The effect of equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) on the properties of graphene reinforced aluminium matrix composites
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present study, graphene nanosheets were synthesised by liquid phase exfoliation process, and the obtained graphene was reinforced in the rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.6 wt.%. After the composites were characterised, they were exposed to Equal Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP) process. While 0.1 wt.% and 0.2 wt.% graphene reinforced composite samples successfully completed the ECAP process, 0.1 wt.% and 0.2 wt.% graphene reinforced composite samples were broken during the ECAP process. Electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of the composite increased with the increased amount of graphene. The mechanical properties of ECAP-processed samples showed significant increases compared to non-ECAP processed samples. To figure out the effect of the ECAP process, moulds with different channel angles were used, the ECAP temperature was changed, and different passes were performed and the angles of 120° and 90° were used. ECAP-processed samples in both mould angles showed similar mechanical properties. With the increasing ECAP temperature, the mechanical properties of the sample decreased, but its electrical conductivity increased. As the number of passes increased, mechanical properties increased and crack formation in material increased. In addition, it was not possible to successfully remove the matrix composites containing more than 0.3 wt.% graphene from the ECAP process. Especially in the sample containing 0.6 wt.% graphene, brittle fractures were seen during the ECAP process and the sample was divided into many parts. The results showed that the composite responded better to the ECAP process when low amounts of graphene were reinforced in the al matrix. Significant improvements were observed in the properties of these composites after the ECAP process. In this study, the properties of composites with and without ECAP process were extensively investigated. The results were compared in detail with the previous studies. The graphene was produced using a simple method and it was reinforced with the Al matrix with the easiest possible method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Metalurgical and Material Engineering Dept., Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
Physics Dept., Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
Metalurgical and Material Engineering. Dept., Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
Funding
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. In: Nanoscience and technology: a collection of reviews from nature journals . Singapore: World Scientific, 2010, pp.11–19.10.1142/9789814287005_0002 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.11340510.1103/PhysRevB.80.113405 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12613-016-1286-010.1007/s12613-016-1286-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.012 ↗
5. 10.1038/nnano.2009.5810.1038/nnano.2009.58 ↗
6. 10.1021/jp208575m10.1021/jp208575m ↗
7. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.11.00510.1016/j.materresbull.2010.11.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 ↗
9. 10.1002/tcr.20090000810.1002/tcr.200900008 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl802412n10.1021/nl802412n ↗
11. 10.1021/nn900728d10.1021/nn900728d ↗
12. 10.1021/nl802558y10.1021/nl802558y ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.08610.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.086 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.03410.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.034 ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat239210.1038/nmat2392 ↗
16. 10.1109/TNANO.2009.201362010.1109/TNANO.2009.2013620 ↗
17. 10.1080/1536383X.2015.111447210.1080/1536383X.2015.1114472 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.00410.1016/j.cej.2014.04.004 ↗
19. 10.1080/1536383X.2016.124453110.1080/1536383X.2016.1244531 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12034-018-1703-210.1007/s12034-018-1703-2 ↗
21. 10.1038/nnano.2014.22910.1038/nnano.2014.229 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.08.01910.1016/j.mattod.2014.08.019 ↗
23. 10.1039/C3CS60217F10.1039/C3CS60217F ↗
24. 10.1039/c1nr10127g10.1039/c1nr10127g ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0054444810.1007/BF00544448 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.31410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.314 ↗
27. 10.3139/120.11061510.3139/120.110615 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.26810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.268 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.03.01210.1016/j.pnsc.2014.03.012 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.043 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.04310.1016/j.msea.2011.07.043 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.10210.1016/j.msea.2014.12.102 ↗
33. 10.1080/10426914.2012.66788910.1080/10426914.2012.667889 ↗
34. 10.1002/adem.20140037510.1002/adem.201400375 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.05510.1016/j.msea.2011.08.055 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.13010.1016/j.msea.2018.01.130 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.04410.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.044 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.02210.1016/j.msea.2010.08.022 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.47310.1016/j.msea.2006.02.473 ↗
40. Anjum N · Nucleus · 2015 · 52 · 169
41. 10.1007/s11837-000-0128-710.1007/s11837-000-0128-7 ↗
42. 10.1023/A:101793241704310.1023/A:1017932417043 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00978-310.1016/S0921-5093(00)00978-3 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.02710.1016/j.msea.2016.06.027 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00750-310.1016/S0921-5093(98)00750-3 ↗
46. Valiev R · Rev Adv Mater Sci · 2006 · 13 · 15
47. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00494-110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00494-1 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01716-610.1016/S0921-5093(01)01716-6 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
50. 10.1179/02670830010150709110.1179/026708300101507091 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00100-610.1016/S1359-6454(97)00100-6 ↗
52. 10.1039/c2ra21316h10.1039/c2ra21316h ↗
53. 10.1021/cm300382b10.1021/cm300382b ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.20543310.1103/PhysRevB.79.205433 ↗
55. Childres I · New Dev Photon Mater Res · 2013 · 1 · 1
56. 10.1063/1.486659510.1063/1.4866595 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.supflu.2012.01.00210.1016/j.supflu.2012.01.002 ↗
58. 10.1039/c0cc02688c10.1039/c0cc02688c ↗
59. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.01610.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.016 ↗
60. 10.3390/nano908107010.3390/nano9081070 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.11.01010.1016/j.jallcom.2007.11.010 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.04710.1016/j.msea.2007.04.047 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11661-998-0102-510.1007/s11661-998-0102-5 ↗
64. 10.1007/s12666-019-01715-y10.1007/s12666-019-01715-y ↗
65. Saravanan S · J Eng Mater Technol · 2015 · 137
66. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.899.30510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.899.305 ↗
67. 10.1007/s12666-015-0780-910.1007/s12666-015-0780-9 ↗
68. Tabandeh-Khorshid M · Eng Sci Technol · 2016 · 19 · 463
69. Ö Güler and E Evin. The investigation of contact performance of oxide reinforced copper composite via mechanical alloying. Journal of materials processing technology 2009; 209: 1286–1290.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.034 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.01710.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.017 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.08410.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.084 ↗
72. 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00285-110.1016/S0008-6223(98)00285-1 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.05210.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.052 ↗
74. Ghazaly A, Seif B, Salem H. Mechanical and tribological properties of AA2124-graphene self lubricating nanocomposite. In: Sadler B (ed) Light metals 2013. Springer, 2016, pp.411–415.10.1007/978-3-319-65136-1_71 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.13310.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.133 ↗
76. 10.1007/s12034-015-1001-110.1007/s12034-015-1001-1 ↗
77. 10.3390/technologies501000410.3390/technologies5010004 ↗
78. 10.3390/met802011310.3390/met8020113 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.01410.1016/j.wear.2008.02.014 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.00110.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.001 ↗
81. Thiyaneshwaran N · Int J Eng Res Technol · 2013 · 17
82. 10.1088/2053-1591/aaab0810.1088/2053-1591/aaab08 ↗
83. 10.1007/s10853-010-4862-010.1007/s10853-010-4862-0 ↗
84. 10.1007/s11665-016-1888-810.1007/s11665-016-1888-8 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.11.11610.1016/j.mspro.2015.11.116 ↗