Seismic Behavior of Square and Circular Concrete Columns with GFRP Reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents results from tests on seven reinforced concrete square columns under simulated seismic loading and demonstrates their satisfactory behavior even when axial load is high. All seven specimens were confined by glass fiber–reinforced polymer reinforcement (GFRP) rectilinear ties, while five specimens were reinforced with steel longitudinal bars and two with GFRP longitudinal bars. The results showed that irrespective of the longitudinal bar type, GFRP confinement effectively improved the seismic resistance of columns. The difference in the type of the longitudinal bars resulted in significant changes in column behavior. A comparison was made between these test specimens and earlier circular columns from literature, and the confinement effectiveness of the GFRP rectilinear ties and circular spirals was evaluated. Lateral GFRP was found to have a greater influence on the flexural strength enhancement of columns with GFRP longitudinal bars versus steel longitudinal bars. Results indicate that available methods for predicting flexural strength enhancement due to confinement invariably miscalculated the true strength enhancement by a substantial margin, particularly when GFRP longitudinal bars are used. A new model for predicting the flexural strength enhancement of square and circular columns confined by lateral GFRP is proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4 (corresponding author). ORCID: .
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 2018
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000043810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000438 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000005010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000050 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000063710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000637 ↗
5. Bae S. 2005. “Seismic performance of full-scale reinforced concrete columns.” Ph.D. thesis Dept. of Civil Engineering Univ. of Texas at Austin.
6. Plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:9(999)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:9(999) ↗
8. Lumped-plasticity models for performance simulation of bridge columns
9. 10.13034/cysj-2014-00310.13034/cysj-2014-003 ↗
10. 10.1139/l93-03110.1139/l93-031 ↗
11. 10.1061/JSDEAG.000150410.1061/JSDEAG.0001504 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:4(363)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:4(363) ↗
13. Behavior of full-scale glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns under axial load
14. 10.14359/5170098510.14359/51700985 ↗
15. Eccentric behavior of full-scale reinforced concrete columns with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars and ties
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000073410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000734 ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000067010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000670 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.21910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.219 ↗
19. Kharal Z. 2018. “Seismic response of square columns confined with GFRP rectilinear ties.” Ph.D. thesis Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering Univ. of Toronto.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000088410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000884 ↗
21. Kobayashi K. and T. Fujisaki. 1995. “Compressive behavior of FRP reinforcement in non-prestressed concrete members.” In Proc. 2nd Int. RILEM Symp. on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures 267–274. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.
22. Liu J. 2013. “Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns.” Ph.D. thesis Dept. of Civil Engineering Univ. of Toronto.
23. FRP-confined circular columns under simulated seismic loads
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
25. NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) International. 2013. “Corrosion central industries and technologies highways and bridges.” Accessed March 30 2016. http://www.nace.org/Corrosion-Central/Industries/Highways-and-Bridges.
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.025 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000035710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000357 ↗
28. 10.1002/978047017283410.1002/9780470172834 ↗
29. 10.1002/978047017284110.1002/9780470172841 ↗
30. Behavior and performance of GFRP reinforced concrete columns with various types of stirrups10.1155/2015/237231 ↗
31. Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading
32. Schöck ComBAR. 2013. “SchöckbauteileGmBH.” Accessed August 20 2016. http://www.schoeck-combar.com/upload/documents/flashbook/comb/combar_glasfaserbewehrung/technical_information_schoeck_combar_13-11-14_3075/index.html#18.
33. Confined concrete columns with stubs
34. Strength and ductility of tied concrete columns10.1061/JSDEAG.0005416 ↗
35. 10.1061/JSDEAG.000610010.1061/JSDEAG.0006100 ↗
36. Glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced circular columns under simulated seismic loads
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000077410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000774 ↗
38. Concrete columns reinforced longitudinally and transversally with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars
39. Behaviour of concentrically loaded fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns with varying reinforcement types and ratios
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1825)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1825) ↗
41. Xue W. X. Hu and Z. Fang. 2014. “Experimental studies of GFRP reinforced concrete columns under static eccentric loading.” In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE 2014). Kingston ON Canada: International Institute for FRP in Construction.