journal article·2007-10

Thermal Compatibility and Bond Strength of FRP Reinforcement in Prestressed Concrete Applications

Hugues Vogel, Dagmar Svecova

Publisher page

Abstract

Due to concerns with corrosion, the use of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) as a replacement to conventional steel reinforcement has greatly increased over the last decade. However, when considering thermal gradients, many researchers have identified differential swelling between FRP reinforcement and concrete. This can lead to the development of splitting tensile stresses within the concrete cover surrounding the reinforcing bar and deterioration of the bond between the materials. A total of ten beams were therefore tested in flexure to investigate bond strength deterioration arising from thermal cycles ranging between −40 and +40°C. Beams were cast at +20°C and prestressed with either glass FRP (GFRP) or carbon FRP (CFRP) tendons. Additionally, the level of damage expected in the concrete cover of the specimens was predicted on the basis of linear elastic and nonlinear finite element analyses of thermally induced stresses. Although damage was theoretically expected, experimental results showed excellent bond performance of GFRP and CFRP tendons in concrete based on material properties and concrete cover requirements adopted for the project.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB, Canada R3T 5V6.

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB, Canada R3T 5V6.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2001). “Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI 440.1R-01 Farmington Hills Mich.
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:1(46)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:1(46) ↗
3. ASTM. (2001). “Testing bond performance of adhesive-bonded anchors.” Annual book of ASTM standards E1512-01 Vol. 04.11 Easton Md. 664–668.
4. ASTM. (2002). “Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression.” Annual book of ASTM standards C469-02 Vol. 04.02 Easton Md. 242–250.
5. ASTM. (2004a). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” Annual book of ASTM standards C39/C39M-04a Vol. 04.02 Easton Md. 18–22.
6. ASTM. (2004b). “Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” Annual book of ASTM standards C496/496M-04 Vol. 04.02 Easton Md. 268–271.
7. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2002). “Design and construction of building components with fibre-reinforced polymers.” S806-02 Toronto Ont.
8. de Schutter G. Matthys S. and Taerwe L. (1997). “Two-dimensional analysis of thermal incompatibility between FRP reinforcement and concrete.” Proc. 2nd Int. DIANA Conf. on Finite Elements in Engineering and Science Amsterdam The Netherlands 4–6.
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:2(82)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:2(82) ↗
10. Hughes Brothers Inc. (2002). “Aslan FRP fiberglass rebar.” ⟨ www.hughesbros.com ⟩ (Sept. 13 2006).
11. Rahman A. H. Kingsley C. Y. and Taylor D. A. (1995). “Thermal stress in FRP-reinforced concrete.” Proc. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Annual Conf. Montreal 605–614.
12. Timoshenko S. P. · 1970