)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3434) ↗
6. Strength and ductility of reinforced concrete beams externally reinforced with carbon fiber fabric
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(102)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:2(102) ↗
8. Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering (CICHE). ( 1998). “Reinforced concrete design code and commentary.” CICHE 401-86 Taipei Taiwan (in Chinese).
9. 10.1061/JSDEAG.000295710.1061/JSDEAG.0002957 ↗
10. Prediction of failure load of R/C beams strengthened with FRP plate due to stress concentration at the plate end
11. Ductility of doubly reinforced concrete beam sections
12. External reinforcement of concrete beams using fiber reinforced plastics
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3417)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3417) ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(158)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(158) ↗
15. Standard Association of New Zealand (SANZ). ( 1995). “Concrete structures standard.” NZS 3101 Wellington New Zealand.
16. Swamy R.N. and Jones R. ( 1991). “Plate bonding technology—The painless technique of structural rehabilitation.” Proc. ACI Int. Conf. on Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures and Innovations in Design Farmington Hills Mich. 1385–1405.
17. Flexural behavior of beams with confinement