journal article·2019-10

Application of structural health monitoring techniques to composite wing panels

Fulvio Romano, Monica Ciminello, Assunta Sorrentino, Umberto Mercurio

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 53· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

This detailed study proposes a structural health monitoring system which enables the identification, localisation, and correct measurement analysis, in relation to the damage and debonding induced by low energy impacts within aircraft composite wing panels. The said system has been envisaged as an offline system which aims to be considered as a valid alternative method in relation to the current first two maintenance approach levels: visual inspection, which is to be followed if necessary by ultrasonic scanning techniques. The architecture includes two different technologies which act at different frequency ranges: high-frequency sensors/actuators piezoceramics and low-frequency distributed fiber optic sensors. Experimental and numerical results on small stiffened panels are illustrated in this study, where technological verification and validation have been assessed within a laboratory-controlled environment. In addition, the potential benefit by utilising such techniques within the design of the aircraft composite structures has also been illustrated; in comparison with the current aircraft composite structures, a higher weight saving and better performing structures is foreseen.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CIRA – Italian Aerospace Research Centre, Italy

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. EASA AMC 20-29. Composite aircraft structure. 26 July 2010. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/Annex%20II%20-%20AMC%2020-29.pdf (accessed 28 February 2019).
2. Herszberg I, Bannister M K, Li HCH, et al. Structural health monitoring for advanced composite structures. In: Proceedings of 16th international conference on composite materials , Kyoto, Japan, 2007, http://iccm-central.org/Proceedings/ICCM16proceedings/contents/pdf/Pl/Pl-03pl_herszbergi223401p.pdf (accessed 28 February 2019).
3. 10.1017/S000192400000224410.1017/S0001924000002244 ↗
4. Boller C and Biemans C. Structural health monitoring in aircraft – state of the art, perspectives and benefits in structural health monitoring: current status and perspectives . Stanford, CA, U.S: Technomics Publishing Company, 1997, pp.541–552.
5. SAE International. Aerospace recommended practise. Guidelines for implementation of structural health monitoring on fixed wing aircraft. 2013. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, USA.
6. Romano F. Design of composite stiffened panels by new design criteria and progressive failure analysis . PhD thesis, Aerospace Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Italy, 2015. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42948607.pdf.
7. Kassapoglou C. Design and analysis of composite structures with applications to aerospace structures . U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.10.1002/9780470972700 ↗
8. Baaran J. Visual inspection of composite structures. Institute of Composite Structures and Adaptive Systems DLR Braunschweig Lilienthalplatz 7, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany, 9 July 2009. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224990495_Visual_Inspection_of_Composite_Structures (accessed 28 February 2019).
9. Romano F, Sorrentino A, Pellone L, et al. New Design Paradigms and Approaches for Aircraft Composite Structures. International Journal of Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design (MMED), Springer International Publishing, 10th October 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-018-0034-8. Print ISSN: 2520-8160. Online ISSN: 2520-8179.10.1007/s41939-018-0034-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.16210.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.162 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.149127210.1115/1.1491272 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.02010.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020 ↗
13. 10.1515/meceng-2017-001710.1515/meceng-2017-0017 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.67610.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.676 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.04810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.048 ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/2/00410.1088/0964-1726/16/2/004 ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.542.19310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.542.193 ↗
18. 10.1177/147592170404187410.1177/1475921704041874 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.08910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.089 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.005 ↗
21. 10.1177/095440621668205310.1177/0954406216682053 ↗
22. Sorrentino A and De Fenza A. Damage detection in complex composite material structures by using elliptical triangulation method. In: Proceedings of 11th IWSHM – international workshop on structural health monitoring , Stanford, California, USA, 12–14 September 2017.10.12783/shm2017/14042 ↗
23. 10.1177/147592171036526310.1177/1475921710365263 ↗
24. Shapira O, Ben‐Simon U, Bergman A, et al. Structural health monitoring of a UAV fleet using fiber optic distributed strain sensing. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, 1–3 September 2015.10.12783/SHM2015/371 ↗
25. 10.3390/s15081866610.3390/s150818666 ↗
26. Ciminello M, Concilio A, Galasso B, et al. Skinstringer debonding detection using distributed dispersion index features. Struct Health Monit J 2018; 17(5): 1245–1254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718758980.10.1177/1475921718758980 ↗
27. Dost EF, Ilcewicz LB, Avery WB, et al. Effect of stacking sequence on impact damage resistance and residual strength for quasi‐isotropic laminates. ASTM STP 1991; 1110, 1991; 476–500.10.1520/STP17733S ↗
28. 10.1163/15685510332298655610.1163/156855103322986556 ↗
29. 10.1017/CBO978051157450410.1017/CBO9780511574504 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.311950010.1115/1.3119500 ↗
31. 10.1115/1.311106510.1115/1.3111065 ↗
32. 10.1520/CTR10113J10.1520/CTR10113J ↗
33. 10.1520/CTR10131J10.1520/CTR10131J ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.008 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.026 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00072-010.1016/S1359-835X(01)00072-0 ↗
37. Tsai SW. Strength characteristics of composite materials. NASA CR-224, April 1965. Washington D. C., USA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650012040.pdf (accessed 28 February 2019).
38. 10.1007/BF0232629210.1007/BF02326292 ↗
39. 10.1177/00219983670010021010.1177/002199836700100210 ↗
40. Hahn HT · Astronaut Aeronaut · 1983 · 21 · 58
41. ASTM D 7136/D 7136M – 07. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event.
42. ASTM D 7137/D 7137M – 07. Standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite plates.
43. Luna. https://lunainc.com/ (accessed 28 February 2019).
44. 10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/31010.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 ↗
45. 10.3390/s1709209710.3390/s17092097 ↗
46. Borrelli R · J Adv Compos Lett · 2015 · 24 · 57
47. 10.1108/IJSI-06-2012-001710.1108/IJSI-06-2012-0017 ↗