journal article·2020-09

Influence of aggressive environmental aging on mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of Ultra Violet (UV) Cured in Place Pipe liners

Md Nuruddin, Kayli DeCocker, Seyedeh Mahboobeh Teimouri Sendesi, Andrew J Whelton, Jeffrey P Youngblood, John A Howarter

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 54· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Ultraviolet light cured-in-place pipe is a popular trenchless rehabilitation technology used to repair existing buried pipelines without soil excavation. A polymer composite liner is manufactured directly in the field. After curing is complete, the new liner is placed in service to convey flowing water. Long-term water exposure has the potential to degrade the fiber reinforced cured-in-place pipe liners. Like other composites, liner hygrothermal stability could be a major challenge, especially for undercured materials. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of aggressive environmental conditions such as water, salt solution, and simulated concrete pore solution at 50℃ on cured-in-place pipe liner mechanical and thermo-mechanical performance. Liners were exposed to aqueous solutions ranging from a typical exposure environment to a very aggressive alkaline environment. Cured-in-place pipe liner samples were collected from New York storm sewer installation sites. Specimens were assessed for the degree of curing as determined by differential scanning calorimetry and TGA. Samples were then immersed in aforementioned solutions for investigating the stability of the liners as a function of degree of cure. Both interlaminar shear strength and thermo-mechanical properties significantly differed based on the degree of cure. Cured-in-place pipe liner mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties were significantly impacted by water, salt, and pore solutions exposure. Long-term exposure to salt and alkaline environments may have a detrimental effect on the performance of cured-in-place pipe liners and desires additional scrutiny.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, USA

Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, USA

Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Purdue University, USA

Funding

Transportation agencies in Virginia · National Science Foundation

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.000021610.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000216 ↗
2. Hutchinson MW. North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT) Learning about UV CIPP versus Steam and Water Cure CIPP in Portland Oregon. City of Portland, Portland Oregon, 2018.
3. 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b0023710.1021/acs.estlett.7b00237 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.09710.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.097 ↗
5. Whelton AJ, Ra K, Mahboobeh S, et al. Contaminant release from storm water culvert rehabilitation technologies: Understanding implications to the environment and long-term material integrity (U.S. Federal Highway Administration Transportation Pooled Fund (TPF)-5(339)). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317089.10.5703/1288284317089 ↗
6. 10.1080/08958378.2019.162196610.1080/08958378.2019.1621966 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.08010.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.080 ↗
8. Granite Inliner. UV light-cured CIPP, http://inliner.com/uploads/pdfstxbrochure.pdf (accessed 10 March 2020).
9. 10.1002/awwa.104210.1002/awwa.1042 ↗
10. Ajdari EB · 2016
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:4(214)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:4(214) ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.000023110.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000231 ↗
13. Riahi AM · 2015
14. 10.1080/23311916.2018.146359410.1080/23311916.2018.1463594 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.00210.1016/j.tust.2012.02.002 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831983913210.1177/0021998319839132 ↗
17. 10.1023/A:100476641896610.1023/A:1004766418966 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60087-410.1016/S1005-0302(10)60087-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.034 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.10.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2006.10.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.06.02510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.06.025 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00076-610.1016/S0266-3538(97)00076-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/0010-4361(82)90151-310.1016/0010-4361(82)90151-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.021 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.015 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.02310.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.023 ↗
27. 10.1177/002199830203601797710.1177/0021998302036017977 ↗
28. SAERTEX Multicom GmbH. SAERTEX-S-Liner, SAERTEX-M-Liner product safety data sheet. Saerbeck Germany, 2009.
29. DSM. ATLAC® E-Nova RE 3475 Safety data sheet. Schaffhausen, Switzerland, 2011.
30. DSM. ATLAC® E-NOVA RE 3475 Product Data Sheet. Schaffhausen, Switzerland, 2013.
31. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.01910.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.019 ↗
32. ASTM D543 − 14. Standard practices for evaluating the resistance of plastics to chemical reagents.
33. ASTM D618 − 13. Standard practice for conditioning plastics for testing.
34. ASTM D2344/D2344M − 16. Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates.
35. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.008 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.006 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.009 ↗
38. 10.1021/i300001a01810.1021/i300001a018 ↗
39. Soulier JP · Polym Commun · 1988 · 29 · 243
40. 10.1177/002199831347796310.1177/0021998313477963 ↗
41. 10.1002/app.2217910.1002/app.22179 ↗
42. 10.1177/002199830505203010.1177/0021998305052030 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.011 ↗
44. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<483::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<483::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
45. Salehi M · J Appl Polym Sci · 2016 · 43724 · 1
46. Chakraverty AP, Mohanty UK, Mishra SC et al. Sea water ageing of GFRP composites and the dissolved salts. IOP conference series: Mater Sci Eng 2015; 75: 012029.10.1088/1757-899X/75/1/012029 ↗
47. 10.1002/pc.1053810.1002/pc.10538 ↗
48. Maxwell AS · NPL Report DEPC MPR · 16 · 2005
49. 10.1016/0015-0568(83)90017-910.1016/0015-0568(83)90017-9 ↗
50. 10.1080/1023666070151655710.1080/10236660701516557 ↗
51. Caceres A, Jamond RM, Hoffard TA, et al. Salt-fog accelerated testing of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites. NFESC No. TR-2215-SHR, Port Hueneme, CA: Naval Facilities Engineering, 2002.10.21236/ADA409960 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10853-017-1627-z10.1007/s10853-017-1627-z ↗
53. Kouassi SS · Ceramics-Silikáty · 2010 · 54 · 235
54. 10.1155/2013/35263910.1155/2013/352639 ↗
55. 10.1080/15583724.2015.107835210.1080/15583724.2015.1078352 ↗
56. 10.1177/002199831140106410.1177/0021998311401064 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.052 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.043 ↗
59. Al-Assafi S and Mosallam A. Impact of aqueous environments on performance of pultruded composites. In: Proceedings of HBRC international conference on future vision and challenges for urban development , Cairo, Egypt, 2004, pp. 20–24.
60. Bagherpour S. Fibre reinforced polyester composites. In: Saleh HED Polyester . London: IntechOpen, 2012, pp. 135–166.10.5772/48697 ↗
61. 10.1177/002199830606726510.1177/0021998306067265 ↗
62. 10.33915/etd.114110.33915/etd.1141 ↗