journal article·2022-07

Modeling of the creep behavior of epoxy/yerba-mate residue composites

Roberta Motta Neves, Eduardo Fischer Kerche, Francisco Maciel Monticeli, Heitor Luiz

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 56· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

This work presents the short-term creep behavior of novel epoxy composites reinforced by post-consumed yerba-mate (YM). Particulate composites were manufactured using 5, 10, and 20 wt.% of YM. The composite morphologies were related to the dynamic mechanical and creep behavior at the glassy state (∼30°C). Creep tests were performed using three different stress loads (1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 MPa). Weibull model, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) were used to fit the experimental curves and to predict results. A better fit was obtained using the ANN approach than the Weibull model due to the capability of ANN to learn from own data and in fitting complex nonlinear data. The RSM approach proved to be an intelligent and reliable technique to access a higher range of results, reducing experimental time and cost and keeping statistical significance. Also, the present methodology can be extended to model and predict other properties and/or optimize parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Wood Treatment and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Postgraduate Program in Mining, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (PPGE3M), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil

Mantoflex Indústria de Plásticos Ltda, Caxias do Sul, Brazil

Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Technological Institute of Aeronautics (ITA), São José dos Campos, Brazil

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/app.5043810.1002/app.50438 ↗
2. IBGE. Estatísticas relacionadas a produção da erva-mate: Extração e Cultivo. 2021, pp. 1–23.
3. Croge CP · Scientia Agricola · 2020 · 78 · 1
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10871710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108717 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-005-2020-x10.1007/s10853-005-2020-x ↗
6. 10.1177/030932472097663710.1177/0309324720976637 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10071210.1016/j.coco.2021.100712 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.02.01510.1016/j.polymer.2004.02.015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10005110.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100051 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.02.01510.1016/j.polymer.2004.02.015 ↗
11. Eggers F · Polymers (Basel) · 2021 · 23 · 1
12. 10.1515/POLYENG.2001.21.6.48910.1515/POLYENG.2001.21.6.489 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.07210.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.072 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.04.00610.1016/j.coco.2020.04.006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.023 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.014 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11043-020-09463-z10.1007/s11043-020-09463-z ↗
18. 10.1177/002199832092777410.1177/0021998320927774 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10071210.1016/j.coco.2021.100712 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.023 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11043-020-09463-z10.1007/s11043-020-09463-z ↗
22. 10.3390/textiles102001310.3390/textiles1020013 ↗
23. 10.1038/nbt138610.1038/nbt1386 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10570-021-03684-210.1007/s10570-021-03684-2 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.01110.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.clet.2021.10030310.1016/j.clet.2021.100303 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.35610.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.356 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00179-310.1016/S0263-8223(00)00179-3 ↗
29. 10.5772/intechopen.7369010.5772/intechopen.73690 ↗
30. 10.30880/ijie.2018.10.01.00710.30880/ijie.2018.10.01.007 ↗
31. 10.1177/1558925021104018410.1177/15589250211040184 ↗
32. 10.1080/00405000.2017.136558010.1080/00405000.2017.1365580 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.04210.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.042 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.10510.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.105 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10693510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106935 ↗
36. 10.1002/app.5135010.1002/app.51350 ↗
37. 10.1177/073168441561845910.1177/0731684415618459 ↗
38. 10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.3410.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.34 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.5043810.1002/app.50438 ↗
40. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-076810.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0768 ↗
41. 10.1002/pc.2535510.1002/pc.25355 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10693510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106935 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10707410.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107074 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.08510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.085 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.021 ↗
46. 10.1590/S1517-7076201200030000710.1590/S1517-70762012000300007 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.05.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.05.003 ↗