journal article·2019-10

Properties and fungal biodegradation of the different cellulose derivatives structure included into castor oil-based polyurethane composites

Stefan Oprea, Petronela Gradinariu, Veronica Oprea

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 53· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

The requirement to protect the environment involves the synthesis of new polymers, blends, and composites with a high content of biodegradable components. This work studies the synthesis and biodegradation of castor oil-based polyurethanes filled with different cellulose derivatives (hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose). The polyurethane composites present a slight decrease in tensile strength and thermal stability with the increase in cellulose derivatives content. Scanning electron microscopy results showed a good dispersion of the cellulose derivatives within the polyurethane matrix. The degradation of polyurethane–cellulose derivatives by the soft rot fungus Chaetomium globosum was investigated by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and behavior of mechanical properties. The results showed that the inclusion of cellulose derivatives results in an increase in the rate of degradation. The obtained polyurethane–cellulose derivative composites have preserved their processability and mechanical resistance and exhibited enhanced biodegradability becoming useful eco-friendly polymeric materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polyaddition Department, “P Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Romania

Faculty of Medicine, Biological Research Institute, Romania

Microbiology Department, “Gr. T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002199831771070710.1177/0021998317710707 ↗
2. 10.1177/002199830934534210.1177/0021998309345342 ↗
3. 10.1177/002199831039241510.1177/0021998310392415 ↗
4. 10.1080/09205063.2016.123994810.1080/09205063.2016.1239948 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.08.01610.1016/j.mattod.2013.08.016 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.02.03410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.02.034 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.04010.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.040 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5TC02359A10.1039/C5TC02359A ↗
9. Zhang C · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2015 · 7
10. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.02.01410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.02.014 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.02110.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.021 ↗
12. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.8610.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.86 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.02310.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.023 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.027 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.023 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-010-9423-910.1007/s10570-010-9423-9 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma603073810.3390/ma6030738 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10570-013-0099-910.1007/s10570-013-0099-9 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00107005031110.1007/s001070050311 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:102535670266010.1023/A:1025356702660 ↗
22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960613)60:11<1939::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960613)60:11<1939::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.02.01210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.02.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.018 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10570-016-0861-x10.1007/s10570-016-0861-x ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.08910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.089 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10570-014-0405-110.1007/s10570-014-0405-1 ↗
28. Gencturk A · Int J Electrochem Sci · 2016 · 11 · 11110.1016/S1452-3981(23)15830-5 ↗
29. 10.9734/BJAST/2017/3411410.9734/BJAST/2017/34114 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.01510.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.015 ↗
31. 10.1039/C5RA04589D10.1039/C5RA04589D ↗
32. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.08.01310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.08.013 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.09.01110.1016/j.ibiod.2010.09.011 ↗
34. 10.1080/03602559.2014.93541110.1080/03602559.2014.935411 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.05.01910.1016/j.ibiod.2013.05.019 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.11.00910.1016/j.ibiod.2012.11.009 ↗
37. 10.1098/rsta.2010.000910.1098/rsta.2010.0009 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00177-410.1016/S0964-8305(02)00177-4 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10570-016-0972-410.1007/s10570-016-0972-4 ↗
40. ASTM G 21. Standard practice for determining resistance of synthetic polymeric materials to fungi , 2002. ASTM International, Washington, DC, USA.
41. Thom C and Church MB. The Aspergilli . Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1926.
42. 10.1201/978142003972610.1201/9781420039726 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11046-007-9023-x10.1007/s11046-007-9023-x ↗
44. 10.1039/C6GC00365F10.1039/C6GC00365F ↗
45. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2009.09.00210.1016/j.vibspec.2009.09.002 ↗
46. 10.1166/mex.2015.125410.1166/mex.2015.1254 ↗