journal article·2024-11

Experimental investigation of eco-friendly fiber-reinforced concrete using recycled and natural fibers, integrated with recycled aggregates

Amir Mahboob, Omid Hassanshahi, Mohammad Safi, Taksiah A. Majid

Advanced Composite Materials· Volume 33· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigates the integration of recycled and natural fibers with recycled concrete aggregates to develop environmentally friendly fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC), with a primary aim of maintaining or enhancing its properties. Four concrete mixtures, namely plain concrete (C-Plain), recycled steel fiber-reinforced concrete (C-RSF), recycled plastic fiber-reinforced concrete (C-RPF), and kenaf fiber-reinforced concrete (C-KF), were formulated and analyzed for their fresh, hardened, and durability characteristics. A 50% replacement of natural coarse aggregates’ weight with recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) was implemented. By standardizing fiber volume fractions at 1.0% for all FRC mixtures, the study evaluated properties such as workability, dry density, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, post-cracking flexural performance, modulus of rupture, flexural toughness, splitting tensile strength, and freeze-thaw resistance after 100 and 300 cycles. Testing involved three specimens for each parameter at 7 and 28 days. The results indicated positive effects on post-cracking flexural performance, modulus of rupture, flexural toughness, splitting tensile strength, and durability with the incorporation of recycled and natural fibers. Notably, C-RSF demonstrated the highest compressive strength (46.63 MPa), flexural toughness (64.35 kN-mm), and modulus of rupture (7.46 MPa) compared to other FRC composites. Additionally, it exhibited minimal weight loss (2.18% and 3.07%) after freeze-thaw cycles, indicating exceptional durability. C-RSF exhibited superior performance, while C-KF showed enhancement slightly below that of C-RSF. Although not reaching the level of C-RSF, C-RPF positively influenced concrete performance. Compressive response either maintained performance or exhibited marginal reduction. The findings carry significant implications for developing environmentally conscious construction materials with enhanced mechanical and durability properties, thereby advancing sustainable construction practices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Strength of Materials and Structural Engineering Department, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, C/Colom 11, TR45, 08222 Terrassa, Spain

Department of Civil engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

References (87)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1163/15685510778232523010.1163/156855107782325230 ↗
2. 10.1080/09243046.2023.218079210.1080/09243046.2023.2180792 ↗
3. 10.1080/09243046.2014.98684410.1080/09243046.2014.986844 ↗
4. 10.1080/09243046.2023.224521010.1080/09243046.2023.2245210 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20190415910.1002/aenm.201904159 ↗
6. 10.1080/10643389.2015.107706710.1080/10643389.2015.1077067 ↗
7. 10.1590/1679-7825538710.1590/1679-78255387 ↗
8. 10.1163/092430410X50413410.1163/092430410X504134 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.01610.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016 ↗
10. 10.1002/suco.20200051210.1002/suco.202000512 ↗
11. 10.1002/suco.20170019810.1002/suco.201700198 ↗
12. En BS. 1-1. Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures–part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2004.
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11229210.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112292 ↗
14. 10.21926/rpm.230201610.21926/rpm.2302016 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.500575510.1063/1.5005755 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40999-023-00881-x10.1007/s40999-023-00881-x ↗
17. 10.1007/s40999-022-00701-810.1007/s40999-022-00701-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11723210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117232 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.16010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.160 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11527-005-9009-410.1007/s11527-005-9009-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.01510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.015 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11591210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115912 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1402025610.3390/ma14020256 ↗
24. Maxineasa SG, Neocleous K, Dumitrescu L. Environmental LCA of innovative reuse of all End-of-life tyre components in concrete. 1st International Conference on Construction Materials for Sustainable Future, Zadar, Croatia. 2017. http://www.grad.hr/coms/ocs/index.php/coms/coms2017
25. Yousefi A, Bunnori NM, Khavarian M, et al. 2017, October. Experimental investigation on effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes concentration on flexural properties and microstructure of cement mortar composite. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Penang, Malaysia. (Vol. 1892, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
26. Outlook T. Seamless transport for greener growth. Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development. 2012;20:2015.
27. 10.1007/s40999-022-00774-510.1007/s40999-022-00774-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.00510.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.005 ↗
29. 10.1590/1679-7825540710.1590/1679-78255407 ↗
30. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102676-2.00018-910.1016/B978-0-08-102676-2.00018-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.05610.1016/j.cej.2014.11.056 ↗
32. 10.1039/C6GC02153K10.1039/C6GC02153K ↗
33. 10.1016/j.pecs.2021.10092910.1016/j.pecs.2021.100929 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13161710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131617 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10127110.1016/j.rineng.2023.101271 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.05610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.056 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.24510.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.245 ↗
38. 10.1007/s13369-022-06977-110.1007/s13369-022-06977-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10583310.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105833 ↗
40. 10.1007/s40999-023-00865-x10.1007/s40999-023-00865-x ↗
41. 10.3390/su15221576010.3390/su152215760 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13216610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132166 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1505130910.3390/polym15051309 ↗
44. Creighton C. 7.1. 1 market trends. BioProducts: Green Materials For An Emerging Circular And Sustainable Economy. 2023;87.
45. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
46. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351:AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351:AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
47. Astm A. ‘Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate’. PA: ASTM West Conshohocken; 2015.
48. Astm A. ‘C29 standard test method for bulk density (“unit weight”) and voids in aggregate’. Pennsylvania, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book; 2009.
49. ASTM C. ‘131. Standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles Machine’. Conshohoken, PA: ASTM; 2006.
50. ASTM C. ‘Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates’. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM C136-06; 2006.
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13109310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131093 ↗
52. 10.3390/asi502004110.3390/asi5020041 ↗
53. Dixon DE, et al. ‘Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete (ACI 211.1-91)’. Farmington Hills: ACI; 1991.
54. 10.1007/BF0248053810.1007/BF02480538 ↗
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000074210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000742 ↗
56. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000123710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001237 ↗
57. 10.1617/s11527-006-9161-510.1617/s11527-006-9161-5 ↗
58. 10.3390/ma1510369310.3390/ma15103693 ↗
59. 10.1680/macr.2008.62.2.10310.1680/macr.2008.62.2.103 ↗
60. Astm C. ‘597, standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete’. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2009.
61. En BS. 12390-13. Testing hardened concrete–part 13: determination of secant modulus of elasticity in compression. London, UK: British Standards Institution; 2013.
62. Taerwe L, Matthys S. Fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Sohn, Wiley; 2013.
63. A. I. C. C. on C. and C. Aggregates. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete Specimens1. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM international; 2017.
64. 10.1617/s11527-011-9709-x10.1617/s11527-011-9709-x ↗
65. Standard A. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM Annual Book Of ASTM Standards; 2015.
66. El-Korchi T, Simon M, Forster S. 5 Assessing freezing and thawing resistance of concrete using the modified AASHTO T161 (ASTM C666) PROCEDURE. Concrete Under Sev Cond Environ Load. 1995;1:65.
67. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.24510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.245 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12384210.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123842 ↗
69. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000147210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001472 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.004 ↗
71. 10.1680/macr.1985.37.130.2910.1680/macr.1985.37.130.29 ↗
72. 10.1617/s11527-008-9361-210.1617/s11527-008-9361-2 ↗
73. 10.3390/fib809005610.3390/fib8090056 ↗
74. 10.3390/polym1423513810.3390/polym14235138 ↗
75. 10.1177/1558925021104018410.1177/15589250211040184 ↗
76. 10.5755/j01.ms.22.4.1324610.5755/j01.ms.22.4.13246 ↗
77. 10.3390/ma1422708710.3390/ma14227087 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.sftr.2022.10009410.1016/j.sftr.2022.100094 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.02.01410.1016/j.jobe.2018.02.014 ↗
80. 10.32604/jrm.2022.01751310.32604/jrm.2022.017513 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.01510.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.015 ↗
82. Ahmad S, Raza A, Gupta H, ‘Mechanical properties of bamboo fibre reinforced concrete’, in 2nd international conference on research in science, engineering and technology, Dubai, 2014, p. 22.
83. 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10120510.1016/j.rineng.2023.101205 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.13410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.134 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12428410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124284 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.18310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.183 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.006 ↗