journal article·2026-08

Unveiling pressing effects in FDMSP metal–composite parts using in-situ µCT testing

Waleed Khalid Abdullah Alturki, Haris Ali Khan, Hafiz Qasim Ali, Mehmet Serhat Aydin, Abdullah Khan, Kamal Mustafa

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 60· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

This research focuses on enhancing the utilization of the Fused Deposition Modeling and Sintering (FDMS) process for metal parts by incorporating a pressing step to improve densification and mechanical properties. The study employed aluminum powder in a PLA matrix as the feedstock material and began with process window determination through Finite Element Analysis (FEA). This step mitigated issues such as excessive deformation and void/shrinkage formation in the mid-regions of the parts. Subsequently, defect-free parts underwent heat treatment for debinding and sintering, followed by a pressing operation. Density measurements were performed on three sample types: 3D printed parts, FDMS parts, and Fused Deposition Modeling, Sintering, and Pressing (FDMSP) parts. The FDMSP parts exhibited the highest density, highlighting the significant role of the pressing step. Compressive strength testing revealed an approximate 20% increase in strength for FDMSP specimens compared to FDMS specimens. Additionally, in-situ compression tests aided by µCT analysis revealed that the FDMS specimens initially exhibited a porosity of ∼40%, which decreased to ∼26% after applying a compressive force of 10 kN, underscoring the contribution of the pressing step to compaction. Furthermore, the tests showed an increase in aluminum agglomeration, attributed to the deformation of the PLA matrix under compression, facilitating the redistribution of aluminum particles. These findings confirm the pressing operation’s contribution to improving density and compressive strength, providing a pathway to enhance FDMS processes for metal part manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST)

University of Bergen

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11837-023-06324-110.1007/s11837-023-06324-1 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00170-024-14789-w10.1007/s00170-024-14789-w ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11113510.1016/j.tws.2023.111135 ↗
4. Khan HA Ademujimi T. Development of a novel hybrid manufacturing technique for manufacturing support structures free complex parts. In International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference 2019 June (Vol. 58745 p. V001T02A022). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/MSEC2019-2928 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11665-024-10445-210.1007/s11665-024-10445-2 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00170-024-14704-310.1007/s00170-024-14704-3 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11665-024-10438-110.1007/s11665-024-10438-1 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.406272710.1115/1.4062727 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.404353610.1115/1.4043536 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10103710.1016/j.addma.2020.101037 ↗
11. 10.31875/2410-4701.2021.08.710.31875/2410-4701.2021.08.7 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00170-015-7077-310.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 ↗
13. 10.3390/app1103121310.3390/app11031213 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.405082410.1115/1.4050824 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.02410.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.024 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11661-021-06211-x10.1007/s11661-021-06211-x ↗
17. Wu G Langrana NA Rangarajan S et al. Fabrication of metal components using FDMet: fused deposition of metals. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin TX USA 9–11 August 1999 pp. 11–13.
18. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10346310.1016/j.addma.2023.103463 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-021-06785-110.1007/s00170-021-06785-1 ↗
20. 10.3390/met1305085910.3390/met13050859 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12725210.1016/j.matlet.2019.127252 ↗
22. 10.12913/22998624/7099610.12913/22998624/70996 ↗
23. 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-001710.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2550810.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25508 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.03410.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.034 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1311249310.3390/ma13112493 ↗
27. 10.3390/app1104144410.3390/app11041444 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00170-018-1953-610.1007/s00170-018-1953-6 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym1613186810.3390/polym16131868 ↗
30. 10.1108/IJSI-07-2025-017110.1108/IJSI-07-2025-0171 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.06.01710.1016/j.jmapro.2024.06.017 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11837-018-3207-310.1007/s11837-018-3207-3 ↗
33. 10.1002/masy.20200027510.1002/masy.202000275 ↗
34. Aluminum 6061 Filamet. https://shop.thevirtualfoundry.com/collections/metal-filament/products/aluminum-6061-filamet. Accessed 24 November 2024.
35. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.03210.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.032 ↗
36. Arvieu C, Galy C, Le Guen E, et al. Relative density of SLM-produced aluminum alloy parts: interpretation of results. J Manuf Mater Process 2020; 4(3): 83.
37. 10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y ↗
38. Costanzo A, Spotorno R, Candal MV, et al. Residual alignment and its effect on weld strength in material-extrusion 3D-printing of polylactic acid. Addit Manuf 2020; 36: 101415.
39. 10.3390/app903058310.3390/app9030583 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-510.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10841310.1016/j.matdes.2019.108413 ↗