journal article·2023-02

Application of CFRP Tendons to Novel Connections of Precast Concrete Deck Panels: Experiments and Analytical Models

Menghan Hu, Zhenlei Jia, Qiang Han, Yulei Bai, Chiyu Jiao, Peiheng Long

Publisher page

Abstract

Carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendons are gaining significant interest in the construction industry owing to their high corrosion resistance. Full-depth precast concrete deck panels (PCDPs) with connections provide advantages for accelerating the construction of superstructures, such as minimizing traffic interruption and improving construction quality. The influences of the connection configuration on the mechanical properties, convenience of construction, and economic cost of PCDPs are the focus issues to be concerned. The poor durability of connection materials also hinders the practical application of full-depth PCDPs. In this paper, a novel high-performance connection for PCDPs was proposed, taking ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) and CFRP strand as grout material and post-tensioned tendon, respectively. The high-performance connection has high strength and durability. Four-point bending experiments were conducted to investigate the flexural performance of PCDPs with the proposed novel connection, including failure mode, moment–deflection curve, capacity, ductility, and working mechanism. Moreover, the numerical simulations were carried out to evaluate the impacts of parameters on the flexural capacity in Abaqus software. An improved analytical model was put forward to predict the balanced CFRP tendon ratio and flexural capacity of PCDPs. The results show that it is ductile-control for the failure mode of PCDPs with high-performance connections. The flexural capacity is significantly improved with the increased quantity of welded studs, initial tendon stress, concrete strength, and anchorage spacing. The proposed connections could effectively promote the behavior and durability of PCDPs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Scholar, School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing Univ. of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.

Doctor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China (corresponding author).

Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

Professor, Ancient Bridge Research Institute, Beijing Univ. of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China; Multi-Functional Shaking Tables Laboratory, Beijing Univ. of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.

Professor, School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing Univ. of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
3. 10.15554/pcij.03012001.76.8710.15554/pcij.03012001.76.87 ↗
4. CABP (China Architecture & Building Press). 2012. Standard for test method of concrete structures. GB/T 50152-2012. Beijing: CABP.
5. CABP (China Architecture & Building Press). 2015. Code for design of concrete structures. GB 50010-2010. Beijing: CABP.
6. CABP (China Architecture & Building Press). 2019. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties. GB/T 50081-2019. Beijing: CABP.
7. CBMP (China Building Material Press). 2018. Fundamental characteristics and test methods of ultra-high-performance concrete. T/CCPA 7-2018. Beijing: CBMP.
8. CCP (China Communications Press). 2018. Specifications for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts. JTG 3362-2018. Beijing: CCP.
9. CEB-FIP (European committee for concrete-Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte). 1991. CEB-FIP model code 1990. Paris: Thomas Telford.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000030110.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000301 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000030510.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000305 ↗
12. Eligehausen, R., R. Mallée, and J. F. Silva. 2006. Anchorage in concrete construction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000015110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000151 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11430710.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114307 ↗
15. Jiao, C. J., W. Sun, G. G. Qin, Y. M. Zhang, and J. Y. Jiang. 2004. “Constitutive equation of SFRHSC under uniaxial compression.” [In Chinese.] J. Southeast Univ. 34 (3): 366–369.
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.04810.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.048 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000006710.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000067 ↗
19. Ma, Z. G. J., Q. Cao, C. E. Chapman, E. G. Burdette, and C. E. French. 2012. “Longitudinal joint details with tight bend diameter U-bars.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (6): 815–824.
20. Nilforoush, R., M. Nilsson, L. Elfgren, J. Ozbolt, J. Hofmann, and R. Eligehausen. 2017. “Influence of surface reinforcement, member thickness and cracked concrete on tensile capacity of anchor bolts.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (6): 1543–1556.
21. 10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-16610.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.09110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.091 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000023810.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000238 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000017310.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000173 ↗
25. 10.15554/pcij.03011989.104.12010.15554/pcij.03011989.104.120 ↗
26. SIMULIA. 2010. ABAQUS 6.10 analysis user’s manual 6.10-EF. Providence, RI: SIMULIA. (Computer software).
27. SPC (Standards Press of China). 2010. Metallic materials-tensile testing- part 1: Method of test at room temperature. GB/T 228.1-2010. Beijing: SPC.
28. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.00310.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.00110.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.001 ↗
30. UDOT (Utah Department of Transportation). 2008. Full depth precast concrete deck panel standard drawings. Salt Lake City, UT: UDOT.
31. Wang, Z. H., X. L. Du, and J. D. Zhan. 2012. “The flexural capacity of concrete beams prestressed with bonded and/or unbonded FRP tendons.” Eng. Mech. 29 (3): 67–74.
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000090810.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000908 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000044010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000440 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.036 ↗
35. Yuan, W. Y., Q. Han, Y. L. Bai, X. L. Du, and Q. L. Liu. 2022. “A unified confinement model of FRP-wrapped concrete cylinder.” [In Chinese.] China J. Highway Transp. 35 (2): 146–157.
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000147510.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001475 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.015 ↗