Fatigue Performance of Ballastless Track Slabs Reinforced with BFRP and SFCB
Source abstract
Abstract
The main objective of this research was to evaluate the behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bar-reinforced ballastless track slab subjected to a fatigue loading. Five ballastless track slabs were experimentally tested, which were reinforced with steel fiber–reinforced polymer composite bars (SFCBs), basalt fiber–reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars, and traditional steel bars, respectively. All slabs were loaded in three-point loading and designed to have the same initial stiffness of cross section. To simulate the wheel cyclic load, different maximum loads were selected, but the minimum load was the same for all slabs. At the same maximum load of 1.76 static wheel loads, the stiffness degradation and crack width in the SFCB slab were similar to those of the traditional RC slab and survived 3,000,000 fatigue cycles, showing good fatigue performance and a residual strength reduction of only approximately 3%. At the maximum load level of 60% of the ultimate load static capacity, both the SFCB slab and RC slab could satisfy the requirements of 2,000,000 fatigue cycles, whereas the stress in SFCB was only approximately 66% of the steel bar, and the crack width in the SFCB slab was 1.15 times greater than that in the RC slab. After 2,000,000 fatigue cycles, the maximum load level was increased to approximately 65% of the ultimate load static capacity. The stiffness of the RC slab decreased by 21% and was close to failure, whereas the SFCB slab only decreased by 6%. Finally, the BFRP slab had the shortest fatigue life (only 1,600,000 cycles) with a maximum load of only 52% of the ultimate load static capacity owing to the possibly reduced bond strength between concrete and BFRPs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210018, China.
Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210018, China (corresponding author).
Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210018, China.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2004). “Guide test methods for fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) for reinforcing or strengthening concrete structures.” ACI 440.3R-04 Farmington Hills MI.
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73) ↗
3. Chinese National Standard. (2010). “Code for design of concrete structures.” GB 50010-2010 China Building Industry Press Beijing (in Chinese).
4. Chinese Railway Standard. (2005). “Design code for reinforced and prestressed concrete structures of railway bridge and culvert.” TB10002.3-2005 China Railway Publishing House Beijing (in Chinese).
5. Chinese Railway Standard. (2008). “The technical specification of ZPW-2000 track circut.” TB/T3206-2008 China Railway Publishing House Beijing (in Chinese).
6. Chinese Railway Standard. (2014). “Code for design of high speed railway.” TB10621-2014 China Railway Publishing House Beijing (in Chinese).
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:3(258)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:3(258) ↗
8. Recent developments in slab track
9. Esveld C. (2010). “Recent developments in high-speed track.” 1st Int. Conf. on Road and Rail Infrastructure Univ. of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:7(1602)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:7(1602) ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000021610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000216 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(137)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(137) ↗
13. Kim M. Bae Y. Lee S. and Lee J. (2009a). “A study on electrical separation joint in the slab track.” Int. Conf. on Electrical Machines and Systems Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Piscataway NJ 1–6.10.1109/ICEMS.2009.5382647 ↗
14. A study on coupling coefficient between rail and reinforcing bars in concrete slab track
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3742)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3742) ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(273)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(273) ↗
17. Cumulative damage theory of concrete under variable-amplitude fatigue loadings
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1037)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1037) ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.03710.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.037 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(401)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(401) ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:3(524)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:3(524) ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000057710.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000577 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168441245644610.1177/0731684412456446 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.01610.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.016 ↗
25. 10.3141/1742-1110.3141/1742-11 ↗
26. Fatigue behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer tendons for prestressing applications
27. 10.1260/1369-4332.15.4.62510.1260/1369-4332.15.4.625 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000011010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000110 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.07610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.076 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.02610.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.026 ↗