journal article·2010-04

Thermal Conductivity of Carbon-filled Polypropylene-based Resins

Julia A. King, Daniel Lopez Gaxiola, Beth A. Johnson, Jason M. Keith

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 44· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Varying amounts of three different carbons (carbon black, synthetic graphite particles, and carbon nanotubes) were added to polypropylene, and the resulting single-filler composites were tested for thermal conductivity using the nanoflash test method. In addition, the effects of single fillers and combinations of different carbon fillers were studied via a factorial design. Each single filler caused a statistically significant increase in through-plane thermal conductivity at the 95% confidence level, with synthetic graphite causing the largest increase, followed by carbon nanotubes, and then carbon black. The synthetic graphite/carbon nanotube formulations, followed by the carbon black/synthetic graphite formulations also caused a statistically significant increase in composite through-plane thermal conductivity. Composites containing 75 and 80 wt% synthetic graphite in polypropylene had an in-plane thermal conductivity of 24 and 34 W/m·K, respectively. This meets the thermal conductivity target of >20 W/m·K for fuel cell bipolar plates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Thermal properties of materials · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI 49931-1295, USA,

Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI 49931-1295, USA

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Finan, J.M.
2. 10.1002/app.1985.07030053410.1002/app.1985.070300534 ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.76017120610.1002/pen.760171206 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.75007030210.1002/pc.750070302 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.75006010510.1002/pc.750060105 ↗
6. 10.1163/156855499X0016110.1163/156855499X00161 ↗
7. Demain, A. · 1994
8. 10.1002/pc.1052610.1002/pc.10526 ↗
9. Murthy, M.V.
10. Simon, R.M. · Polymer News · 1985 · 11 · 102
11. Mapleston, P. · Modern Plastics · 1992 · 69 · 80
12. Donnet, J.-B. · 1993
13. 10.1002/adv.1002510.1002/adv.10025 ↗
14. 10.1002/pen.76019161010.1002/pen.760191610 ↗
15. Wilson, M.S. · Patent Number · 2001 · 6 · 467
16. Loutfy, R.O. · Patent Number · 2003 · 6 · 766
17. Braun, J.C. · Patent Number · 2001 · 6 · 275
18. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00542-610.1016/S0378-7753(02)00542-6 ↗
19. 10.1002/pen.2017710.1002/pen.20177 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.074 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.18210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.182 ↗
22. Robberg, K. · Fuel Cell Technology and Applications · 2003 · 3 · 308
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.01610.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.016 ↗
24. Wang, Y. · 2006
25. The Dow Chemical Company Polypropylene resin Produce Literature, Form 167-00162-0905X, Midland, MI, 48674 (2005).
26. S. Riverside Plaza · 1999 · 60606
27. 10.1002/app.2391410.1002/app.23914 ↗
28. Asbury Carbons Product Information, Asbury, NJ, 08802 ( 2004).
29. Conoco Inc. · 1999 · 77252
30. Hyperion Catalysis International · 2008 · 38 · 02138
31. Standard Test Method for Thermal Diffusivity by the Flash Method, ASTM Standard E1461-07, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, (2008).
32. 10.1063/1.172841710.1063/1.1728417 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.172956410.1063/1.1729564 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.32163510.1063/1.321635 ↗
35. Koski, J.A. · Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Thermophysical Properties · 1981
36. 10.1002/app.1353210.1002/app.13532 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2001410.1002/pc.20014 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2044610.1002/pc.20446 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.2942210.1002/app.29422 ↗
40. 10.1002/app.2245210.1002/app.22452 ↗
41. Weber, E.H. · I. Synergistic Effects of Carbon Fillers, Journal of Applied Polymer Science · 2003 · 88 · 112
42. Montgomery, D.C. · 2001