journal article·2015-05-13Open access

A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery

T Ranzani, G Gerboni, M Cianchetti, A Menciassi

Bioinspiration & Biomimetics· Volume 10· Issue 3

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel, bioinspired manipulator for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The manipulator is entirely composed of soft materials, and it has been designed to provide similar motion capabilities as the octopus's arm in order to reach the surgical target while exploiting its whole length to actively interact with the biological structures. The manipulator is composed of two identical modules (each of them can be controlled independently) with multi-directional bending and stiffening capabilities, like an octopus arm. In the authors' previous works, the design of the single module has been addressed. Here a two-module manipulator is presented, with the final aim of demonstrating the enhanced capabilities that such a structure can have in comparison with rigid surgical tools currently employed in MIS. The performances in terms of workspace, stiffening capabilities, and generated forces are characterized through experimental tests. The combination of stiffening capabilities and manipulation tasks is also addressed to confirm the manipulator potential employment in a real surgical scenario.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Micro and Nano Robotics · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Smith K K · Am. Sci. · 1989 · 77 · 28
2. 10.1080/1176232080255786510.1080/11762320802557865 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002 ↗
4. 10.1117/12.60620110.1117/12.606201 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20120300210.1002/adma.201203002 ↗
6. Cheng N G · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2012 · 4328
7. 10.1163/156855312X62634310.1163/156855312X626343 ↗
8. 10.1089/soro.2014.000110.1089/soro.2014.0001 ↗
9. 10.1007/bfb003520710.1007/bfb0035207 ↗
10. 10.1109/TBME.2002.100197610.1109/TBME.2002.1001976 ↗
11. 10.1109/RBME.2012.223631110.1109/RBME.2012.2236311 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09886.x10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09886.x ↗
13. 10.1017/S026357471400097610.1017/S0263574714000976 ↗
14. Degani A · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob Autom. · 2006 · 4167
15. Wei W · Proc. IEEE/RAS-EMBS Int Conf. Biomedical Rob. Biomechatr. · 2006 · 76910.1109/BIOROB.2006.1639183 ↗
16. Bajo A · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2013 · 232
17. 10.1109/TBME.2013.226086010.1109/TBME.2013.2260860 ↗
18. Bajo A · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2012 · 3381
19. Shang J · Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2011 · 2011 · 114710.1109/ICRA.2011.5980261 ↗
20. 10.1109/TRO.2014.230983510.1109/TRO.2014.2309835 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.00910.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.009 ↗
22. 10.1109/MPUL.2010.93917610.1109/MPUL.2010.939176 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)01298-810.1016/S0016-5107(05)01298-8 ↗
24. 10.1055/s-2006-94501410.1055/s-2006-945014 ↗
25. 10.1109/TRO.2013.225631310.1109/TRO.2013.2256313 ↗
26. Kim Y J · IEEE Trans. Rob. · 2013 · 30 · 1
27. Moses M S · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation · 2013 · 4008
28. Cianchetti M · Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2013 · 3576
29. Dhumane P W · J. Min. Access Surg. · 2011 · 7 · 4010.4103/0972-9941.72381 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.gii.2013.09.00710.1016/j.gii.2013.09.007 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.100325010710.1073/pnas.1003250107 ↗
32. Steltz E · SPIE · 2010 · 7642
33. Jiang A · IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. · 2012 · 2922
34. Li M · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2014 · 23
35. 10.1007/978-3-662-01566-7_110.1007/978-3-662-01566-7_1 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00464008000910.1007/s004640080009 ↗