Material and structural response of polymer-matrix fibre-reinforced composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a pressure-dependent three-dimensional constitutive law to predict failure for laminated composites. The nonlinear constitutive response in shear and in the transverse and through-the-thickness directions, which is measured experimentally, is incorporated directly into the model. In addition, secant stiffnesses are dependent on the state of hydrostatic pressure and on the general state of strain. The failure criteria distinguish between matrix failure, fibre kinking and fibre tensile failure. In-situ strengths are used for matrix failure. Propagation of failure takes into consideration the fracture energy associated with each failure mode and, for matrix failure, the accumulation of cracks in the plies. A detailed discussion is undertaken of the mismatch between the available experimental data and the physical properties required to characterise the constitutive response up to final failure. The model is employed to make blind predictions of the triaxial failure envelopes and stress–strain curves of all 12 test cases provided by the organisers of the second World-Wide Failure Exercise.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aeronautics, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK
Luxner Engineering ZT, Christian-Plattner-Str. 4, Imst, Austria
DEMEGI, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto, Portugal
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.023 ↗
2. Pinho ST, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, et al. Failure models and criteria for frp under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linearity. NASA/TM-2005-213530. NASA Langley Research Center. Hampton, VA 2368, 2005.
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.016 ↗
5. Dávila CG
6. 10.1177/002199830504645210.1177/0021998305046452 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0054955010.1007/BF00549550 ↗
8. 10.1016/0167-6636(88)90003-810.1016/0167-6636(88)90003-8 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0116307810.1007/BF01163078 ↗
10. 10.1023/A:101853361329610.1023/A:1018533613296 ↗
11. 10.1177/00219983920260040110.1177/002199839202600401 ↗
12. 10.1177/00219983920260060410.1177/002199839202600604 ↗
13. 10.1007/PL0002025310.1007/PL00020253 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8584-0_510.1007/978-1-4020-8584-0_5 ↗
15. 10.1177/08927057950080040310.1177/089270579500800403 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.76017030410.1002/pen.760170304 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00152-610.1016/S1359-835X(04)00152-6 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.171041710.1063/1.1710417 ↗
19. 10.1016/0266-3538(90)90019-210.1016/0266-3538(90)90019-2 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0075221110.1007/BF00752211 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00079-110.1016/S0266-3538(97)00079-1 ↗
22. 10.1080/0022234760820866310.1080/00222347608208663 ↗
23. 10.1080/0091403740808192210.1080/00914037408081922 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0242685910.1007/BF02426859 ↗
25. D3518/D3518M-94 A. Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ±45° laminate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007.
26. D7078/D7078M-05 A. Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by v-notched rail shear method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005.
27. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00026-710.1016/S0749-6419(00)00026-7 ↗
28. Altenbach H · Mekhanika kompozitnykh materialov · 2001 · 37 · 731
29. 10.1007/BF0055067110.1007/BF00550671 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0054092510.1007/BF00540925 ↗
31. 10.1016/0020-7683(87)90105-310.1016/0020-7683(87)90105-3 ↗
32. 10.1016/0167-6636(83)90032-710.1016/0167-6636(83)90032-7 ↗
33. Puck A · Kunststoffe–German Plastics · 1992 · 82 · 149
34. Puck A · Kunststoffe Plast Europe · 1996 · 86 · 2
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.008 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-610.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-110.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1 ↗
38. Dávila CG
39. Rosen BW · 1965 · 37
40. 10.1016/B978-0-12-341801-2.50007-210.1016/B978-0-12-341801-2.50007-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/0376-0421(94)00002-310.1016/0376-0421(94)00002-3 ↗
42. 10.1016/0376-0421(94)00003-410.1016/0376-0421(94)00003-4 ↗
43. Mannigel M. Influence of shear stresses on the fibre failure behaviour in carbon fibre reinforced plastics , PhD Thesis, Von der Fakultät für Maschinenwesen der Rheinisch-Westfälischen (RWTH), Technischen Hochschule Aachen, 2007.
44. Li X. Comparative study on the failure behaviour of advanced carbon-epoxy composites . MSc Thesis, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, 2007.
45. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00125-210.1016/S0266-3538(02)00125-2 ↗
46. 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/30210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.00510.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.005 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.006 ↗
49. Kaddour AS and Hinton MJ. Input data for test cases used in benchmarking triaxial failure theories of composites. J Compos Mater 2012; 46: 2295–2312.10.1177/0021998312449886 ↗
50. Kaddour AS and Hinton MJ. Benchmarking of triaxial failure criteria for composite laminates: comparison between models of ‘Part (A)’ of ‘WWFE-II’. J Compos Mater 2012; 46: 2595–2634.10.1177/0021998312449887 ↗