journal article·1995-05

Fracture Mechanics Analysis of the Fibre Fragmentation Test

Limin Zhou, Jang-Kyo Kim, Caroline Baillie, Yiu-Wing Mai

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 29· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

An improved micromechanics analysis is developed for the stress transfer in the single fibre fragmentation test. Considering the partially debonded interface as the most general case, Griffith's fracture mechanics approach is employed to derive a debond criterion at the fibre-matrix interface. An average fibre strength model from the Weibull statistics is used to determine the mean fibre fragment length as a function of applied stress. A parametric study for a carbon fibre-epoxy matrix composite shows that there is a critical applied stress below which no interfacial debonding takes place. The Poisson effect increases the interface shear stress at the debonded region towards the fibre ends, which in turn discourages further debond propagation. The mean fibre fragment length is the sum of the bonded and debonded lengths, and is substantially smaller for the composite containing fibres with a higher surface treatment level at a given applied stress greater than the critical level.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Advanced Materials Technology, Department of Mechanical & Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim, J-K. · 1993
2. 10.1016/0266-3538(91)90072-W10.1016/0266-3538(91)90072-W ↗
3. 10.1177/00219983900240020510.1177/002199839002400205 ↗
4. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.75010040510.1002/pc.750100405 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0072648610.1007/BF00726486 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.1978.07022111510.1002/app.1978.070221115 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0240265910.1007/BF02402659 ↗
9. 10.1177/00219983920260040710.1177/002199839202600407 ↗
10. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90061-710.1016/0266-3538(92)90061-7 ↗
11. 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/30210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
12. 10.1520/STP24378S10.1520/STP24378S ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0054453210.1007/BF00544532 ↗
14. 10.1520/STP44699S10.1520/STP44699S ↗
15. Piggott, M. R. · 1980
16. 10.1007/BF0111600510.1007/BF01116005 ↗
17. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90037-410.1016/0266-3538(92)90037-4 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0094848810.1007/BF00948488 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0094896210.1007/BF00948962 ↗
20. Weibull, W. · J. Appl. Mech. · 1951 · 18 · 29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
21. 10.1520/JTE11131J10.1520/JTE11131J ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0036504910.1007/BF00365049 ↗
23. 23. Baillie, C. 1991. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.