journal article·2019-01Open access

Image processing and data evaluation algorithms for reproducible optical in-plane permeability characterization by radial flow experiments

Ewald Fauster, David C Berg, Dilmurat Abliz, Harald Grössing, Dieter Meiners, Gerhard Ziegmann, Ralf Schledjewski

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 53· Issue 1

Abstract

Textile permeability is one of the dictating factors in the fabrication of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. However, reproducibility of experimental in-plane permeability characterization is still a challenging task due to the lack of standardized test and evaluation procedures. The paper at hand addresses two major sources for discrepancies when characterizing in-plane permeability through optical observation of radial flow experiments: digital image processing and data evaluation algorithms. A digital image processing strategy is presented, which robustly handles varying lightning conditions, optical properties of the materials under test and image occlusions caused by mechanical elements of the test setup. The strategy is of universal validity and independent of the choice of reinforcing material and impregnating fluid. An experimental analysis compares two approaches for fitting elliptic geometry models to data points detected along the fluid flow front. The study reveals the impact of the fitting strategy on the resulting permeability data and the benefit of forcing the ellipse centre to that of the injection opening. The computation algorithm of Chan and Hwang, widely used for calculating in-plane permeability values from experimental data, is critically discussed. A correction of the algorithm is proposed which avoids a violation of isotropic data characteristics while adding robustness to the data reduction. An experimental analysis compares anisotropic in-plane permeability values obtained with different evaluation algorithms. The study highlights the impact of the computational algorithm on the permeability data and reveals discrepancies of up to 6%, which is considerable compared to the scatter typically reported for in-plane permeability data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Processing of Composites Group, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria

Department of Polymer Materials and Plastics Engineering, Clausthal University of Technology, Germany

Christian Doppler Laboratory for High Efficient Composite Processing, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. Bear J · 1988
2. Rouhi MS · Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci · 2016 · 2 · 14
3. 10.1007/s11242-016-0629-710.1007/s11242-016-0629-7 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199830404558510.1177/0021998304045585 ↗
5. 10.5772/6116710.5772/61167 ↗
6. Henry Darcy · 1856
7. 10.1007/BF0137698910.1007/BF01376989 ↗
8. Neitzel M · 2004
9. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00318-310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00318-3 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0014126110.1007/BF00141261 ↗
11. 10.1080/0262666650949340510.1080/02626666509493405 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199830809650210.1177/0021998308096502 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.07110.1016/j.msea.2008.01.071 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00049-310.1016/S1359-835X(97)00049-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00183-310.1016/S1359-835X(98)00183-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00184-510.1016/S1359-835X(98)00184-5 ↗
17. 10.1177/07316844970160010510.1177/073168449701600105 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.024 ↗
19. Francucci G · Spec Issue Flow Processes Compos Mater · 2010 · 41 · 16
20. Luthy T. Three-dimensional permeability measurements based on direct current and ultrasound monitoring techniques . Dissertation, ETH Zürich, Zürich, 2003.
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.021 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00077-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00077-9 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00087-110.1016/S1359-835X(99)00087-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00088-310.1016/S1359-835X(99)00088-3 ↗
25. Di Fratta C · Polym Compos · 2015
26. 10.1002/pc.1058910.1002/pc.10589 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00058-510.1016/S1359-835X(99)00058-5 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.1034210.1002/pc.10342 ↗
29. Meier R · J Plast Technol · 2014 · 27
30. 10.1002/pen.76026201310.1002/pen.760262013 ↗
31. 10.1177/00405175870570110410.1177/004051758705701104 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.019 ↗
33. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00035-010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00035-0 ↗
34. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.1410.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.14 ↗
35. Kissinger C, Mitschang P, Neitzel M, et al. Continuous on-line permeability measurement of textile structures. In: Proceedings of 45th international SAMPE symposium , Long Beach, California, 21–25 May 2000.
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.021 ↗
38. Becker D · Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci · 2016 · 2 · 34
39. 10.1002/pen.76031161310.1002/pen.760311613 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.75016060210.1002/pc.750160602 ↗
41. 10.1002/pc.1065810.1002/pc.10658 ↗
42. Shafi V · 1996
43. 10.1023/A:101551131259510.1023/A:1015511312595 ↗
44. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00049-510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00049-5 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.11.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2003.11.002 ↗
46. Stadtfeld H. Entwicklung einer Messzelle zur Bestimmung von Kompaktierungs- und Permeabilitätskennwerten bei flächigen Faserhalbzeugen . Dissertation, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, 2006.
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.005 ↗
48. Gonzalez RC · 2008
49. Sonka M · 1999
50. 10.1364/AO.25.00043110.1364/AO.25.000431 ↗
51. 10.1016/0146-664X(79)90082-010.1016/0146-664X(79)90082-0 ↗
52. 10.1016/0146-664X(82)90101-010.1016/0146-664X(82)90101-0 ↗
53. Harker M and O’Leary P. First order geometric distance (the myth of Sampsonus). In: British machine vision conference , Edinburgh, UK, 4-7 September 2006, pp.87–96.
54. 10.1007/BF0193426810.1007/BF01934268 ↗
55. 10.1109/ICIP.1996.56056610.1109/ICIP.1996.560566 ↗
56. Fitzgibbon AW, Pilu M and Fisher RB. Direct least squares fitting of ellipses 1996; no. 794.10.1109/ICPR.1996.546029 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.laa.2003.08.02210.1016/j.laa.2003.08.022 ↗
58. 10.1117/1.175895110.1117/1.1758951 ↗
59. Harker M, O’Leary P and Zsombor-Murray P. Direct and specific fitting of conics to scattered data. In: British machine vision conference (eds Hoppe A, Barman S and Ellis T), Kingston, UK, 7-9 September 2004, pp.9.1–9.10.10.5244/C.18.9 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.imavis.2006.12.00610.1016/j.imavis.2006.12.006 ↗
61. O'Leary P, Harker M and Zsombor-Murray P. Fitting coupled geometric objects for metric vision. In: Fourth Indian conference on computer vision graphics & image processing , Kolkata, India, 16-18 December 2004.
62. 10.1016/j.patrec.2007.05.01210.1016/j.patrec.2007.05.012 ↗
63. 10.1016/0301-9322(88)90006-710.1016/0301-9322(88)90006-7 ↗
64. 10.1002/pc.75012030710.1002/pc.750120307 ↗
65. 10.1002/pc.75012030810.1002/pc.750120308 ↗
66. 10.1016/0022-1694(65)90002-810.1016/0022-1694(65)90002-8 ↗
67. Berg DC, Fauster E, Abliz D, et al. Influence of test rig configuration and evaluation algorithms on optical radial-flow permeability measurement: a benchmark exercise. In: Proceedings of 20th international conference on composite materials , Copenhagen, Denmark, 19-24 July 2015.
68. Berg DC. Implementation of MATLAB code along with comments used for evaluation of 2D permeability measurements at TU Clausthal, PuK, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany , 2011.
69. Carter EJ · Compos Manuf · 1995 · 6 · 228
70. Felix Klein · 1967
71. Golub GH · 1964