journal article·2011-03-01

Vortex interaction of tandem pitching and plunging plates: a two-dimensional model of hovering dragonfly-like flight

David Rival, Dirk Schönweitz, Cameron Tropea

Bioinspiration & Biomimetics· Volume 6· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The force evolution and associated vortex dynamics on a nominal two-dimensional tandem pitching and plunging configuration inspired by hovering dragonfly-like flight have been investigated experimentally using time-resolved particle image velocimetry. The aerodynamic forces acting on the flat plates have been determined using a classic control-volume approach, i.e. a momentum balance. It was found that only the tandem phasing of ψ = 90° was capable of generating similar levels of thrust when compared to the single-plate reference case. For this tandem configuration, however, a much more constant thrust generation was developed over the cycle. Further examination showed that the force and vortex development on the fore-plate was unaffected by the tandem configuration and that nearly all variations in performance could be attributed to the vortex interaction on the hind-plate. By calculating the trajectory and strength of the hind-plate's trailing-edge vortex, the chain-like vortex interaction mechanism responsible for improved performance at ψ = 90° could be identified. The underlying result from this study suggests that the dominant vortex interaction in dragonfly flight is two dimensional and that the spanwise flow generated by root-flapping kinematics is not entirely necessary for efficient propulsion but potentially due to evolutionary restrictions in nature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems · Fish Ecology and Management Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Alexander D E · J. Exp. Biol. · 1984 · 109 · 37910.1242/jeb.109.1.379 ↗
2. Azuma A · J. Exp. Biol. · 1988 · 137 · 22110.1242/jeb.137.1.221 ↗
3. Bosch H · 1978
4. 10.1242/jeb.0181310.1242/jeb.01813 ↗
5. Ellington C P · 2006
6. 10.2514/1.627410.2514/1.6274 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00348-009-0632-710.1007/s00348-009-0632-7 ↗
8. Kat R Oudheusden B W Scarano F · 2009
9. 10.1007/BF0117854310.1007/BF01178543 ↗
10. 10.1242/jeb.00757510.1242/jeb.007575 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00348-008-0595-010.1007/s00348-008-0595-0 ↗
12. 10.1242/jeb.0131910.1242/jeb.01319 ↗
13. 10.1006/jfls.1997.008110.1006/jfls.1997.0081 ↗
14. 10.1006/jfls.1999.021910.1006/jfls.1999.0219 ↗
15. Raffel M · Particle Image Velocimetry-A Practical Guide · 200710.1007/978-3-540-72308-0 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00348-009-0796-110.1007/s00348-009-0796-1 ↗
17. 10.1242/jeb.0096910.1242/jeb.00969 ↗
18. 10.1242/jeb.0126210.1242/jeb.01262 ↗
19. 10.1006/jfls.1997.011110.1006/jfls.1997.0111 ↗
20. 10.1098/rsif.2008.012410.1098/rsif.2008.0124 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00348-007-0261-y10.1007/s00348-007-0261-y ↗
22. 10.1242/jeb.0185210.1242/jeb.01852 ↗
23. 10.2514/1.1589910.2514/1.15899 ↗