journal article·2026-09-01Open access

Precision bioprinting-based extrusion of tumour spheroids on pre-matured in vitro tissue models on demand

Marieke Kramer, Klaudija Janic, Rasika Murkar, Angelina Weddig, Jörg Vierhaus, Julian Thiele, Sascha Kopp

Biofabrication· Volume 18· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Tissue-engineered tumour models utilizing organ-specific three-dimensional (3D) tumour spheroids are crucial for developing and validating novel imaging systems targeted to their detection. This study explores the use of 3D bioprinting to develop and standardize the precise placement of tumour spheroids on prefabricated tissue models. These models can be used as a validation platform for novel biomedical diagnostic devices. Such integrated systems enable rapid, minimally invasive detection and characterization of cancer cells, reducing reliance on traditional biopsy-based methods. The standardized deposition of spheroids onto prefabricated tissue models required 1. The development of a spring-loaded bracket to keep tissue samples in a defined position during 3D printing; 2. A custom-made, Python-based graphical user interface to facilitate the determination of spheroid printing positions within a standard 12-well cell culture plate. The program digitally reproduces the plate layout within a Cartesian coordinate system centred at the plate ’ s geometric midpoint, ensuring compatibility with standard 3D bioprinter coordinate systems; 3. A standardized workflow to define the time-point of extrusion of spheroids and placement onto tissue, which is predetermined accurately by suspending the spheroids in density-matched methylcellulose solution. The accurate placement of individual tumour spheroids (∼500 µ m) onto prefabricated tissue models was validated using a custom-made positioning analysis plate, yielding results of translational offset at x =21.50 µ m and y = 18.63 µ m. This work utilizes simple-to-follow and readily available lab instruments and customized 3D bioprinters, rather than acquiring specialized equipment. Future studies will focus on shortening the workflow presented here and assessing its adaptability to other particle-based tissue models, e.g. microgels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cancer Cells and Metastasis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Universitätsplatz 2

Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Forschungscampus STIMULATE

Funding

European Regional Development Fund as part of the “Saxony-Anhalt SCIENCE Priorities” initiative

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the medical field: a review10.1155/2022/5164970 ↗
2. Recent advances in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial head and neck cancer10.1093/jjco/hyaf045 ↗
3. A critical evaluation of in vitro cell culture models for high-throughput drug screening and toxicity10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.01.001 ↗
4. Novel emerging cell and organoid systems for the study of drug metabolism and toxicity in humans10.1016/j.dmd.2025.100188 ↗
5. Three-dimensional in vitro cell cultures as a feasible and promising alternative to two-dimensional and animal models in cancer research10.7150/ijbs.96469 ↗
6. Three-dimensional cell cultures: the bridge between in vitro and in vivo models10.3390/ijms241512046 ↗
7. In vitro functional models for human liver diseases and drug screening: beyond animal testing10.1039/D1BM01872H ↗
8. Preclinical target validation using patient-derived cells10.1038/nrd4565 ↗
9. Target-based drug discovery: is something wrong?10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03316-1 ↗
10. Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells10.1038/nmeth1015 ↗
11. Oxidized cellulose nanofibril hydrogel as a 3D scaffold for breast tumor spheroid expansion and microenvironment modeling10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.149716 ↗
12. Precision spatial control of tumor‐stroma interactions in cancer models via 3D bioprinting for advanced research and therapy10.1002/adfm.202503391 ↗
13. From 2D to 3D co-culture systems: a review of co-culture models to study the neural cells interaction10.3390/ijms232113116 ↗
14. Comparison of cancer cells in 2D vs 3D culture reveals differences in AKT-mTOR-S6K signaling and drug responses10.1242/jcs.188102 ↗
15. Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations10.1038/s41598-023-45144-w ↗
16. The relevance of using 3D cell cultures, in addition to 2D monolayer cultures, when evaluating breast cancer drug sensitivity and resistance10.18632/oncotarget.9935 ↗
17. Metabolic flux analysis of 3D spheroids reveals significant differences in glucose metabolism from matched 2D cultures of colorectal cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines10.1186/s40170-022-00285-w ↗
18. Two-dimensional and spheroid-based three-dimensional cell culture systems: implications for drug discovery in cancer10.3390/ddc3020024 ↗
19. Three-dimensional spheroids as in vitro preclinical models for cancer research10.3390/pharmaceutics12121186 ↗
20. Breast cancer spheroids reveal a differential cancer stem cell response to chemotherapeutic treatment10.1038/s41598-017-10863-4 ↗
21. spheroid culture differentially affects cancer cell sensitivity to drugs in melanoma and rcc models10.3390/ijms23031166 ↗
22. Comparison of radiation response between 2D and 3D cell culture models of different human cancer cell lines10.3390/cells12030360 ↗
23. Exploring mechanical features of 3D head and neck cancer models10.3390/jfb16030074 ↗
24. Three-dimensional in vitro culture models in oncology research10.1186/s13578-022-00887-3 ↗
25. Reproducibility in systems biology modelling10.15252/msb.20209982 ↗
26. Three-tier framework for high-throughput biofabrication: integrating 3D bioprinting, assistive platforms, and translational opportunities10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.024 ↗
27. A review of advances in 3D and 4D bioprinting: toward mass individualization paradigm10.1007/s10845-024-02529-6 ↗
28. 3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.011 ↗
29. Applications of 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine10.3390/jcm10214966 ↗
30. Advancements in tissue and organ 3D bioprinting: current techniques, applications, and future perspectives10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112853 ↗
31. Large scale production and controlled deposition of single HUVEC spheroids for bioprinting applications10.1088/1758-5090/aa7218 ↗
32. Modular micro-physiological human tumor/tissue models based on decellularized tissue for improved preclinical testing10.14573/altex.2008141 ↗
33. Developing human upper, lower, and deep lung airway models: combining different scaffolds and developing complex co-cultures10.1177/20417314241299076 ↗
34. Mimicking metastases including tumor stroma: a new technique to generate a three-dimensional colorectal cancer model based on a biological decellularized intestinal scaffold10.1089/ten.TEC.2015.0557 ↗
35. Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks10.1002/adhm.201601451 ↗
36. Optimizing nozzle design in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting to minimize mechanical stress and enhance cell viability10.36922/IJB025190182 ↗
37. Controlling shear stress in 3d bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity10.1002/adhm.201500677 ↗
38. Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: focus on tumor spheroid model10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.03.013 ↗
39. Evaluation of spheroid head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell models in comparison to monolayer cultures10.3892/ol.2015.3487 ↗
40. 3D tumor spheroid models for in vitro therapeutic screening: a systematic approach to enhance the biological relevance of data obtained10.1038/srep19103 ↗
41. Morphological response in cancer spheroids for screening photodynamic therapy parameters10.3389/fmolb.2021.784962 ↗
42. Actin self-assembly: from filament structure and mechanics to motile and morphogenetic processes10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.01.001 ↗
43. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement10.1126/science.1175862 ↗
44. Methylcellulose—a versatile printing material that enables biofabrication of tissue equivalents with high shape fidelity10.1039/d0bm00027b ↗
45. 3D printing of methylcellulose-based hydrogels10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00024 ↗
46. 3D bioprinting of methylcellulose/gelatin-methacryloyl (MC/GelMA) bioink with high shape integrity10.1021/acsabm.0c00169 ↗
47. Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.023 ↗
48. Thermo-responsive properties of methylcellulose hydrogels for cell sheet engineering10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.023 ↗
49. 3D printing of thermo-responsive methylcellulose hydrogels for cell-sheet engineering10.3390/ma11040579 ↗
50. Cellulose-based 3D printing bio-inks for biomedical applications: a review10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141174 ↗
51. Mathematical model for characterization of temperature-responsive polymers: a study on the rheological behavior of gelatin and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108402 ↗
52. Thermo-sensitive hydrogels for delivering biotherapeutic molecules: a review10.1016/j.jsps.2019.08.001 ↗
53. Relationship between shear-thinning rheological properties of bioinks and bioprinting parameters10.18063/ijb.687 ↗
54. Assessing variations in manual pipetting: an under-investigated requirement of good laboratory practice10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.09.001 ↗
55. Reducing sources of variance in experimental procedures in in vitro research10.12688/f1000research.73497.2 ↗
56. Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies?10.1371/journal.pbio.3001564 ↗
57. Aspiration-assisted bioprinting for precise positioning of biologics10.1126/sciadv.aaw5111 ↗
58. High‐precision 3D bio‐dot printing to improve paracrine interaction between multiple types of cell spheroids10.1002/adfm.202005324 ↗
59. A method for reproducible high-resolution imaging of 3D cancer cell spheroids10.1111/jmi.13169 ↗
60. A novel standardized inflammatory cell-modulated 3d tumor tissue model for analysis of tumor-stroma interaction and drug discovery10.11648/j.bio.20210904.13 ↗
61. Recapitulating the angiogenic switch in a hydrogel-based 3D in vitro tumor-stroma model10.3390/bioengineering8110186 ↗
62. Biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds for stimulating fibrotic responses: development of an in-vitro assay for implant material testing10.3389/fbioe.2025.1628630 ↗
63. Hybrid collagen alginate hydrogel as a platform for 3D tumor spheroid invasion10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.003 ↗
64. In vitro chemotaxis and tissue remodeling assays quantitatively characterize foreign body reaction10.14573/altex.1610071 ↗