Design and energetic evaluation of a prosthetic knee joint actuator with a lockable parallel spring
Source abstract
Abstract
There are disadvantages to existing damping knee prostheses which cause an asymmetric gait and higher metabolic cost during level walking compared to non-amputees. Most existing active knee prostheses which could benefit the amputees use a significant amount of energy and require a considerable motor. In this work, a novel semi-active actuator with a lockable parallel spring for a prosthetic knee joint has been developed and tested. This actuator is able to provide an approximation of the behavior of a healthy knee during most of the gait cycle of level walking. This actuator is expanded with a series-elastic actuator to mimic the full gait cycle and enable its use in other functional tasks like stair climbing and sit-to-stance. The proposed novel actuator reduces the energy consumption for the same trajectory with respect to a compliant or directly-driven prosthetic active knee joint and improves the approximation of healthy knee behavior during level walking compared to passive or variable damping knee prostheses.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80265-810.1016/S0950-821X(05)80265-8 ↗
2. 10.2106/00004623-197658010-0000710.2106/00004623-197658010-00007 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00008-510.1016/S0966-6362(02)00008-5 ↗
4. Unal R · 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2012 · 1949
5. 10.1016/j.robot.2014.12.01310.1016/j.robot.2014.12.013 ↗
6. 10.1109/MRA.2014.236027810.1109/MRA.2014.2360278 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.01110.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.011 ↗
8. 10.1097/01.phm.0000174665.74933.0b10.1097/01.phm.0000174665.74933.0b ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.03010.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.030 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00421-008-0764-010.1007/s00421-008-0764-0 ↗
11. 10.1177/027836490708458810.1177/0278364907084588 ↗
12. 10.1109/TMECH.2009.203268810.1109/TMECH.2009.2032688 ↗
13. 10.1682/JRRD.2008.09.013110.1682/JRRD.2008.09.0131 ↗
14. Rouse E J · IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics · 2013 · 1
15. 10.1109/ICRA.2016.748719410.1109/ICRA.2016.7487194 ↗
16. 10.1109/LRA.2016.252192610.1109/LRA.2016.2521926 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10514-008-9096-510.1007/s10514-008-9096-5 ↗
18. Winter D A · Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement · 2005
19. 10.1109/MRA.2014.238136810.1109/MRA.2014.2381368 ↗
20. Geeroms J · 5th IEEE RAS & EMBS Int. Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2014 · 101610.1109/BIOROB.2014.6913913 ↗
21. Gudmundsson K H · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2010 · 1910.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035023 ↗