Strain response of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites subjected to stress-rupture with stochastic load at intermediate temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
To ensure the reliability and safety of ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) hot-section components used in the aero engines, it is necessary to perform the strain response of CMCs at intermediate temperatures (600 to 1000 °C) under stress-rupture with stochastic loading. In this paper, the strain response of SiC/SiC composite under stress-rupture with stochastic load at intermediate temperatures is investigated. Multiple damage mechanisms of matrix cracking, interface debonding and oxidation, and fiber’s oxidation and fracture are considered. Matrix crack spacing, interface oxidation and debonding length, fiber’s broken probability, and intact fiber’s stress are determined using micromechanical damage models. Experimental strain response and internal damage evolution of SiC/SiC composite under constant and stochastic stress are predicted. Effects of stochastic stress level and stochastic time, material properties, damage state and environment temperature on composite’s strain response and stress-rupture life are discussed. When stochastic stress level and environment temperature increase, the composite’s strain at the stochastic stress increases, the time for the interface complete debonding and oxidation decreases, and the stress-rupture life decreases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, PR China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-981-13-1783-510.1007/978-981-13-1783-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.12810.1016/j.msea.2008.09.128 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.011 ↗
6. Rebillat F. · 2014
7. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00062-610.1016/S1359-835X(97)00062-6 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.013 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1002018210.3390/ma10020182 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.02.01210.1016/j.msea.2017.02.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00138-210.1016/S0955-2219(00)00138-2 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01408.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01408.x ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.01536.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.01536.x ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.013 ↗
16. 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90124-510.1016/0001-6160(85)90124-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90189-L10.1016/0956-7151(92)90189-L ↗
18. 10.1016/0022-5096(95)00008-710.1016/0022-5096(95)00008-7 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03266.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03266.x ↗
20. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00189-710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00189-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00393-810.1016/S1359-6454(03)00393-8 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11029-013-9382-y10.1007/s11029-013-9382-y ↗
23. 10.1007/s11029-015-9507-610.1007/s11029-015-9507-6 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11029-018-9729-510.1007/s11029-018-9729-5 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00888.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00888.x ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03087.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03087.x ↗
27. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90246-O10.1016/0956-7151(93)90246-O ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0094896210.1007/BF00948962 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
30. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00148-110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00148-1 ↗