Resolving the multiscale design trade-off in bone tissue engineering: from generative design to digital twins
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The clinical translation of bone tissue engineering is constrained by a severe multiscale design trade-off: the requirement for load-bearing mechanical strength competes directly with the need for vascular-permissive porosity. Conventional approaches address scaffold geometry, material formulation, and fabrication in a sequential, decoupled manner and therefore fail to navigate this multi-objective conflict. To overcome this limitation, we propose an ‘AI-Driven Holistic Intelligence’ framework. It spans the entire pipeline from generative inverse design to digital twin (DT)-based predictive maturation. The framework integrates gradient scaffold optimization, closed-loop adaptive manufacturing, and virtual clinical trial within a unified workflow. This architecture is designed to co-optimize the boundary conditions of stiffness and perfusion simultaneously, rather than in isolation. Nonetheless, realizing this vision as a clinically viable autonomous regeneration pathway will require bridging persistent translational gaps in data standardization, algorithm interpretability, and regulatory alignment. Importantly, the core innovation of this framework is not merely to navigate the empirical ‘trade-off’ along a fixed Pareto front, but to resolve it through multiscale co-optimization that expands the accessible design space, enabling simultaneous improvements in mechanical strength and vascular perfusion beyond the limits achievable by conventional single-objective approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (95)
Show source-provided references
1. Design and 3D printing of personalized hybrid and gradient structures for critical size bone defects10.1021/acsabm.3c00107 ↗
2. Biomimetic structural design in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101664 ↗
3. A Review of 3D Printed Bone Implants10.3390/mi13040528 ↗
4. Beyond hype: unveiling the Real challenges in clinical translation of 3D printed bone scaffolds and the fresh prospects of bioprinted organoids10.1186/s12951-024-02759-z ↗
5. Risk factors and outcomes for failure of biological reconstruction after resection of primary malignant bone tumors in the extremities10.1038/s41598-021-00092-1 ↗
6. What are the long-term results of MUTARS® modular endoprostheses for reconstruction of tumor resection of the distal femur and proximal Tibia?10.1007/s11999-015-4644-8 ↗
7. Surgical management of periprosthetic joint infections in hip and knee megaprostheses10.3390/medicina60040583 ↗
8. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
9. Exploring macroporosity of additively manufactured titanium metamaterials for bone regeneration with quality by design: a systematic literature review10.3390/ma13214794 ↗
10. Parallel generation of extensive vascular networks with application to an archetypal human kidney model10.1098/rsos.210973 ↗
11. Modeling vascular dynamics at the initial stage of endochondral ossification on a microfluidic chip using a human embryonic-stem-cell-derived organoid10.1016/j.reth.2024.11.018 ↗
12. 3D printing of Haversian bone–mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725 ↗
13. Unleashing the power of artificial intelligence in materials design10.3390/ma16175927 ↗
14. Recent advances in artificial intelligent strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine10.1111/srt.70016 ↗
15. Bioinspired sandwich-structured PLA scaffolds via additive manufacturing: optimizing mechanical properties and printing efficiency for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.114304 ↗
16. Hybrid 3D bioprinting of sustainable biomaterials for advanced multiscale tissue engineering10.1002/smll.202408947 ↗
17. Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to revolutionize vascular surgery: a comprehensive review of current applications, prospects, and potential Challenges10.51891/rease.v10i8.15186 ↗
18. Recent advances and applications of artificial intelligence in 3D bioprinting10.1063/5.0190208 ↗
19. AI energized hydrogel design, optimization and application in biomedicine10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101014 ↗
20. 3D bioprinting and artificial intelligence for tumor microenvironment modeling: a scoping review of models, methods, and integration pathways10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c01062 ↗
21. Machine learning-enabled constrained multi-objective design of architected materials10.1038/s41467-023-42415-y ↗
22. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707 ↗
23. Rapid fabrication of complex 3D extracellular microenvironments by dynamic optical projection stereolithography10.1002/adma.201202024 ↗
24. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
25. Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels10.1126/science.aav9750 ↗
26. Nature’s hierarchical materials10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.06.001 ↗
27. Simulation of corrosion and mechanical degradation of additively manufactured Mg scaffolds in simulated body fluid10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104881 ↗
28. Porous geometry guided micro-mechanical environment within scaffolds for cell mechanobiology study in bone tissue engineering10.3389/fbioe.2021.736489 ↗
29. Digital twins for tissue culture techniques—concepts, expectations, and state of the art10.3390/pr9030447 ↗
30. A machine learning-based multiscale model to predict bone formation in scaffolds10.1038/s43588-021-00115-x ↗
31. Closed-loop control of direct ink writing via reinforcement learning10.1145/3528223.3530144 ↗
32. Monitoring and control of biological additive manufacturing using machine learning10.1007/s10845-023-02092-6 ↗
33. Addressing uncertainty in biodesign through digital twins: a case of biofabrication with mycelium10.1145/3685271 ↗
34. Co-optimization of design and fabrication plans for carpentry10.1145/3508499 ↗
35. Computational discovery of microstructured composites with optimal stiffness-toughness trade-offs10.1126/sciadv.adk4284 ↗
36. Machine learning and 3D bioprinting10.18063/ijb.717 ↗
37. AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: from bench to bedside10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.021 ↗
38. Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics10.1038/ncomms1792 ↗
39. The design of reversible hydrogels to capture extracellular matrix dynamics10.1038/natrevmats.2015.12 ↗
40. Automatic landmarking as a convenient prerequisite for geometric morphometrics. Validation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- based shape analysis of the nasal complex10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110095 ↗
41. in vitro bone metastasis dwelling in a 3D bioengineered niche10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120624 ↗
42. deep learning for size‐agnostic inverse design of random‐network 3D printed mechanical metamaterials10.1002/adma.202303481 ↗
43. Quantitative CT‐based methods for bone microstructural measures and their relationships with vertebral fractures in a pilot study on smokers10.1002/jbm4.10484 ↗
44. Automatic landmark detection and mapping for 2D/3D registration with BoneNet10.3389/fvets.2022.923449 ↗
45. Segmentation of cortical bone,trabecular bone, and medullary pores from micro‐ CT images using 2D and 3D deep learning models10.1002/ar.25633 ↗
46. Reinforcement learning inclusion to alter design sequence of finite element modeling10.1007/s41939-024-00493-5 ↗
47. Biomaterial scaffold stiffness influences the foreign body reaction, tissue stiffness, angiogenesis and neuroregeneration in spinal cord injury10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.12.006 ↗
48. Bone‐GAN: generation of virtual bone microstructure of high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography10.1002/mp.16482 ↗
49. Adaptive constrained constructive optimisation for complex vascularisation processes10.1038/s41598-021-85434-9 ↗
50. π learning: a performance‐informed framework for microstructural electrode design10.1002/aenm.202300244 ↗
51. Advancing scaffold porosity through a machine learning framework in extrusion based 3D bioprinting10.3389/fmats.2023.1337485 ↗
52. On responsible machine learning datasets emphasizing fairness, privacy and regulatory norms with examples in biometrics and healthcare10.1038/s42256-024-00874-y ↗
53. Bioink formulation and machine learning-empowered bioprinting optimization10.3389/fbioe.2022.913579 ↗
54. Constraint based Bayesian optimization of bioink precursor: a machine learning framework10.1088/1758-5090/ad716e ↗
55. Digital rheometer twins: learning the hidden rheology of complex fluids through rheology-informed graph neural networks10.1073/pnas.2202234119 ↗
56. Scientific machine learning for modeling and simulating complex fluids10.1073/pnas.2304669120 ↗
57. Cell viability prediction and optimization in extrusion-based bioprinting via neural network-based Bayesian optimization models10.1088/1758-5090/ad17cf ↗
58. Characterization and machine learning-driven property prediction of a novel hybrid hydrogel bioink considering extrusion-based 3D bioprinting10.3390/gels11010045 ↗
59. Study of antibacterial and mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐acrylic acid)/hydroxyapatite biocomposite by using artificial neural network approach10.1002/pls2.10117 ↗
60. 4D printing polymeric biomaterials for adaptive tissue regeneration10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.01.033 ↗
61. 3D/4D printed bio-piezoelectric smart scaffolds for next-generation bone tissue engineering10.1088/2631-7990/acd88f ↗
62. Moderate‐affinity affibodies modulate the delivery and bioactivity of bone morphogenetic Protein‐210.1002/adhm.202300793 ↗
63. Self-healing, 3D printed bioinks from self-assembled peptide and alginate hybrid hydrogels10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214145 ↗
64. 3D printed deformable sensors10.1126/sciadv.aba5575 ↗
65. SMART (self- monitoring analysis and reporting technology) and sensor based technology applications in trauma and orthopaedic surgery10.1016/j.jor.2023.09.006 ↗
66. Printability and cell viability in extrusion-based bioprinting from experimental, computational, and machine learning views10.3390/jfb13020040 ↗
67. Minimally invasive bioprinting for in situ liver regeneration10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.011 ↗
68. A deep learning-based model for defect detection in laser-powder bed fusion using in-situ thermographic monitoring10.1007/s40964-019-00108-3 ↗
69. Numerical analysis of fault detection in additive manufacturing based on sustainable automation techniques10.1007/s00170-023-12624-2 ↗
70. Monitoring anomalies in 3D bioprinting with deep neural networks10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01761 ↗
71. Investigation of hydrogel and gelatin bath formulations for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting using deep learning10.1016/j.procir.2022.06.064 ↗
72. Strategies for multi-case physics-informed neural networks for tube flows: a study using 2D flow scenarios10.1038/s41598-024-62117-9 ↗
73. FEM-GAN: a physics-supervised deep learning generative model for elastic porous materials10.3390/ma16134740 ↗
74. Cooperative task execution for object detection in edge computing: an internet of things application10.3390/app13084982 ↗
75. Object detection using deep learning, cnns and vision transformers: a review10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3266093 ↗
76. Detection and characterization of defects in additive manufacturing by polarization-based imaging system10.1186/s10033-023-00943-0 ↗
77. An integrated fuzzy logic and machine learning platform for porosity detection using optical tomography imaging during laser powder bed fusion10.1088/2631-7990/ad65cd ↗
78. Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration10.1088/2631-7990/ad878c ↗
79. Raman spectroscopy and machine learning enables estimation of articular cartilage structural, compositional, and functional properties10.1007/s10439-023-03271-5 ↗
80. Progress of microneedle electrochemical biosensors for interstitial fluid detection and monitoring10.1002/cjoc.70158 ↗
81. Towards generative digital twins in biomedical research10.1016/j.csbj.2024.09.030 ↗
82. Deep reinforcement learning extracts the optimal sepsis treatment policy from treatment records10.1038/s43856-024-00665-x ↗
83. Reinforcement Learning and PK‐PD models integration to personalize the adaptive dosing protocol of erdafitinib in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma10.1002/cpt.3176 ↗
84. Reinforcement learning informs optimal treatment strategies to limit antibiotic resistance10.1073/pnas.2303165121 ↗
85. Structural optimization of 3D-printed patient-specific ceramic scaffolds for in vivo bone regeneration in load-bearing defects10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104613 ↗
86. Credibility assessment of patient-specific computational modeling using patient-specific cardiac modeling as an exemplar10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010541 ↗
87. Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics10.1073/pnas.2101784118 ↗
88. Conceptualizing the digital thread for smart manufacturing: a systematic literature review10.1007/s10845-024-02407-1 ↗
89. Active learning and bayesian optimization: a unified perspective to learn with a goal10.1007/s11831-024-10064-z ↗
90. Application of machine learning in 3D bioprinting: focus on development of big data and digital twin10.18063/ijb.v7i1.342 ↗
91. On the reproducibility of extrusion-based bioprinting: round robin study on standardization in the field10.1088/1758-5090/acfe3b ↗
92. Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1 ↗
93. Stronger regulation of AI in biomedicine10.1126/scitranslmed.adi0336 ↗
94. Clinical AI tools must convey predictive uncertainty for each individual patient10.1038/s41591-023-02562-7 ↗
95. A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction10.1038/s41596-019-0271-2 ↗