A locust-inspired miniature jumping robot
Source abstract
Abstract
Unmanned ground vehicles are mostly wheeled, tracked, or legged. These locomotion mechanisms have a limited ability to traverse rough terrain and obstacles that are higher than the robot's center of mass. In order to improve the mobility of small robots it is necessary to expand the variety of their motion gaits. Jumping is one of nature's solutions to the challenge of mobility in difficult terrain. The desert locust is the model for the presented bio-inspired design of a jumping mechanism for a small mobile robot. The basic mechanism is similar to that of the semilunar process in the hind legs of the locust, and is based on the cocking of a torsional spring by wrapping a tendon-like wire around the shaft of a miniature motor. In this study we present the jumping mechanism design, and the manufacturing and performance analysis of two demonstrator prototypes. The most advanced jumping robot demonstrator is power autonomous, weighs 23 gr, and is capable of jumping to a height of 3.35 m, covering a distance of 1.37 m.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Locomotion and Control · Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Ackerman E · IEEE Spectrum Robotics Blog · 2012
2. Armour R · Bioinsp. Biomim. · 2007 · 2 · 1710.1088/1748-3182/2/3/S01 ↗
3. Bennet-Clark H · J. Exp. Biol. · 1975 · 63 · 2110.1242/jeb.63.1.53 ↗
4. 10.1109/JMEMS.2011.217441410.1109/JMEMS.2011.2174414 ↗
5. 10.1242/jeb.03467810.1242/jeb.034678 ↗
6. 10.1155/2014/46348910.1155/2014/463489 ↗
7. de Cubber G · 7th Int. Workshop on Robotics for Risky Environments · 2013
8. Desbiens A L · Bioinsp. Biomim. · 2014 · 9 · 1210.1088/1748-3182/9/2/025009 ↗
9. 10.1108/0143991081086856110.1108/01439910810868561 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0069616610.1007/BF00696166 ↗
11. Heitler W · 2007
12. Heitler W · J. Exp. Biol. · 1977 · 66 · 17
13. 10.1109/ROBOT.2000.84410410.1109/ROBOT.2000.844104 ↗
14. 10.1109/ROBIO.2012.649106510.1109/ROBIO.2012.6491065 ↗
15. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00343.x10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00343.x ↗
16. Katz S · J. Exp. Biol. · 1993 · 177 · 3110.1242/jeb.177.1.81 ↗
17. 10.1109/ROBOT.2008.454323610.1109/ROBOT.2008.4543236 ↗
18. 10.1109/ROBIO.2011.618150210.1109/ROBIO.2011.6181502 ↗
19. 10.1109/IROS.2009.535400510.1109/IROS.2009.5354005 ↗
20. 10.1177/027836491140569710.1177/0278364911405697 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60121-210.1016/S1672-6529(11)60121-2 ↗
22. 10.1109/TRO.2012.219851010.1109/TRO.2012.2198510 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0069648810.1007/BF00696488 ↗
24. 10.1109/ROBOT.2007.36383010.1109/ROBOT.2007.363830 ↗
25. 10.5772/693010.5772/6930 ↗
26. 10.1109/TRO.2006.86248310.1109/TRO.2006.862483 ↗
27. 10.1109/IROS.2010.565292810.1109/IROS.2010.5652928 ↗
28. 10.1109/IROS.2010.564898210.1109/IROS.2010.5648982 ↗
29. 10.1109/TRO.2013.224937110.1109/TRO.2013.2249371 ↗
30. 10.1109/ICRA.2014.690760910.1109/ICRA.2014.6907609 ↗