Zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavioural response to bioinspired robotic fish and mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis)
Source abstract
Abstract
The field of ethorobotics holds promise in aiding fundamental research in animal behaviour, whereby it affords fully controllable and easily reproducible experimental tools. Most of the current ethorobotics studies are focused on the behavioural response of a selected target species as it interacts with a biologically-inspired robot in controlled laboratory conditions. In this work, we first explore the interactions between two social fish species and a robotic fish, whose design is inspired by salient visual features of one of the species. Specifically, this study investigates the behavioural response of small shoals of zebrafish interacting with a zebrafish-inspired robotic fish and small shoals of mosquitofish in a basic ecological context. Our results demonstrate that the robotic fish differentially influences the behaviour of the two species by consistently attracting zebrafish, while repelling mosquitofish. This selective behavioural control is successful in spatially isolating the two species, which would otherwise exhibit prey-predator interactions, with mosquitofish attacking zebrafish.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications · Fish Ecology and Management Studies · Animal Behavior and Reproduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.01510.1016/j.tree.2011.03.015 ↗
2. Lepora N F · Bioinspir. Biomim. · 2013 · 8
3. Lakhtakia A · Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication · 2012
4. 10.1093/beheco/arr13210.1093/beheco/arr132 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.beproc.2003.10.00310.1016/j.beproc.2003.10.003 ↗
6. Partan S R · Curr. Zool. · 2011 · 57 · 14010.1093/czoolo/57.2.140 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.05.04710.1016/j.bbr.2012.05.047 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00265-010-0988-y10.1007/s00265-010-0988-y ↗
9. 10.1098/rsif.2012.054010.1098/rsif.2012.0540 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsif.2012.008410.1098/rsif.2012.0084 ↗
11. Polverino G · Bioinspir. Biomim. · 2012 · 710.1088/1748-3182/7/3/036019 ↗
12. Takanishi A Aoki T Ito M Ohkawa Y Yamaguchi J · IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 1998 · 1975
13. 10.1126/science.114425910.1126/science.1144259 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.02910.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.029 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0016669610.1007/BF00166696 ↗
16. 10.1038/415279a10.1038/415279a ↗
17. 10.1089/zeb.2006.3.22710.1089/zeb.2006.3.227 ↗
18. 10.1089/zeb.2006.999710.1089/zeb.2006.9997 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.07710.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.077 ↗
20. Reed B · Guidance on the Housing and Care of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) · 2010
21. 10.1007/s00422-005-0576-910.1007/s00422-005-0576-9 ↗
22. 10.3390/molecules1504260910.3390/molecules15042609 ↗
23. 10.1023/A:100191420807510.1023/A:1001914208075 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11160-006-6394-x10.1007/s11160-006-6394-x ↗
25. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.17345110.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173451 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10530-012-0176-210.1007/s10530-012-0176-2 ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1600-0633.1994.tb00110.x10.1111/j.1600-0633.1994.tb00110.x ↗
28. 10.2307/144697910.2307/1446979 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10641-006-9040-510.1007/s10641-006-9040-5 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02045.x10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02045.x ↗
31. Meffe G K · Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (Poeciliidae) · 1989 · 13
32. 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00013.x10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00013.x ↗
33. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98075.x10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98075.x ↗
34. 10.1007/s00265-004-0850-110.1007/s00265-004-0850-1 ↗
35. 10.1093/beheco/arq15210.1093/beheco/arq152 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10530-007-9104-210.1007/s10530-007-9104-2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.00810.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.008 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.00310.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.003 ↗
39. 10.2307/194862710.2307/1948627 ↗
40. 10.1371/journal.pone.005431510.1371/journal.pone.0054315 ↗
41. 10.1006/anbe.2003.211810.1006/anbe.2003.2118 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.12.01010.1016/j.anbehav.2004.12.010 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.00310.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.003 ↗
44. Snekser J L · Int. J. Comp. Psychol. · 2010 · 23 · 7010.46867/IJCP.2010.23.01.04 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00441-002-0570-710.1007/s00441-002-0570-7 ↗
46. 10.1109/MRA.2012.218467210.1109/MRA.2012.2184672 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.00510.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.005 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.01310.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.013 ↗
49. Plaut I · J. Exp. Biol. · 2000 · 203 · 81310.1242/jeb.203.4.813 ↗
50. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00638.x10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00638.x ↗
51. 10.1098/rspb.2009.212810.1098/rspb.2009.2128 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.02310.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.023 ↗
53. Langerhans B R · Evolution · 2004 · 58 · 230510.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01605.x ↗
54. Kraft C E · 2006
55. 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.00110.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.001 ↗