Behavior and Modeling of Concrete Confined with FRP Composites of Large Deformability
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the behavior of concrete confined by fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) jackets with a large rupture strain (LRS). The FRP composites considered herein are formed by embedding polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers in a suitable epoxy resin matrix. The PEN and PET fibers are usually made from recycled materials (e.g., PET bottles) and have a strain capacity greater than 5%. They are ideal for use in seismic retrofit applications where increases in ductility and energy absorption capacity are of prime concern. The present study has two specific objectives: (1) to develop a good understanding of the compressive stress-strain behavior of concrete confined with LRS FRP; and (2) to examine whether existing confinement models developed for conventional FRPs are applicable to LRS FRPs. As the existing models have been developed and verified mainly based on test data for CFRP and GFRP, which have a jacket hoop rupture strain of less than 2%, their accuracy in the hoop/lateral strain range beyond 2% is unclear. Results presented in this paper indicate that the two LRS FRPs made from PEN and PET fibers possess a bilinear tensile stress-strain relationship, which has a significant effect on the axial compressive stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined concrete. A recent confinement model for conventional FRPs is compared with the present test results, indicating that the model significantly overestimates the ultimate axial strain. A modified version of the model is then presented to provide more accurate predictions of the test results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China (corresponding author).
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China.
Chair Professor of Structural Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.011 ↗
2. ASTM. (2008a). “Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.” D638-08 West Conshohocken PA.
3. ASTM. (2008b). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” D3039M-08 West Conshohoken PA.
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.00210.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.002 ↗
6. Chun S. S. and Park H. C. (2002). “Load carrying capacity and ductility of RC columns confined by carbon fiber reinforced polymer.” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructure Omnipress Madison WI.
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000011510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000115 ↗
8. Dai J. G. and Ueda T. (2012). “Strength and deformability of concrete members wrapped with fibre-reinforced polymer composites with a large rupture strain.” Chapter 14 Innovative materials and techniques in concrete construction: ACES workshop M. N. Fardis ed. Springer New York 225–241.10.1007/978-94-007-1997-2_14 ↗
9. Confinement model for axially loaded concrete confined by circular fiber-reinforced polymer tubes
10. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.005 ↗
11. Behavior and modeling of concrete subject to variable confining pressure
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.01010.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.010 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:6(539)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:6(539) ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-010-4999-x10.1007/s10853-010-4999-x ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000002910.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000029 ↗
17. An innovative form of reinforcement for concrete columns using advanced composites
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(332)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(332) ↗
20. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199707)2:3<237::AID-CFM32>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199707)2:3<237::AID-CFM32>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-310.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(825)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(825) ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(143)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(143) ↗
24. Teng J. G. · 2002
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(201)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(201) ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000001210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000012 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1713)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1713) ↗
28. Stress-strain characteristics of concrete columns externally confined with advanced fiber composite sheets
29. Ueda T. (2009). “Structural performance of members strengthened by FRP jacketing with high fracturing strain.” Proc. 2nd Asia-Pacific Conf. on FRP in Structures (APFIS 2009) Seoul 19–28.
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(139)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(139) ↗
31. 10.1177/073168440303543010.1177/0731684403035430 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.020 ↗