Compressive strength of honeycomb-stiffened graphite/epoxy sandwich panels with barely-visible indentation damage
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the parametric effects of core density, core thickness, face-sheet stacking sequence, and indentor diameter on the compressive strength of aluminum honeycomb-core sandwich panels stiffened with eight-ply, quasi-isotropic, graphite/epoxy face sheets. The sandwich panels contained damage at the threshold of visual detectability created through quasi-static indentation with 25.4 mm or 76.2 mm-diameter spherical indentors. During compression-after-indentation testing, failure occurred due to: dent deepening followed by localized, compressive micro-buckling of fibers in the 0° plies; localized buckling of the near-free-surface sub-laminates; or unstable dent growth in the direction lateral to the applied compressive load. Regardless of failure mode or face-sheet type, the compression-after-indentation strength increased with increasing core thickness and with decreasing core density. Additionally, panels containing face sheets with the 0° plies near the mid-plane and 45° angle change between subsequent plies exhibited greater undamaged compressive strength and higher compression-after-indentation strength relative to panels containing 90° angle changes between subsequent plies and 0° plies near the free surface. The compression-after-indentation strength was found to be relatively unaffected by the indentor diameter size and the resulting variations in the face sheet and core damage. These results imply that precise representation of the damage state in models to predict the post-indentation response of sandwich panels may not be necessary in order to make accurate average residual strength predictions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Field of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, USA
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, USA
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Bednarcyk B, Arnold S, Collier CS, et al. Preliminary structural sizing and alternative materials trade study for CEV crew module. In: 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference , Honolulu, HI, 2007.10.2514/6.2007-2175 ↗
2. Collier CS, Yarrington P, Pickenheim M, et al. Analysis methods used on the NASA composite crew module (CCM). In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference . Schaumburg, IL, 2008.10.2514/6.2008-2251 ↗
3. Avery WB and Grande DH. Influence of materials and layup parameters on impact damage mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international society for the advancement of materials and process engineering technical conference , Boston, MA, USA, 1990, pp.470–483.
4. Bull PH. Damage tolerance and residual strength of composite sandwich structures . PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00065-210.1016/S0266-3538(99)00065-2 ↗
6. Tomblin JS, Lacy TE, Smith B, et al. Review of damage tolerance for composite sandwich airframe structures . Final Report, Federal Aviation Administration Report, DOT/FAA/AR-99/49, 1999.
7. Shyprykevich P, Tomblin JS, Ilcewicz L, et al. Guidelines for analysis, testing, and nondestructive inspection of impact-damaged composite sandwich structures . Final Report, Federal Aviation Administration Report, DOT/FAA/AR-02/121, 2003.
8. 10.1115/1.310168910.1115/1.3101689 ↗
9. 10.1017/S000192400000038510.1017/S0001924000000385 ↗
10. Lacy TE, Samarah IK and Tomblin JS. Damage tolerance characterization of sandwich composites using response surfaces . Final Report, Federal Aviation Administration Report, DOT/FAA/AR-02/101, 2002.10.4271/2002-01-1538 ↗
11. Tomblin JS, Raju KS, Walker T, et al. Damage tolerance of composite sandwich airframe structures – additional results . Final Report, Federal Aviation Administration Report, DOT/FAA/AR-05/33, 2005.
12. Tshang PH and Lagace PA. Failure mechanisms of impact damaged sandwich panels under uniaxial compression. In: 35th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference , Hilton Head, SC, 1994, pp.745–754.10.2514/6.1994-1396 ↗
13. Moody C · 2000
14. 10.1007/1-4020-3848-8_3610.1007/1-4020-3848-8_36 ↗
15. Minguet PJ. A model for predicting the behavior of impact damaged minimum gage sandwich panels under compression. In: 32st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference , Baltimore, MD, 1991, pp.1112–1122.10.2514/6.1991-1075 ↗
16. Ratcliffe JG, Jackson WC and Schaff J. Predicting the compression strength of impact-damaged sandwich panels. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 60th annual forum , Baltimore, MD, 2004.
17. Ratcliffe JG and Jackson WC. A finite element analysis for predicting the residual compressive strength of impact-damaged sandwich panels. NASA Technical Memorandum, NASA/TM-2008-215341, 2008.
18. MIL-HDBK-17-3F. Composite materials handbook: Polymer matrix composites materials usage, design, and analysis . Vol. 3. USA: Department of Defense.
19. 10.1177/002199830934955010.1177/0021998309349550 ↗
20. 10.1177/109963620605688810.1177/1099636206056888 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.013 ↗
22. 10.1177/109963620706713410.1177/1099636207067134 ↗
23. Singh AK · J Compos Mater · 2012 · 46 · 1
24. Williamson JE and Lagace PA. Response mechanisms in the impact of graphite/epoxy honeycomb sandwich panels. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Composites eighth technical conference on composite materials , Cleveland, OH, 1993.
25. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00089-410.1016/S0266-3538(97)00089-4 ↗
26. 10.1520/STP33149S10.1520/STP33149S ↗
27. Hexcel Corporation. HexPly® 8552 Product Data Sheet, 2007. http://www.hexcel.com.
28. ASTM C354. Test method for edgewise compressive strength of sandwich constructions. Annual book of ASTM standards . West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
29. 10.4050/JAHS.44.26010.4050/JAHS.44.260 ↗
30. Czabaj MW. Damage and damage tolerance of high temperature composites and composite sandwich structures . PhD Thesis, Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, 2011.
31. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4334-210.1007/978-1-4612-4334-2 ↗
32. 10.1007/3-540-48800-6_510.1007/3-540-48800-6_5 ↗
33. Greenhalgh ES · 2009
34. 10.1177/00219983000340140210.1177/002199830003401402 ↗