Testing Methods to Determine Properties of Fiber Reinforced Plastic Panels Used for Reinforcing Glulams
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) panels to reinforce wood and wood composites, particularly glued laminated timber (glulam), has gained acceptance by the wood industry recently. The reinforced glulam exhibits substantial advantages in its structural and economical performance. The FRP used in the glulam reinforcement is in thin panel form with a thickness of 0.05–0.095 in. It is composed of 100% unidirectional high modulus fibers, such as aramids, carbon, or fiberglass. The fibers are embedded in a thermosetting plastic matrix in either pure or hybrid form. The fiber to resin ratio is approximately 66% by volume. Physical, mechanical, and durability properties are the most interesting properties for practice engineers and manufacturers to know. To select appropriate test methods for the evaluation of these properties is crucial for the ensuring of accurate design values. The intention of this paper is to provide a rational model for other engineers, researchers, and manufacturers to use in bringing FRP products into infrastructure and building construction places. This paper evaluated and recommended selection of existing test methods. FRP has been tested using selected test methods. Data gathered from these tests are reported in the paper.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Executive Dir., Wood Sci. and Technol. Inst., Corvallis, OR 97333.
Sen. Res. Engr., Wood Sci. and Technol. Inst., Corvalis, OR.
Former Statistician, Wood Sci. and Technol. Inst., Corvallis, OR.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pen.76026220910.1002/pen.760262209 ↗
2. Chatterjee S. N. Adams D. F. Oplinger D. W. (1993).“Test methods for composites—A status report Vol. II. Compression test methods.” Rep. DPT/FAA/CT-93/17 NJ Federal Aviation Administration Atlantic City International Airport Atlantic City N.J.
3. 10.1007/BF0036755710.1007/BF00367557 ↗
4. Daniel I. M. Hsiao H. M. Wooh S. C. Vittoser J. (1993). “Processing and compressive behavior of thick composites.” Proc. 18th Annu. Mech. of Compos. Rev.
5. “Evaluation Report 5100 Appendix E.” (1995). International Conference of Building Officials Evaluation Service Whittier Calif.
6. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90109-010.1016/0266-3538(94)90109-0 ↗
7. Häberle J. G. (1991). “Strength and failure mechanisms of unidirectional carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics under axial compression ” Doctoral thesis Aeronautics Department Imperial College University of London U.K.
8. 10.1520/JTE11845J10.1520/JTE11845J ↗
9. Shearography—a new optical method for strain measurement and non-destructive testing.
10. 10.1177/00219983950290030510.1177/002199839502900305 ↗
11. Kessler J. A. and Adams D. F. (1993). “Standardization of test methods for laminated composites—Volume II: experimental effort.” Tech. Final Rep. MSC TFR 33143/1706002 Composite Materials Research Group University of Wyoming Laramie Wyo.
12. 10.1002/pen.76035050610.1002/pen.760350506 ↗
13. Shang H. M. Toh S. L. Chau F. S. Shim V. P. W. and Tay C. J. (1991). “Locating and sizing disbonds in glassfiber-reinforced plastic plates using shearography.” J. Engrg. Mat. and Technol. January 1991 113 99–103.10.1115/1.2903388 ↗
14. 10.2514/3.5996110.2514/3.59961 ↗
15. Tingley D. A. (1994). “Aligned fiber reinforcement panel for structural wood members.” U.S. Patent Document No. 5 362 545.
16. Toh S L. Chau F. S. Chang H. M. and Tay C. J. (1987). “Flaw detection in composites using shearography.” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Compos. Mat. and the 2nd Eur. Conf. on Compos. Mat. London U.K.
17. Wardle J. G. and Steenkamer D. A. (1987). Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Compos. Mat. F. L. Matthews N. C. R. Buskell J. M. Hodglanson and J. Morton eds Elsevier Applied Science 1 New York N.Y. 199–208.
18. 10.1016/0010-4361(81)90018-510.1016/0010-4361(81)90018-5 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983950290120310.1177/002199839502901203 ↗
20. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)98914-710.1016/0010-4361(95)98914-7 ↗