journal article·2017-05

Thermal optimization of composite autoclave molds using the shift factor approach for boundary condition estimation

Tobias A Weber, Jan-Christoph Arent, Lucas Steffens, Johannes M Balvers, Miro Duhovic

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 51· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Thermal optimization of autoclave molds is essential to increase part quality, reduce manufacturing costs and increase autoclave capacity. Previous experience-based tooling designs allowed an optimization only after the mold was manufactured and tested. Manufacturing process simulation provides the capability for virtual tooling optimization within the design phase. Thereby, the range of possible optimizations increases and the tooling cost decreases. In order to use manufacturing process simulation efficiently, fast but accurate simulation methods must be available. The so-called shift factor approach was previously presented by the authors. This paper takes up the given approach and explains different influences on mold heat-up and how they can be covered in a thermal tooling simulation on an industrial scale. Proof of the simulation accuracy under realistic manufacturing conditions is provided together with an example of its application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH, Germany

Institut für Verbundwerkstoffe GmbH, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Johnston AA. An integrated model of the development of process-induced deformations in autoclave processing of composite structures . PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1997.
2. Svanberg JM · 2002
3. Slesinger N, Shimizu T, Arafath ARA, et al. Heat transfer coefficient distribution inside an autoclave. In: 17th International conference on composite material ICCM , 27–31 July 2009, Edinburgh, UK.
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03610.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.036 ↗
5. 10.1515/SECM.1996.5.3-4.23510.1515/SECM.1996.5.3-4.235 ↗
6. 10.1016/0735-1933(94)90032-910.1016/0735-1933(94)90032-9 ↗
7. Xie G, Lui J, Zhang W, et al. Simulation and thermal analysis on temperature fields during composite curing process in autoclave technology. In: ASME 2012 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition , Houston, TX, 9–15 November 2012, pp.1–9.10.1115/IMECE2012-85918 ↗
8. 10.1177/00219983830170020410.1177/002199838301700204 ↗
9. Twarowski TE · J Compos Mater · 1993 · 27 · 215
10. 10.1177/00219983910250030210.1177/002199839102500302 ↗
11. 10.1016/0956-7143(94)90025-610.1016/0956-7143(94)90025-6 ↗
12. 10.1134/S181023281301006210.1134/S1810232813010062 ↗
13. Hudek M. Examination of heat transfer during autoclave processing of polymer composites . Master’s Thesis, University of Manitoba, Canada, 2001.
14. Weber TA · Int J Aviation Aeronaut Aerosp · 2017 · 4
15. Holman JP · 1990
16. 10.1007/s10999-012-9205-710.1007/s10999-012-9205-7 ↗
17. Brauner C · 2013
18. Balvers JM, Bersee HEN and Beukers A. Determination of cure dependent properties for curing simulation of thick-walled composites. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference , Schaumburg, IL, 7–10 April 2008.10.2514/6.2008-2035 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00116-910.1016/S0266-3538(96)00116-9 ↗
20. 10.1002/pen.76013011010.1002/pen.760130110 ↗
21. Weber TA and Balvers JM. Manufacturing process simulation for tooling optimization: reduction of quality issues during autoclave manufacturing of composite parts. In: SAMPE Europe 2015 conference proceedings , Amiens, France, 15–17 September 2015.
22. Lienhard VJH · 2011
23. Kaye GWC · 2008