Investigation of vibration characteristics of cracked aluminum plates repaired with carbon fiber composite patches
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the alterations in the dynamic properties of damaged aluminum plates following repair with carbon fiber composite patches. Initially, cracks of varying lengths (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm) were introduced at different locations (mid-straight, mid-diagonal, corner-straight, and corner-diagonal) on 1.8 × 200 × 200 mm aluminum plates. Subsequently, these induced defects were repaired using single-sided and double-sided patches produced via the vacuum infusion method. The research then focused on analyzing how the resonance frequencies, vibration mode shapes, and damping ratios of the plates changed after these repairs. The dynamic properties of the plates were determined using the Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) method. The results indicate significant changes in the dynamic properties of the plates due to crack formation and patch repairs. The first five modes of the plates were analyzed, and variations in resonance frequencies, influenced by crack length, location (middle or corner regions), and application type (single-sided or double-sided), reached up to 6.07%. While no substantial change was observed in the vibration mode shapes, particularly at lower frequencies, the fifth vibration mode showed the highest variation at 8.8%. Additionally, remarkably high changes in vibration damping ratios, up to 37.39%, were observed. The findings were presented in a comparative and elucidative manner, aiming to contribute to the literature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Applications · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkiye
Funding
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.071 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00129-710.1016/S0020-7683(97)00129-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.014 ↗
4. Albedah A Bouiadjra BB Ouddad W et al. Elastic plastic analysis of bonded composite repair in cracked aircraft structures. J Reinforc Plast Compos; 30(1): 66–72.10.1177/0731684410383066 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.051 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.10182110.1016/j.apmt.2023.101821 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.029 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11152910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111529 ↗
10. Baker AA. Development of a hard-patch approach for scarf repair of composite structure. Defence Science and Technology Organisation Report TR-1892 2006: 19.
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11292810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112928 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11793410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117934 ↗
14. Hilton S Walker J De Backer W Automated repair of carbon fiber composites on AAM vehicles VFS 6th Decennial Aeromechanics Specialists’ Conference Santa Clara CA USA 2024.
15. 10.1007/s00170-024-13592-x10.1007/s00170-024-13592-x ↗
16. Rashvand K, Eder MA, Sarhadi A. In-situ and adhesive repair of continuous fiber composites using 3D printing. Addit Manuf 2024; 80: 103975.
17. 10.1177/002199831877785110.1177/0021998318777851 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.07210.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.072 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.020 ↗
20. Benziane MM, Wahab SAA, Zahloul H, et al. Finite element analysis of the integrity of an API X65 pipeline with a longitudinal crack repaired with single- and double-bonded composites. Composites Part B 2015; 77: 431e439.
21. 10.1177/002199831772204410.1177/0021998317722044 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.06910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.069 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10278110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102781 ↗
24. 10.1177/002199832093117710.1177/0021998320931177 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199831985303310.1177/0021998319853033 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.06.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2009.06.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.047 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.04810.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.048 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.016 ↗
30. 10.1007/s42401-024-00289-y10.1007/s42401-024-00289-y ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.04910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.049 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00005-210.1016/S0263-8223(00)00005-2 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.07910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.079 ↗
34. 10.21205/deufmd.202325730910.21205/deufmd.2023257309 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.dt.2023.06.01710.1016/j.dt.2023.06.017 ↗
36. Gangadharan S Baliga SV Sonawane NH et al. Impact analysis of composite repair patches of different shapes at low velocities for aircraft composite structures. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering J Aeronaut Aerospace Eng; 5(4): 1000173.
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11316810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113168 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.024 ↗
39. 10.1108/IJSI-11-2023-011310.1108/IJSI-11-2023-0113 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11380510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113805 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10355910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103559 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00197-610.1016/S0263-8223(02)00197-6 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.08.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.08.022 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11189610.1016/j.tws.2024.111896 ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.2800410.1002/pc.28004 ↗
46. 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00024-410.1016/S1359-8368(99)00024-4 ↗
47. 10.1177/002199831769203310.1177/0021998317692033 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.03810.1016/j.cja.2020.09.038 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00076-310.1016/S0263-8223(00)00076-3 ↗
50. 10.1177/073168440202100683210.1177/0731684402021006832 ↗
51. 10.3390/ma1406142110.3390/ma14061421 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.28210.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.282 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.12.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.12.012 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.008 ↗
55. 10.1186/s40563-014-0027-810.1186/s40563-014-0027-8 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.017 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11587510.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115875 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.018 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10717610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107176 ↗
60. Şen M. A comprehensive review study on composite patch applications, J Reinforc Plast Compos, 2025.