Quadrupedal bounding with a segmented flexible torso: passive stability and feedback control
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the implications of torso flexibility on the dynamics of quadrupedal running are examined in a template setting. In the same vein with the spring loaded inverted pendulum, a reductive sagittal-plane model with a segmented flexible torso and compliant legs is introduced to capture the dynamics of bounding in the presence of torso flexibility via a minimum number of variables and parameters. Numerical return map studies of the system in dimensionless setting reveal that a large variety of cyclic bounding motions can be realized passively, through the natural interaction of the model with its environment. Despite the simplicity of the model, the resulting motions correspond to torso bending movements that resemble those in galloping mammals without explicit reliance on the fine structural and morphological details. Furthermore, for certain combinations of the system parameters--in particular the torso and leg relative stiffness--self-stable bounding motions emerge. The implications of the existence of such self-stable bounding orbits to control design are also discussed and a hybrid control law is derived that is capable of stabilizing the system as it encounters significantly large disturbances using only a single actuator located at the torso joint.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Locomotion and Control · Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Alexander R · Elastic Mechanisms in Animal Movement · 1988
2. Alexander R · Principles of Animal Locomotion · 200310.1515/9781400849512 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04944.x10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04944.x ↗
4. 10.1177/027836490404738910.1177/0278364904047389 ↗
5. Ananthanarayanan A · Bioinspir. Biomim. · 2012 · 710.1088/1748-3182/7/4/046005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.06.03110.1016/j.jtbi.2013.06.031 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10514-010-9216-x10.1007/s10514-010-9216-x ↗
8. Arslan Ö · Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2009 · 2388
9. 10.1177/02783649980170090510.1177/027836499801700905 ↗
10. 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90224-810.1016/0021-9290(89)90224-8 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0019776010.1007/BF00197760 ↗
12. Boston Dynamics · 2012
13. Cao Q · Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2012 · 2484
14. 10.1080/1176232090286390810.1080/11762320902863908 ↗
15. Culha U · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2011 · 139210.1109/ICRA.2011.5980176 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.02.00310.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.02.003 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.288.5463.10010.1126/science.288.5463.100 ↗
18. Fischer M S · J. Exp. Biol. · 2002 · 205 · 131510.1242/jeb.205.9.1315 ↗
19. 10.1177/027836490404739310.1177/0278364904047393 ↗
20. Full R J · J. Exp. Biol. · 1999 · 202 · 332510.1242/jeb.202.23.3325 ↗
21. Gambaryan P P · How Mammals Run: Anatomical Adaptations · 1974
22. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.08.01510.1016/j.jtbi.2004.08.015 ↗
23. 10.1098/rspb.2006.363710.1098/rspb.2006.3637 ↗
24. 10.1137/05062659410.1137/050626594 ↗
25. Guckenheimer J · Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields · 1996 · 42
26. 10.1016/j.crpv.2005.10.01010.1016/j.crpv.2005.10.010 ↗
27. 10.1117/12.92067810.1117/12.920678 ↗
28. Haynes G C · Proc. Dynamic Walking Conf. · 2012
29. 10.1177/0278364012206725510.1177/02783640122067255 ↗
30. 10.2307/137626510.2307/1376265 ↗
31. 10.2307/137724610.2307/1377246 ↗
32. 10.1137/S003614450444513310.1137/S0036144504445133 ↗
33. 10.1177/027836491140863110.1177/0278364911408631 ↗
34. Kim S · 2012
35. 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90042-210.1016/0021-9290(90)90042-2 ↗
36. 10.1177/027836491243961310.1177/0278364912439613 ↗
37. Murphy K N · 1985
38. 10.1007/978-1-4615-9882-4_4310.1007/978-1-4615-9882-4_43 ↗
39. Nanua P · 1992
40. 10.1115/1.279420910.1115/1.2794209 ↗
41. Poulakakis I · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2003 · 1 · 1368
42. 10.1177/027836490606676810.1177/0278364906066768 ↗
43. 10.1177/027836490405091710.1177/0278364904050917 ↗
44. Pouya S · Proc. Dynamic Walking Conf. · 2012
45. 10.1117/12.201607310.1117/12.2016073 ↗
46. Raibert M H · Legged Robots that Balance · 1986
47. 10.1109/JRA.1986.108704410.1109/JRA.1986.1087044 ↗
48. 10.1177/027836490934463510.1177/0278364909344635 ↗
49. Saranli U · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2003 · 1 · 1374
50. Saranli U · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 1998 · 3 · 267610.1109/ROBOT.1998.680750 ↗
51. Satzinger B · Proc. Int. Symp. of Adaptive Motion in Animals and Machines · 2013 · 129
52. 10.1242/jeb.0240010.1242/jeb.02400 ↗
53. Schmiedeler J · ROMANSY 14: Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators · 2002 · 48110.1007/978-3-7091-2552-6_50 ↗
54. Schwab A L · Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. · 2001 · 6 · 531
55. Schwind W J · 1998
56. Seipel J E · ASME Conf. Proc. · 2011 · 855
57. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00245-710.1016/S0021-9290(01)00245-7 ↗
58. 10.1242/jeb.0046310.1242/jeb.00463 ↗
59. Valenzuela A K · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2012 · 1901
60. 10.1242/jeb.0264510.1242/jeb.02645 ↗
61. Wang X · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2011 · 51110.1109/ICRA.2011.5979619 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10514-007-9036-910.1007/s10514-007-9036-9 ↗
63. Witte H · J. Exp. Biol. · 2002 · 205 · 133910.1242/jeb.205.9.1339 ↗
64. Zhang Z G · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2005 · 3 · 2601
65. 10.1163/15685530677736165910.1163/156855306777361659 ↗