Effect of Strain Rate on the Bond Performance of Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Tendons in Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the contribution of chemical adhesion and friction to the bond stress of a smooth carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendon in ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) under different strain rates by conducting static tensile and drop-weight impact tests. The influences of strain rate and embedded length on the bond performance were revealed, and the components of the bond stress for the smooth CFRP tendon in UHPC were analyzed. The results showed that an increase in the strain rate improved chemical adhesion but exhibited an adverse effect on friction. In comparison with specimens subjected to static tension, the chemical adhesion of the specimens under strain rates from 3.10 to 4.87 s−1 increased on average by 48%–78%, while the friction decreased on average by 34%–45%; however, the effect of embedment length was marginal. Based on a comparison of the bond strengths of smooth and ribbed CFRP tendons, the decrease in the interlocking interaction was considered to be responsible for the low dynamic bond strength. Finally, formulas were developed to predict the dynamic bond strength and critical anchorage length of smooth CFRP tendons in UHPC under impact events.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Associate Research Fellow, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China; Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China.
Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China (corresponding author). ORCID: .
Master’s Student, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China.
Senior Engineer, Zhongfu Carbon Fiber Core Cable Technology Co., Ltd., Lianyungang 222067, China.
Professor, Research Center for New Structural System of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.006 ↗
2. 10.1177/002199831143199410.1177/0021998311431994 ↗
3. ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D 7205. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
4. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12481210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124812 ↗
6. Eladawy, M., W. Chen, and B. Benmokrane. 2021. “Effect of bond strength of newly developed glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars on the load-slip performance.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, 18–20. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12284410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122844 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11512810.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115128 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11392710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113927 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11146410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111464 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000097010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000970 ↗
12. 10.1177/1369433222111987610.1177/13694332221119876 ↗
13. Fang, Z., T. Jiang, and D. Liang. 2007. “The anchorage behavior of CFRP tendons in RPC.” [In Chinese.] J. Hunan Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 34 (7): 1–5.
14. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.03810.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.038 ↗
15. Fu, Y., X. Yu, X. Dong, F. Zhou, and P. Li. 2019. “An experimental study of dynamic bond-slip behaviors of plain steel bars in concrete at different strain rates.” Explos. Shock Waves 39 (6): 85–93.
16. GB (Guobiao Standards). 2015. Reactive powder concrete. GB/T 31387-2015. Beijing: Standards Press of China.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.017 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10159210.1016/j.jobe.2020.101592 ↗
21. 10.1080/19648189.2021.193455410.1080/19648189.2021.1934554 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12321810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123218 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10954010.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109540 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1996)8:4(208)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1996)8:4(208) ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11983910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119839 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.013 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.13410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.134 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10740410.1016/j.jobe.2023.107404 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11712810.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117128 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11713810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117138 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12219510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122195 ↗
33. 10.1617/s11527-015-0678-310.1617/s11527-015-0678-3 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.01410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.014 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11378710.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113787 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000153510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001535 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000053710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000537 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11567610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115676 ↗