Extracting textural features from tactile sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper describes an experiment to quantify texture using an artificial finger equipped with a microphone to detect frictional sound. Using a microphone to record tribological data is a biologically inspired approach that emulates the Pacinian corpuscle. Artificial surfaces were created to constrain the subsequent analysis to specific textures. Recordings of the artificial surfaces were made to create a library of frictional sounds for data analysis. These recordings were mapped to the frequency domain using fast Fourier transforms for direct comparison, manipulation and quantifiable analysis. Numerical features such as modal frequency and average value were calculated to analyze the data and compared with attributes generated from principal component analysis (PCA). It was found that numerical features work well for highly constrained data but cannot classify multiple textural elements. PCA groups textures according to a natural similarity. Classification of the recordings using k nearest neighbors shows a high accuracy for PCA data. Clustering of the PCA data shows that similar discs are grouped together with few classification errors. In contrast, clustering of numerical features produces erroneous classification by splitting discs between clusters. The temperature of the finger is shown to have a direct relation to some of the features and subsequent data in PCA.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Robot Manipulation and Learning · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Alpaydin E · Introduction to Machine Learning · 2004
2. 10.1108/0143991051059396510.1108/01439910510593965 ↗
3. Edwards J · Haptic Representation Website · 2007
4. Fend M Bovet S Yokoi H Pfeifer R · Proc. Intelligent Robots and System · 2003 · 2 · 1044
5. Kandel E R · Principles of Neural Science · 2000 · 433
6. 10.1016/j.triboint.2007.01.00410.1016/j.triboint.2007.01.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.triboint.2007.01.00410.1016/j.triboint.2007.01.004 ↗
8. 10.1007/11941354_4110.1007/11941354_41 ↗
9. 10.1177/02783649000190070210.1177/027836490001900702 ↗
10. Martinot F Plenacoste P Chaillou C · 1st Int. Conf. on Sensing Technology 2005 · 2005 · 615
11. Mayol-Cuevas W-W Juiirez-Guerrero J Mufioz-Gutierrez S · IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 98 · 1999 · 5 · 4246
12. Mitchell T · Machine Learning · 1997
13. Shadow Robot Company: Shop · 2007
14. Shlens J · A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis · 2005
15. Murray-Smith R · Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems · 2008 · 129910.1145/1357054.1357257 ↗
16. 10.1108/0143991051057331810.1108/01439910510573318 ↗
17. Flexiforce Sensor Order Force · 2007
18. 10.1080/1559961070123265510.1080/15599610701232655 ↗
19. Ye X Choi B Kang S Choi H · Proc. 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2007 · 364