AI-powered printability evaluation framework for 3D bioprinting using Hausdorff distance metrics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract 3D bioprinting enables rapid fabrication of complex biological structures for tissue engineering applications. However, optimizing bioink formulation remains challenging due to complex relationships among material properties, printability, and cell viability. While the perimeter ratio (Pr) is commonly used to evaluate printability, it cannot adequately capture the full geometric fidelity required for comprehensive printability assessments, thereby limiting robust bioink design. To address this limitation, a novel Hausdorff distance (HD) metric is employed to quantify printability, directly measuring the maximum deviation between the designed and printed structures. Furthermore, multiple machine-learning approaches were applied to alginate-hyaluronic acid composite inks and rat pheochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells to assess printability and cell viability. Rheological parameters were characterized using support vector regression (SVR) with R 2 ⩾ 0.974. Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) regressors achieved R 2 values of 0.932 and 0.945 when predicting HD values of printed grid structures and cell viability, respectively. A regression-based convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed to predict HD values directly from grid structure images, achieving an R 2 of 0.986. Through optimization, optimal as-extruded cell viability (⩾95%) was achieved while maintaining high printability (HD ⩽ 0.20). The optimal ink composition was further demonstrated with good long-term cell viability and proliferation potential. This proposed AI-integrated approach can dramatically reduce ink optimization time by rapidly predicting rheological properties, printability, and cell viability from minimal experimental data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001 ↗
2. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity10.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
3. 3D extrusion bioprinting10.1038/s43586-021-00073-8 ↗
4. Diffusion-based 3D bioprinting strategies10.1002/advs.202306470 ↗
5. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 ↗
6. 3D printing in biofabrication: from surface textures to biological engineering10.1016/j.cej.2024.156477 ↗
7. Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells10.1039/c3bm00012e ↗
8. Composite inks for extrusion printing of biological and biomedical constructs10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01158 ↗
9. Nanocomposite bioinks for 3D bioprinting10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.014 ↗
10. Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting10.1002/adhm.201901798 ↗
11. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 ↗
12. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 ↗
13. Study on printability evaluation of alginate/silk fibroin/collagen double-cross-linked inks and the properties of 3D printed constructs10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01522 ↗
14. Enhancing the performance of 3D printed bio-photoelectrochemical cells through multi-objective Bayesian optimisation10.1080/17452759.2024.2449565 ↗
15. Enhanced printability of high-viscosity chitosan/acrylamide inks via aluminum ions coordination for precision 3D bioprinting of scaffolds10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123359 ↗
16. Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/aa90e2 ↗
17. Efficiently locating objects using the Hausdorff distance10.1023/A:1007975324482 ↗
18. Reducing the Hausdorff distance in medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks10.1109/TMI.2019.2930068 ↗
19. Towards a guideline for evaluation metrics in medical image segmentation10.1186/s13104-022-06096-y ↗
20. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707 ↗
21. Machine learning reveals a general understanding of printability in formulations based on rheology additives10.1002/advs.202202638 ↗
22. Rheology-informed hierarchical machine learning model for the prediction of printing resolution in extrusion-based bioprinting10.36922/ijb.1280 ↗
23. Hierarchical machine learning for high-fidelity 3D printed biopolymers10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00755 ↗
24. Data-driven printability modeling of hydrogels for precise direct ink writing based on rheological properties10.1002/advs.202507639 ↗
25. Coupling machine learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914 ↗
26. Autonomous control of extrusion bioprinting using convolutional neural networks10.1002/adfm.202424553 ↗
27. A deep learning quality control loop of the extrusion-based bioprinting process10.18063/ijb.v8i4.620 ↗
28. A deep learning approach for error detection and quantification in extrusion-based bioprinting10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.006 ↗
29. Monitoring anomalies in 3D bioprinting with deep neural networks10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01761 ↗
30. Small data machine learning in materials science10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z ↗
31. SAM 2: segment anything in images and videos
32. Chapter 7—artificial neural networks: multilayer perceptron for ecological modeling
33. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
34. Advancing 3D bioprinting through machine learning and artificial intelligence10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00331 ↗
35. Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e ↗
36. Advantage of alginate bioinks in biofabrication for various tissue engineering applications10.1155/2023/6661452 ↗
37. Oxidized alginate-based hydrogels for tissue engineering applications: a review10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01331 ↗
38. Hyaluronic acid as a bioink for extrusion-based 3D printing10.1088/1758-5090/ab8752 ↗
39. 3D printed scaffolds based on hyaluronic acid bioinks for tissue engineering: a review10.1186/s40824-023-00460-00 ↗
40. Dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in combination with ginger extract without NGF promote neurite outgrowth and PC12 cell branching10.1016/j.envres.2023.116302 ↗
41. Flexible, biodegradable, and wireless magnetoelectric paper for simple in situ personalization of bioelectric implants10.1002/adma.202311154 ↗
42. 3D bioprinted multiscale composite scaffolds based on gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)/chitosan microspheres as a modular bioink for enhancing 3D neurite outgrowth and elongation10.1016/j.jcis.2020.04.040 ↗
43. 3D bioprinting of neural tissues10.1002/adhm.202001600 ↗
44. Machine learning-based prediction and optimisation framework for as-extruded cell viability in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting10.1080/17452759.2024.2400330 ↗
45. Modeling a dynamic printability window on polysaccharide blend inks for extrusion bioprinting10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01143 ↗
46. Processing and properties of chitosan inks for 3d printing of hydrogel microstructures10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00415 ↗
47. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.041 ↗
48. A new printable alginate/hyaluronic acid/gelatin hydrogel suitable for biofabrication of in vitro and in vivo metastatic melanoma models10.1002/adfm.202107993 ↗
49. Characterization of cell damage and proliferative ability during and after bioprinting10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00714 ↗
50. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels10.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
51. Digestion degree is a key factor to regulate the printability of pure tendon decellularized extracellular matrix bio-ink in extrusion-based 3D cell printing10.1088/1758-5090/aba411 ↗
52. Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity10.1002/adhm.201500677 ↗
53. Cell viability prediction and optimization in extrusion-based bioprinting via neural network-based Bayesian optimization models10.1088/1758-5090/ad17cf ↗
54. Biomaterials/bioinks and extrusion bioprinting10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.06.006 ↗
55. Modeling cross model non-Newtonian fluid flow in porous media10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103708 ↗
56. Green stabilization of microscale iron particles using guar gum: bulk rheology, sedimentation rate and enzymatic degradation10.1016/j.jcis.2014.01.021 ↗
57. Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks10.1088/1758-5090/aac872 ↗
58. Synthesis and characterization of both ionically and enzymatically cross-linkable alginate10.1016/j.actbio.2006.12.002 ↗
59. Phototuning of hyaluronic-acid-based hydrogel properties to control network formation in human vascular endothelial cells10.1002/adhm.202303787 ↗
60. Peroxidase-catalyzed microextrusion bioprinting of cell-laden hydrogel constructs in vaporized ppm-level hydrogen peroxide10.1088/1758-5090/aadc9e ↗