Skin thickness effects on failure mechanisms in foam infilled composite sandwich structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Sandwich structures are often prone to catastrophic failure due to premature separation between the core and skin layers. Geometric parameters, such as the thickness of the skin and core, along with the materials used in their manufacturing, directly influence the resistance to separation between the skin and core. This study explores how variations in skin thickness affect both failure modes and maximum load capacity in sandwich structures, utilizing both experimental testing and numerical simulations. Specimens were categorized as intact and pre-debonded samples. Each specimen featured four different skin thicknesses (3, 6, 8, and 10 layers of composite laminated skins, with corresponding thicknesses of 0.68, 1.33, 1.73, and 2.1 mm respectively). The specimens incorporated a foam-filled square corrugated core and underwent 3-point bending tests. Results revealed a significant shift in the failure mode: initially observed as upper skin fracture (V-shaped failure), it transitioned to separation between skins and cores with increased skin thickness, particularly in the presence of pre-debonding. Notably, the predominant failure mode did not involve separation between the skin and core in specimens without a pre-existing crack. Furthermore, numerical simulations effectively demonstrated the accurate capture of failure modes and loads using the Hashin and cohesive zone model (CZM).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto de Ciência e Inovação Em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial (INEGI), Porto, Portugal
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Faculdade de Engenharia (FEUP), Universidade Do Porto, Porto, Portugal
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ma1619646810.3390/ma16196468 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10696010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106960 ↗
3. 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2014.03.02610.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2014.03.026 ↗
4. 10.1080/15376494.2018.152562810.1080/15376494.2018.1525628 ↗
5. Malekinejad Bahabadi H · Mdrsjrns · 2016 · 16 · 52
6. 10.1177/109963620200400314010.1177/1099636202004003140 ↗
7. 10.22068/JSTC.2018.2990610.22068/JSTC.2018.29906 ↗
8. Effects of foam core density and face-sheet thickness on the mechanical properties of aluminum foam sandwich.” Available at: https://www.techno-press.org/content/?page=article&journal=scs&volume=21&num=5&ordernum=11# (Accessed Oct 07, 2021).
9. Farrokhabadi A · Sandwich Composites · 2022 · 18
10. 10.1088/2631-6331/ac8d7a10.1088/2631-6331/ac8d7a ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.000040910.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000409 ↗
12. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2009.03.00510.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2009.03.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.10518210.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105182 ↗
14. 10.1080/15376494.2013.82881510.1080/15376494.2013.828815 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10764510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107645 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831989065610.1177/0021998319890656 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199830404247610.1177/0021998304042476 ↗
18. 10.1177/0021998322115042910.1177/00219983221150429 ↗
19. 10.1177/0954406223121761410.1177/09544062231217614 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.03510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.035 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.10.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2006.10.007 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.01610.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.016 ↗
24. 10.1680/jemmr.21.0008210.1680/jemmr.21.00082 ↗
25. 10.1007/s44245-022-00006-z10.1007/s44245-022-00006-z ↗
26. 10.1007/s12206-018-0619-510.1007/s12206-018-0619-5 ↗
27. Hartoni · Int J Mech Eng Technol · 2017 · 8
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.05710.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.057 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.03510.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.035 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2035210.1002/pc.20352 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.06.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2004.06.010 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.031 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.18410.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.184 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.004 ↗
35. Range TP, “Composite reinforcements fabric and tape product range.” Available at: https://www.colan.com.au/media/wysiwyg/Downloads/Composite_Reinforcemnt_Catalogue.pdf
36. Airex C70/3A Composites Core Materials. 3A composites core materials. Switzerland: Airex AG, 2011, pp. 1–3.
37. 2020
38. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.03010.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.030 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.006 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.011 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.003 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.05.00610.1016/j.tws.2013.05.006 ↗
43. Sharaf TA · 2010
44. 10.12989/scs.2022.45.3.46710.12989/scs.2022.45.3.467 ↗
45. 10.1115/1.315774410.1115/1.3157744 ↗
46. Nelson JW · Wind Energ Sci · 2017 · 1
47. 10.12989/scs.2016.21.5.114510.12989/scs.2016.21.5.1145 ↗
48. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
49. 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00058-010.1016/S0263-8223(98)00058-0 ↗
50. 10.1177/168781401666741810.1177/1687814016667418 ↗
51. Harper P · 2009
52. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.04310.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.043 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.07.00310.1016/j.commatsci.2010.07.003 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.10518210.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105182 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11758010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117580 ↗
56. Mário Alexandre de Jesus Garrido. Composite sandwich panel floors for building rehabilitation. Tecnico Lisboa. University Of Lisbon Instituto Superior Técnico, 2016.