The effect of Reynolds number on the propulsive efficiency of a biomorphic pulsed-jet underwater vehicle
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of Reynolds number on the propulsive efficiency of pulsed-jet propulsion was studied experimentally on a self-propelled, pulsed-jet underwater vehicle, dubbed Robosquid due to the similarity of its propulsion system with squid. Robosquid was tested for jet slug length-to-diameter ratios (L/D) in the range 2-6 and dimensionless frequency (St(L)) in the range 0.2-0.6 in a glycerin-water mixture. Digital particle image velocimetry was used for measuring the impulse and energy of jet pulses from the velocity and vorticity fields of the jet flow to calculate the pulsed-jet propulsive efficiency, and compare it with an equivalent steady jet system. Robosquid's Reynolds number (Re) based on average vehicle velocity and vehicle diameter ranged between 37 and 60. The current results for propulsive efficiency were compared to the previously published results in water where Re ranged between 1300 and 2700. The results showed that the average propulsive efficiency decreased by 26% as the average Re decreased from 2000 to 50 while the ratio of pulsed-jet to steady jet efficiency (η(P)/η(P, ss)) increased up to 0.15 (26%) as the Re decreased over the same range and for similar pulsing conditions. The improved η(P)/η(P, ss) at lower Re suggests that pulsed-jet propulsion can be used as an efficient propulsion system for millimeter-scale propulsion applications. The Re = 37-60 conditions in the present investigation, showed a reduced dependence of η(P) and η(P)/η(P, ss)on L/D compared to higher Re results. This may be due to the lack of clearly observed vortex ring pinch-off as L/D increased for this Re regime.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Micro and Nano Robotics · Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1242/jeb.02694810.1242/jeb.026948 ↗
2. 10.1093/icb/icn04310.1093/icb/icn043 ↗
3. 10.1242/jeb.02777110.1242/jeb.027771 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.217143910.1115/1.2171439 ↗
5. 10.1017/S002211200900700910.1017/S0022112009007009 ↗
6. 10.1242/jeb.0224210.1242/jeb.02242 ↗
7. Fukuda T · Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 94) · 1994 · 273
8. 10.1017/S002211209700841010.1017/S0022112097008410 ↗
9. 10.1109/20.80063210.1109/20.800632 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.158443610.1063/1.1584436 ↗
11. 10.1017/S002211200600934710.1017/S0022112006009347 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.156460010.1063/1.1564600 ↗
13. 10.2514/1.997810.2514/1.9978 ↗
14. Moslemi A A · Bioinspir. Biomim. · 2010 · 5 · 03600310.1088/1748-3182/5/3/036003 ↗
15. Prandtl L · Essentials of Fluid Dynamics · 1952
16. 10.1119/1.1090310.1119/1.10903 ↗
17. 10.1017/S002211201000490810.1017/S0022112010004908 ↗
18. 10.1109/JOE.2004.83321610.1109/JOE.2004.833216 ↗
19. 10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.3310.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.33 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00348005008210.1007/s003480050082 ↗
21. White F M · Viscous Fluid Flow 3rd edn · 2006
22. 10.1007/BF0019038810.1007/BF00190388 ↗