journal article·2025-02Open access

Numerical modeling and experimental validation of low velocity impact of woven GFRP/CFRP composites

Drew E Sommer, Katherine Berkowitz, Brian T Werner, Kevin N Long, Alyssa J Skulborstad

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 59· Issue 3

Abstract

Low-velocity impact of 2D woven glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite laminates was studied experimentally and numerically. Hybrid laminates containing blocked layers of GFRP/CFRP/GFRP with all plies oriented at 0° were investigated. Relatively high impact energies were used to obtain full perforation of the laminate in a low-velocity impact setup. Numerical simulations were carried out using the in-house transient dynamics finite element code, Sierra/SM, developed at Sandia National Laboratories. A three-dimensional continuum damage model was used to describe the response of a woven composite ply. Two methods for handling delamination were considered and compared: (1) cohesive zone modeling and (2) continuum damage mechanics. The reduced model size achieved by omission of the cohesive zone elements produced acceptable results at reduced computational cost. The comparison between different modeling techniques can be used to inform modeling decisions relevant to low velocity impact scenarios. The modeling was validated by comparing with the experimental results and showed good agreement in terms of predicted damage mechanisms and impactor velocity and force histories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Engineering Sciences Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Mechanics of Materials, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, USA

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823979-7.00002-810.1016/B978-0-12-823979-7.00002-8 ↗
2. Laurin F, Chaibi S, Rannou J, et al. Experimental characterization and numerical modeling of damages induced by low-velocity impacts in recent composite materials. In: 11th Comptest conference, Gerona, Spain, 31-2 June. 2023.
3. 10.1177/00219983880220010310.1177/002199838802200103 ↗
4. Stephen C · Eng Sci · 2022 · 18 · 75
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.053 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.08.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2004.08.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.018 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1301012910.3390/ma13010129 ↗
10. Heimbs S. Bird strike simulations on composite aircraft structures. In SIMULIA Customer Conference, Barcelona, 2011, pp. 73–86.
11. 10.1080/13588265.2017.134252110.1080/13588265.2017.1342521 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10703310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107033 ↗
13. 10.1177/0021998323120199710.1177/00219983231201997 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.12.01910.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.12.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11469410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114694 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00111-710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00111-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11114810.1016/j.tws.2023.111148 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.03.01010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.03.010 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.019 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.031 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.016 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.014 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.06210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.062 ↗
26. 10.5772/6151110.5772/61511 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.021 ↗
28. 10.1177/00219983910250050310.1177/002199839102500503 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.08.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.08.006 ↗
30. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00002-210.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00002-2 ↗
31. 10.1177/00219983990330110510.1177/002199839903301105 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.013 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.023 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.016 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11436310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114363 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.04910.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.049 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cja.2019.10.00910.1016/j.cja.2019.10.009 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.13710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.137 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.001 ↗
40. Haque BZG · MAT162 User Manual · 2015 · 10
41. 10.12783/asc38/3656010.12783/asc38/36560 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.017 ↗
43. ASTM Committee D30 on Composite Materials · 2015
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11527810.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115278 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.10999710.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109997 ↗
46. Beckwith FN · 2021
47. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.09.00210.1016/j.jmps.2005.09.002 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.005 ↗
49. John PP · 2007
50. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.033 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.09710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.097 ↗
52. Baber F · Mech Adv Mater Struct · 2023 · 1