journal article·2026-03-30Open access

Mechanical properties of recycled plastic composites reinforced with construction and demolition waste using various particle sizes

Ida Rasilainen, Ville Lahtela, Timo Kärki

Abstract

Large volumes of plastic waste and construction and demolition waste (CDW) are generated globally. While the mechanical recycling of plastics often results in deteriorated material properties and the formation of polymer blends, the fine fraction of CDW lacks viable applications. This study addresses both challenges by converting these waste streams into valuable composite materials. Two CDW-derived fine fractions were examined: a mineral fraction composed of concrete and brick materials sourced from a demolition site, and a mixed CDW side-stream from a waste treatment plant containing concrete, ceramics, bricks, asphalt, gypsum, glass, plastics, and wood, with organics removed before filler processing. Both materials were subsequently ground into three particle sizes (∼74–85 μm, 18–19 μm, and 9–13 μm), yielding six distinct filler materials. These fillers were then incorporated into a heterogeneous plastic waste matrix (LDPE/HDPE/PP/PET; 35/35/20/20 wt%) at various loadings (1, 2.5, and 5 wt%), to assess the influence of particle size, filler content, and material characteristics on the overall reinforcing performance. The resulting composites, regardless of filler type and loading, exhibited an approximately 50% reduction in the standard deviation of tensile properties. Mechanical testing further revealed that reducing the particle size enhanced the mechanical performance of the composites, yielding up to an 11% increase in tensile strength and a 7% increase in elastic modulus. CDW-based composites also outperformed commercial nanoclay, which suffered from severe agglomeration and weak interfacial bonding with the recycled matrix. These outcomes demonstrate that CDW-origin fillers hold potential as reinforcing fillers for various polymeric applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT

Funding

European Union

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.clema.2024.10022010.1016/j.clema.2024.100220 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym1424539010.3390/polym14245390 ↗
3. Statista. Plastic waste worldwide - statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/5401/global-plastic-waste/ (accessed 7 August 2025).
4. 10.30564/jbms.v7i2.978610.30564/jbms.v7i2.9786 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.02810.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.028 ↗
6. 10.30880/ijie.2022.14.08.00210.30880/ijie.2022.14.08.002 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.4228710.1002/app.42287 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.05.05410.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.05.054 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11132010.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111320 ↗
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.821.6710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.821.67 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.03.01910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.03.019 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.514298810.1063/1.5142988 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.5276810.1002/app.52768 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.10112110.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101121 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.clay.2019.10518510.1016/j.clay.2019.105185 ↗
16. 10.1177/0021998323116894610.1177/00219983231168946 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.3973310.1002/app.39733 ↗
18. Raja RS, Manisekar K, Manikandan V. Effect of fly ash filler size on mechanical properties of polymer matrix composites. Int J Min Metall Mech Eng 2013; 1: 34–37.
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.06.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.06.021 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2352410.1002/pc.23524 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10163-024-01911-z10.1007/s10163-024-01911-z ↗
22. 10.1007/s41204-024-00396-310.1007/s41204-024-00396-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.05710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.057 ↗
24. Kanda Y, Abass M. Effective utilization of recycled fine aggregate powder as reinforcement particles in polyethylene composite. Polym Polym Compos 2020; 29: 939–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967391120951381
25. 10.1007/s10924-019-01569-x10.1007/s10924-019-01569-x ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2930410.1002/pc.29304 ↗
27. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-073410.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0734 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.05410.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.054 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2814110.1002/pc.28141 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.04710.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.047 ↗
31. López-Ramirez R, Flores-Vazquez AL, Castrejon-Sanchez V, et al. Study of mechanical, thermal, and microstructural properties of polypropylene/ceramic waste composites. Mater Sci-Medzg 2023; 29: 224–233. https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.ms.30947
32. Yaduwanshi DK, Gudadhe N, Tiwari P, et al. Experimental study on recycled HDPE and waste glass powder composite material for pipe production. Int J Veh Struct Syst 2024; 16: 186–192. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.16.2.09
33. 10.1002/pen.2434210.1002/pen.24342 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10924-020-01961-y10.1007/s10924-020-01961-y ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2214010.1002/pc.22140 ↗
36. 10.3390/en1421730610.3390/en14217306 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.02.02310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.02.023 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.11.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.11.001 ↗
39. Plastics Europe. Plastics - the facts 2022. https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/ accessed 11 February 2025.
40. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0064810.1021/acsapm.1c00648 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.02.00510.1016/j.aiepr.2021.02.005 ↗
42. SFS-EN ISO 527-2:2025. Plastics. Determination of tensile properties. Part 2: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. 2nd ed.
43. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11986510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119865 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10731910.1016/j.jobe.2023.107319 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.rinma.2021.10025010.1016/j.rinma.2021.100250 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
47. 10.1002/mame.20130044210.1002/mame.201300442 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10338-024-00498-010.1007/s10338-024-00498-0 ↗
49. 10.1155/tswj/551940910.1155/tswj/5519409 ↗
50. 10.1002/pls2.7002910.1002/pls2.70029 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.clay.2018.01.03910.1016/j.clay.2018.01.039 ↗