Gait studies for a quadrupedal microrobot reveal contrasting running templates in two frequency regimes
Source abstract
Abstract
Performance metrics such as speed, cost of transport, and stability are the driving factors behind gait selection in legged locomotion. To help understand the effect of gait on the performance and dynamics of small-scale ambulation, we explore four quadrupedal gaits over a wide range of stride frequencies on a 1.43 g, biologically-inspired microrobot, the Harvard Ambulatory MicroRobot (HAMR). Despite its small size, HAMR can precisely control leg frequency, phasing, and trajectory, making it an exceptional platform for gait studies at scales relevant to insect locomotion. The natural frequencies of the body dynamics are used to identify frequency regimes where the choice of gait has varying influence on speed and cost of transport (CoT). To further quantify these effects, two new metrics, ineffective stance and stride correlation, are leveraged to capture effects of foot slippage and observed footfall patterns on locomotion performance. At stride frequencies near body resonant modes, gait is found to drastically alter speed and CoT. When running well above these stride frequencies we find a gait-agnostic shift towards energy characteristics that support 'kinematic running', which is defined as a gait with a Froude number greater than one with energy profiles more similar to walking than running. This kinematic running is rapid (8.5 body lengths per second), efficient (CoT = 9.4), different from widely observed SLIP templates of running, and has the potential to simplify design and control for insect-scale runners.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Locomotion and Control · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/3-540-45118-8_2510.1007/3-540-45118-8_25 ↗
2. Baisch A T · 2013
3. 10.1007/978-3-642-19457-3_4210.1007/978-3-642-19457-3_42 ↗
4. 10.1177/027836491452147310.1177/0278364914521473 ↗
5. 10.1109/IROS.2012.638577510.1109/IROS.2012.6385775 ↗
6. Birkmeyer P · IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2009 · 2683
7. 10.1007/BF0019776010.1007/BF00197760 ↗
8. 10.1109/IROS.2015.735419010.1109/IROS.2015.7354190 ↗
9. Cavagna G A · Am. J. Physiol.-Regulatory, Integr. Comparative Physiol. · 1977 · 233 · R24310.1152/ajpregu.1977.233.5.R243 ↗
10. 10.1242/jeb.0197910.1242/jeb.01979 ↗
11. 10.1109/IROS.2015.735395910.1109/IROS.2015.7353959 ↗
12. Doshi N · IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2017
13. Full R · J. Exp. Biol. · 1991 · 158 · 36910.1242/jeb.158.1.369 ↗
14. Full R J · J. Exp. Biol. · 1999 · 202 · 332510.1242/jeb.202.23.3325 ↗
15. 10.1093/icb/42.1.14910.1093/icb/42.1.149 ↗
16. Full R J · J. Exp. Biol. · 1991 · 156 · 21510.1242/jeb.156.1.215 ↗
17. Goldberg B · Under Review: 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2017
18. Goldberg B · IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2017
19. Goldberg B · Under Review: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2017
20. Haldane D W · IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2015 · 4539
21. 10.1115/1.402949510.1115/1.4029495 ↗
22. Haldane D W · IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2013 · 3279
23. Heglund N C · J. Exp. Biol. · 1982 · 97 · 4110.1242/jeb.97.1.41 ↗
24. 10.1016/0022-1910(84)90097-010.1016/0022-1910(84)90097-0 ↗
25. 10.1137/S003614450444513310.1137/S0036144504445133 ↗
26. Hoover A M · IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2008 · 22
27. Jafferis N T · IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2016 · 3234
28. Jafferis N T · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2016 · 2510.1088/0964-1726/25/5/055033 ↗
29. 10.1073/pnas.151459111310.1073/pnas.1514591113 ↗
30. Jindrich D L · J. Exp. Biol. · 2002 · 205 · 280310.1242/jeb.205.18.2803 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.071194410510.1073/pnas.0711944105 ↗
32. Koh J S · Int. Symp. on Experimental Robotics · 2016
33. 10.1038/346265a010.1038/346265a0 ↗
34. Mann J · Essentials of Human Nutrition · 2012
35. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.104110.1098/rsbl.2009.1041 ↗
36. Mazouchova N · Bioinspiration Biomimetics · 2013 · 810.1088/1748-3182/8/2/026007 ↗
37. 10.1109/TRO.2012.219851010.1109/TRO.2012.2198510 ↗
38. 10.1109/LRA.2016.252360310.1109/LRA.2016.2523603 ↗
39. 10.1242/jeb.02688010.1242/jeb.026880 ↗
40. Roberts S F · IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2016
41. Rubenstein M · IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2012 · 3293
42. 10.1242/jeb.12865210.1242/jeb.128652 ↗
43. 10.1109/ROBIO.2014.709042810.1109/ROBIO.2014.7090428 ↗
44. Sreetharan P S · J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2012 · 2210.1088/0960-1317/22/5/055027 ↗
45. Strogatz S H · Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering · 2014
46. Ting L · J. Exp. Biol. · 1994 · 197 · 25110.1242/jeb.197.1.251 ↗
47. Vogtmann D · IEEE 30th Int. Conf. on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems · 2017 · 179