journal article·2014-12

Mechanical Performance of the Wet-Bond Interface between FRP Plates and Cast-in-Place Concrete

Pu Zhang, Gang Wu, Hong Zhu, Shao-ping Meng, Zhi-shen Wu

Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanical performance of the bond between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) plates and cast-in-place concrete (referred to as the wet-bond interface) is investigated. The wet-bond interface is named with respect to the dry-bond interface. The dry-bond interface is a chemical bond that is developed to adhere FRP sheets or plates to cured concrete, whereas the wet-bond interface is a chemical-bond interface that is developed to connect stay-in-place FRP formwork and cast-in-place concrete. The double-lap shear test method is adopted to evaluate the effect of the bond. The mechanical properties of the wet-bond interface are compared with that of the conventional dry-bond interface using the same epoxy adhesive, including the load-slip curves, strain distributions, load capacity, and interfacial fracture energy. The results show that the failure modes of the wet-bond and dry-bond interfaces are different. In the dry-bond specimen, debonding occurs in the thin concrete layer and is accompanied by an inclined crack near the loading end; however, in the wet-bond specimen, debonding occurs in the shallow mortar layer adjacent to the concrete-adhesive interface, and no inclined crack appears. The shear stress and slip between the FRP and concrete are obtained by differential and integration operations on the measured strain values. A bond-slip constitutive model for the wet-bond interface is proposed by a regression analysis of the test data. Numerical simulations are performed using the ANSYS finite-element software, incorporating a spring unit to simulate the overall mechanical performance of the wet-bond interface. The results show that the average wet-bond strength value is approximately 0.54–0.68 times that of the dry-bond strength value. Finally, the fracture energy and the load capacity value of the wet-bond are compared. The results show that the proposed constitutive model in this paper sufficiently simulates the overall mechanical performance of the wet-bond interface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lecturer, Southeast Univ., Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China; and School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou Univ., Zhengzhou 450002, China.

Professor, Southeast Univ., Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China (corresponding author).

Associate Professor, Southeast Univ., Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China.

Professor, Southeast Univ., Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73) ↗
2. 10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00050-110.1016/S0950-0618(99)00050-1 ↗
3. 10.1002/pse.22110.1002/pse.221 ↗
4. 10.3151/jact.4.13310.3151/jact.4.133 ↗
5. Bond of fiber-reinforced polymer laminates to concrete
6. 10.1002/pse.11310.1002/pse.113 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:2(135)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:2(135) ↗
8. 10.1002/pse.6610.1002/pse.66 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000006010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000060 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.01410.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.014 ↗
11. Maruyama K. (2001). “Recommendations for upgrading of concrete structures with use of continuous fiber sheets. Part II: Test method for continuous fiber sheets.” Research Committee on Upgrading of Concrete Structures with use of Continuous Fiber Sheets Japan Society of Civil Engineers 116–120.
12. Monti M. Renzelli M. and Luciani P. (2003). “FRP adhesion in uncracked and cracked concrete zones.” Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures World Scientific Publications 183–1192.10.1142/9789812704863_0015 ↗
13. Bond behavior between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:2(180)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:2(180) ↗
15. Shao Y. Wu Z. S. and Bian J. (2005). “Wet-bond between FRP laminates and cast-in-place concrete.” Int. Symp. on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures International Institute for FRP in Construction 91–96.
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1713)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1713) ↗
17. Tian X. Y. (2007). “Mechanical properties of HFRP and bonding between HFRP and cast-in-place concrete.” M.S. thesis Zhengzhou Univ. Henan China 53–59 (in Chinese).
18. 10.1002/pse.18710.1002/pse.187 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.019 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00100-510.1016/S0013-7944(02)00100-5 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(562)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(562) ↗
22. Experimental/analytical study on interfacial fracture energy and fracture propagation along FRP-concrete interface
23. Zhang P. (2011). “Experimental research on mechanical performance of FRP-concrete composite beam.” D.S. thesis Southeast Univ. Nanjing Jiangsu China 49–59 (in Chinese).
24. Experimental study on bonding stress distribution between HFRP and casting-in-place concrete