journal article·2020-12

Damage sensing in multi-functional glass fiber composites under mode-I fracture loading

Jacob O’Donnell, Vijaya Chalivendra, Asha Hall, Yong Kim

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 54· Issue 30
Publisher page

Abstract

A detailed experimental study is performed for piezo resistance damage sensing on conductive glass fiber/epoxy composites under mode-I fracture conditions. The conductive composites are fabricated by homogeneously dispersing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) within the epoxy matrix and electro-flocking short carbon fibers onto the laminates along with a vacuum infusion process. A parametric study is done on the in-situ damage sensing properties by varying the carbon fiber lengths (150 µm and 350 µm) and the carbon fiber areal densities (500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 fibers/mm 2 ). The change in resistance is captured with a four-point probe measuring methodology by measuring the resistance through the thickness of the composite. The crack initiation toughness value of the composites containing carbon fibers showed improvement over control composites. Composites containing 350 µm length carbon fibers and 2000 fiber/mm 2 not only showed the best crack initiation toughness but also provided sensitive network for detecting crack growth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Icing and De-icing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, USA

U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, USA

Department of Bioengineering, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, USA

Funding

Army Reearch Laboratory · National Science Foundation

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/073168441453079010.1177/0731684414530790 ↗
2. 10.1177/09636935000090030610.1177/096369350000900306 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.08.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.08.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.039 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.031 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.06.03710.1016/j.compositesa.2004.06.037 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.011 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.02210.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.022 ↗
9. 10.1515/secm-2013-028410.1515/secm-2013-0284 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.07710.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.077 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2493510.1002/pc.24935 ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-665X/aae7f210.1088/1361-665X/aae7f2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.05.01010.1016/j.coco.2019.05.010 ↗
14. 10.1177/073168441983279610.1177/0731684419832796 ↗
15. 10.1080/14658011.2019.171134510.1080/14658011.2019.1711345 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.025 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.034 ↗