Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G8,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G8
Resin Systems Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5M 3C5
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G7
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Smith, T.R. · Modern Plastics · 1969 · 46 · 124
2. 10.1088/0022-3727/5/9/31910.1088/0022-3727/5/9/319 ↗
3. Talreja, R. · 1987
4. 10.1177/00219983830170020310.1177/002199838301700203 ↗
5. Smith, T.R. · Modern Plastics · 1969 · 46 · 128
6. Owen, M.J. · Plastics and Polymers · 1969 · 37 · 227
7. Owen, M.J. · Modern Plastics · 1970 · 47 · 130
8. 10.1520/JTE10547J10.1520/JTE10547J ↗
9. 10.1177/00219983780120020310.1177/002199837801200203 ↗
10. Hellan, K. (1984). Introduction to Fracture Mechanics, pp. 49-69, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
11. Curtis, P.T. · Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures · 1986 · 2 · 297
12. Talreja, R. · 461
13. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00089-410.1016/S1359-835X(97)00089-4 ↗
14. 10.1023/A:100468422876510.1023/A:1004684228765 ↗
15. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D 638-01 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (2002), 08.01.
16. Hertzberg, R.W. and Manson, J.A. (1980). Fatigue of Engineering Plastics, pp. 185-271, Academic Press, New York .