Compressive behavior of triaxially braided metal-CFRP hybrid lattice structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Cellular approaches facilitate the flexible design of materials with desirable properties that may be manufactured from single polymers, metals, and, recently, fiber-reinforced composites. This paper describes cellular materials with metal and carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) struts. Composite lattice tubular structures were automatically braided, and the effects of axial CFRP yarns on the compressive behaviors of braided lattices were studied. Metal wire-reinforced plastic and metal rods served as axial yarns when preparing hybrid triaxially braided metal-CFRP lattices. The effects of the axial yarns in polyurethane (PU) foam-filled samples were also assessed. Ten braided structures were manufactured, and their compressive behavior and energy absorption were evaluated by axial compression tests. Finite element (FE) simulations were used to investigate deformation, buckling, and damage. Addition of axial CFRP yarns improved the compressive properties; the specific absorbed energy (SAE) increased by 16%. Hybridization further enhanced the SAE by 62%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Analysis and Optimization · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Research Institute of Advanced Materials, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Jafari Nedoushan R · Mech Adv Mater Struct · 2021 · 30 · 1
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11460510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114605 ↗
3. 10.1088/2631-6331/abd37310.1088/2631-6331/abd373 ↗
4. 10.1002/zamm.20200027710.1002/zamm.202000277 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10841310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108413 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10662710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106627 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tws.2009.02.00210.1016/j.tws.2009.02.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.05.00310.1016/j.tws.2013.05.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tws.2014.06.01210.1016/j.tws.2014.06.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10737110.1016/j.tws.2020.107371 ↗
11. 10.1590/1679-7825324210.1590/1679-78253242 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10705810.1016/j.tws.2020.107058 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.01.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.01.006 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.12.01710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.12.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.028 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.021 ↗
20. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-032610.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0326 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.067 ↗
22. 10.1115/1.403112210.1115/1.4031122 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.09.01110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.09.011 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.00510.1016/j.acme.2014.09.005 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.03210.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.032 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10684910.1016/j.tws.2020.106849 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.04.04910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.04.049 ↗
28. 10.1177/109963621560303510.1177/1099636215603035 ↗
29. 10.1177/109963621455459710.1177/1099636214554597 ↗
30. 10.1177/109963621350964410.1177/1099636213509644 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.11010.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.110 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.06610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.066 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.018 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.025 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.00510.1016/j.tws.2017.03.005 ↗
36. 10.1088/2631-6331/abb44810.1088/2631-6331/abb448 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11176810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111768 ↗
38. 10.1177/0731684423122534310.1177/07316844231225343 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12834610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128346 ↗
40. 10.1177/002199831877346010.1177/0021998318773460 ↗
41. 10.1177/002199831771081210.1177/0021998317710812 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10443-018-9706-010.1007/s10443-018-9706-0 ↗
43. 2019
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11106510.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111065 ↗
45. Chamis CC. Mechanics of composite materials: past, present and future. In: 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Engineering Science, Blacksburg, VA, October 15, 1984.
46. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
47. Chamis C · 1984
48. Tabatabaei S, Bedogni E, Melro A, et al. Meso-FE simulation of progressive damage in textile composites using mesh superposition method. In: ECCM 2016-Proceeding of the 17th European Conference on Composite Materials, Munich, Germany, 26-30th June 2016.
49. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.01410.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.014 ↗
50. Tabatabaei SA, Bedogni E, Ivanov D, et al. Meso-scale damage modelling of textile composite using the embeddec element technique and contact algorithm. In: 16th European Conference on Composite Materials, Seville, Spain, 22–26 June 2014.
51. Tabatabaei SA, Lomov SV, Verpoest I. Embedded element method in meso finite elementmodelling of textile composites: A gallery. 20th International conference on composite materials Copenhagen, 19–24th July 2015.