Modeling intratumor heterogeneity in breast cancer
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Reduced therapy response in breast cancer has been correlated with heterogeneity in biomarker composition, expression level, and spatial distribution of cancer cells within a patient tumor. Thus, there is a need for models to replicate cell–cell, cell–stromal, and cell–microenvironment interactions during cancer progression. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models are convenient but cannot adequately represent tumor microenvironment histological organization, in vivo 3D spatial/cellular context, and physiological relevance. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) in vitro tumor models have been shown to provide an improved platform for incorporating compositional and spatial heterogeneity and to better mimic the biological characteristics of patient tumors to assess drug response. Advances in 3D bioprinting have allowed the creation of more complex models with improved physiologic representation while controlling for reproducibility and accuracy. This review aims to summarize the advantages and challenges of current 3D in vitro models for evaluating therapy response in breast cancer, with a particular emphasis on 3D bioprinting, and addresses several key issues for future model development as well as their application to other cancers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Breast Cancer Treatment Studies · Cancer Cells and Metastasis · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Breast cancer as an example of tumour heterogeneity and tumour cell plasticity during malignant progression10.1038/s41416-021-01328-7 ↗
2. Cancer statistics, 202310.3322/caac.21763 ↗
3. Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture models in drug discovery and drug repositioning10.3389/fphar.2018.00006 ↗
4. In vitro human cell line models to predict clinical response to anticancer drugs10.2217/pgs.14.170 ↗
5. Modeling chemical effects on breast cancer: the importance of the microenvironment in vitro10.1093/intbio/zyaa002 ↗
6. The tumor microenvironment is a dominant force in multidrug resistance10.1016/j.drup.2012.01.006 ↗
7. Comparison of 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in breast cancer10.3892/or.2015.3767 ↗
8. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours10.1038/35021093 ↗
9. Molecular biology in breast cancer: intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.11.005 ↗
10. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications10.1073/pnas.191367098 ↗
11. PCA-PAM50 improves consistency between breast cancer intrinsic and clinical subtyping reclassifying a subset of luminal A tumors as luminal B10.1038/s41598-019-44339-4 ↗
12. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer10.1186/bcr2635 ↗
13. Molecular characterization of basal-like and non-basal-like triple-negative breast cancer10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0397 ↗
14. Re-definition of claudin-low as a breast cancer phenotype10.1038/s41467-020-15574-5 ↗
15. Molecular drivers of oncotype DX, prosigna, endopredict, and the breast cancer index: a TransATAC study10.1200/JCO.20.00853 ↗
16. Gene expression profiling of breast cancer10.1016/j.yasu.2008.03.002 ↗
17. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.412 ↗
18. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on The Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 201310.1093/annonc/mdt303 ↗
19. The updated landscape of tumor microenvironment and drug repurposing10.1038/s41392-020-00280-x ↗
20. The immune landscape of cancer10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.023 ↗
21. Immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer: beyond checkpoint inhibitors10.1038/s41523-022-00486-y ↗
22. Immunotherapy in breast cancer: an overview of current strategies and perspectives10.1038/s41523-023-00508-3 ↗
23. Development and validation for research assessment of oncotype DX® breast recurrence score, EndoPredict® and Prosigna®10.1038/s41523-021-00216-w ↗
24. Molecular Heterogeneity and Evolution in Breast Cancer10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-060220-014137 ↗
25. Targeting the heterogeneous genomic landscape in triple-negative breast cancer through inhibitors of the transcriptional machinery10.3390/cancers14184353 ↗
26. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: american society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update10.5858/arpa.2018-0902-SA ↗
27. human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: american society of clinical oncology–college of american pathologists guideline update10.5858/arpa.2023-0950-SA ↗
28. T-DXd: new standard for HER2-low breast cancer10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2022-0043 ↗
29. Impact of HER2 heterogeneity on treatment response of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1557 ↗
30. Roche receives FDA approval for first companion diagnostic to identify patients with HER2 low metastatic breast cancer eligible for Enhertu
31. Clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of individual patient data from four prospective, neoadjuvant clinical trials10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00301-6 ↗
32. HELENA: HER2-Low as a prEdictive factor of response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eArly breast cancer10.1186/s12885-022-10163-9 ↗
33. Current biological, pathological and clinical landscape of HER2-low breast cancer10.3390/cancers15010126 ↗
34. Personalised therapies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: when target is not everything10.3390/cancers14153729 ↗
35. Breaking barriers in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)—Unleashing the power of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102672 ↗
36. Triple negative breast cancer treatment options and limitations: future outlook10.3390/pharmaceutics15071796 ↗
37. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer10.1056/NEJMoa1910549 ↗
38. Atezolizumab for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer10.1080/13543784.2019.1552255 ↗
39. PARP inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer10.1007/s40262-017-0587-4 ↗
40. Metabolic crosstalk in the breast cancer microenvironment10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.002 ↗
41. Transition to invasive breast cancer is associated with progressive changes in the structure and composition of tumor stroma10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.023 ↗
42. Mapping breast cancer microenvironment through single-cell omics10.3389/fimmu.2022.868813 ↗
43. A single-cell and spatially resolved atlas of human breast cancers10.1038/s41588-021-00911-1 ↗
44. histoCAT: analysis of cell phenotypes and interactions in multiplex image cytometry data10.1038/nmeth.4391 ↗
45. Cell-cell communication in the tumor microenvironment, carcinogenesis, and anticancer treatment10.1159/000362978 ↗
46. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 ↗
47. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059 ↗
48. Understanding and overcoming tumor heterogeneity in metastatic breast cancer treatment10.1038/s43018-021-00229-1 ↗
49. Mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer10.1038/s41416-019-0635-y ↗
50. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition programs and cancer stem cell phenotypes: mediators of breast cancer therapy resistance10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0067 ↗
51. Intrinsic resistance to chemotherapy in breast cancer10.2217/WHE.10.60 ↗
52. Apoptosis deregulation and the development of cancer multi-drug resistance10.3390/cancers13174363 ↗
53. Breast cancer: molecular mechanisms of underlying resistance and therapeutic approaches
54. Cellular mechanisms underlying response and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer10.1186/s13058-022-01510-6 ↗
55. ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer10.1186/s13058-021-01462-3 ↗
56. Apoptosis resistance in epithelial tumors is mediated by tumor-cell-derived interleukin-410.1038/sj.cdd.4402305 ↗
57. The mechanisms of multidrug resistance of breast cancer and research progress on related reversal agents10.1016/j.bmc.2023.117486 ↗
58. Oncogenic signaling in tumorigenesis and applications of siRNA nanotherapeutics in breast cancer10.3390/cancers11050632 ↗
59. Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.012 ↗
60. Development of multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS) culture from breast cancer cell and a high throughput screening method using the MTT assay10.1371/journal.pone.0044640 ↗
61. Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: focus on tumor spheroid model10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.03.013 ↗
62. Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types10.1002/bit.10655 ↗
63. A simple hanging drop cell culture protocol for generation of 3D spheroids10.3791/2720 ↗
64. Evaluation of chemotherapeutics in a three-dimensional breast cancer model10.1007/s00432-015-1950-1 ↗
65. In vitro evaluation of curcumin effects on breast adenocarcinoma 2D and 3D cell cultures
66. Distinctive alterations of invasiveness, drug resistance and cell-cell organization in 3D-cultures of MCF-7, a human breast cancer cell line, and its multidrug resistant variant10.1023/a:1014594825502 ↗
67. ATR mediates cisplatin resistance in 3D-cultured breast cancer cells via translesion DNA synthesis modulation10.1038/s41419-019-1689-8 ↗
68. Modeling tumor cell adaptations to hypoxia in multicellular tumor spheroids10.1186/s13046-017-0570-9 ↗
69. HER2 signaling pathway activation and response of breast cancer cells to HER2-targeting agents is dependent strongly on the 3D microenvironment10.1007/s10549-009-0502-2 ↗
70. Changes in global gene expression associated with 3D structure of tumors: an ex vivo matrix-free mesothelioma spheroid model10.1371/journal.pone.0039556 ↗
71. Opportunities and challenges for use of tumor spheroids as models to test drug delivery and efficacy10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.045 ↗
72. Sophorolipid candidates demonstrate cytotoxic efficacy against 2D and 3D breast cancer models10.1021/acs.jnatprod.2c00804 ↗
73. Molecularly engineered surfactin analogues induce nonapoptotic-like cell death and increased selectivity in multiple breast cancer cell types10.1021/acsomega.3c00454 ↗
74. 3-D individual cell based computational modeling of tumor cell-macrophage paracrine signaling mediated by EGF and CSF-1 gradients10.1039/c5ib00201j ↗
75. Activity-driven tissue alignment in proliferating spheroids10.1039/D2SM01239A ↗
76. The ECM: to scaffold, or not to scaffold, that is the question10.3390/ijms222312690 ↗
77. The synergy of scaffold-based and scaffold-free tissue engineering strategies10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.01.005 ↗
78. DMT1-dependent endosome-mitochondria interactions regulate mitochondrial iron translocation and metastatic outgrowth10.1038/s41388-023-02933-x ↗
79. Non-destructive tumor aggregate morphology and viability quantification at cellular resolution, during development and in response to drug10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.042 ↗
80. Non-destructive evaluation of regional cell density within tumor aggregates following drug treatment10.3791/64030 ↗
81. Challenges of applying multicellular tumor spheroids in preclinical phase10.1186/s12935-021-01853-8 ↗
82. Synthetic alternatives to matrigel10.1038/s41578-020-0199-8 ↗
83. Organoids in cancer research10.1038/s41568-018-0007-6 ↗
84. The organoid cell atlas10.1038/s41587-020-00762-x ↗
85. Progress in the application of organoids to breast cancer research10.1111/jcmm.15216 ↗
86. A path to translation: how 3D patient tumor avatars enable next generation precision oncology10.1016/j.ccell.2022.09.017 ↗
87. A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation10.1038/s41591-019-0584-2 ↗
88. Tumor organoids as a pre-clinical cancer model for drug discovery10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.06.012 ↗
89. Organoids to study immune functions, immunological diseases and immunotherapy10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.027 ↗
90. Organoid models of tumor immunology10.1016/j.it.2020.06.010 ↗
91. Development of primary human pancreatic cancer organoids, matched stromal and immune cells and 3D tumor microenvironment models10.1186/s12885-018-4238-4 ↗
92. A 3D fibroblast-epithelium co-culture model for understanding microenvironmental role in branching morphogenesis of the mammary gland10.1007/978-1-4939-6475-8_10 ↗
93. Analysis of immune cells from human mammary ductal epithelial organoids reveals Vδ2+ T cells that efficiently target breast carcinoma cells in the presence of bisphosphonate10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0370-T ↗
94. Organoid co-culture methods to capture cancer cell–natural killer cell interactions10.1007/978-1-0716-2160-8_17 ↗
95. A novel gastric spheroid Co-culture model reveals chemokine-dependent recruitment of human dendritic cells to the gastric epithelium10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.02.010 ↗
96. Murine- and human-derived autologous organoid/immune cell co-cultures as pre-clinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma10.3390/cancers12123816 ↗
97. Immuno-reactive cancer organoid model to assess effects of the microbiome on cancer immunotherapy10.1038/s41598-022-13930-7 ↗
98. Programmed synthesis of three-dimensional tissues10.1038/nmeth.3553 ↗
99. Challenges of organoid research10.1146/annurev-neuro-111020-090812 ↗
100. Towards organoid culture without matrigel10.1038/s42003-021-02910-8 ↗