Microstructure, wear and corrosion characteristics of Cu matrix reinforced SiC–graphite hybrid composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of SiC-graphite reinforcement on the properties of pure copper. Copper matrix composites with SiC-graphite reinforcement (0, 2.5,5, 7.5 and 10 wt.%) were prepared by stir casting process. Microstructure, phase, density, hardness and wear rate of prepared samples have been investigated. X-ray diffraction revealed that there is no intermediate phase formation between the reinforcement and matrix as a result of interfacial bonding between them. Microstructure study shows the uniform distribution of SiC-graphite particles in the Cu-matrix. Mechanical and corrosion properties of these Cu matrix MMCs were found to be dependent on the reinforcement content. Hardness was found to decrease with the addition of graphite due to its soft nature. Composite containing 5 wt.% reinforcement has shown minimum wear rate and maximum corrosion resistance. It is expected that the present composite will be useful for thermal management applications especially in heat exchangers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced materials and composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Alakh Prakash Goyal Shimla University, India
Department of Ceramic Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), India
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia
Centre for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Qatar
Department of Mechanical Engineering, A.S.E.T., Amity University, India
Funding
Qatar National Research Fund
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/135065011350893410.1177/1350650113508934 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.triboint.2010.11.00810.1016/j.triboint.2010.11.008 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12034-013-0545-110.1007/s12034-013-0545-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.02.01410.1016/j.triboint.2008.02.014 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00365-310.1016/S0167-577X(03)00365-3 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0054444810.1007/BF00544448 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.04.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2010.04.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.02310.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.023 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11106-018-9925-910.1007/s11106-018-9925-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.11.03810.1016/j.triboint.2017.11.038 ↗
11. Singh N · J Mater Environ Sci · 2017 · 8 · 1654
12. 10.1063/1.499985810.1063/1.4999858 ↗
13. Rajkumar K and Aravindan S. Mechanical, electrical, and tribological properties of copper–graphite composites. In: Kar KK (ed.) Composite Materials . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2017, pp.433–455.10.1007/978-3-662-49514-8_13 ↗
14. 10.1177/002199831349491510.1177/0021998313494915 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.10.04510.1016/j.jpcs.2017.10.045 ↗
16. Singh N, Parkash O and Kumar D. Wear behavior of ZrO2 particle reinforced (Fe,Ni) matrix composite. In: 7th International conference on fracture, fatigue and wear , July 2018, pp.682–690. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-0411-8_61 ↗
17. Attar S · Int J Emerg Technol Innov Res · 2015 · 2 · 225
18. 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.05210.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.052 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.30910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.309 ↗
20. Poddar P · J Metall Mater Sci · 2017 · 59 · 153
21. 10.1023/B:TRIL.0000017423.70725.1c10.1023/B:TRIL.0000017423.70725.1c ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.01910.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.08.07910.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.08.079 ↗
24. 10.1039/C4TC01037J10.1039/C4TC01037J ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.13410.1016/j.snb.2016.04.134 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.11.03110.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.11.031 ↗