Viscoelastic and mechanical behavior of the thermoset composite interleaved with electrospun polybutadiene
Source abstract
Abstract
This work aims the processing of multifunctional thermoset composites, consisting of carbon fibers/epoxy resin prepreg, and polybutadiene (BR) mats produced via electrospinning process aiming to provide a composite material with high tenacity. Initially, polybutadiene mats were produced by electrospinning. These mats and prepregs materials were hot compressed at eight different configurations to produce the composites. The quality of the manufactured composites was evaluated by acid digestion, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), acoustic ultrasound inspection, impulse excitation, and impact resistance tests. The composites with six layers of electrospun BR showed higher storage modulus value (DMA test), and no significant change was observed in its energy absorption values of impact resistance test. However, it was possible to verify that the presence of the BR mats in the composites hindered the propagation of damage in the material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
São Paulo State University (UNESP)
Volkswagen in the Brazil
Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP)
LEL/IPT
Forza Composites
Funding
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development · São Paulo Foundation Research · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brazil
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10443-007-9041-310.1007/s10443-007-9041-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00080-410.1016/S0008-6223(00)00080-4 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.1133510.1002/app.11335 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.05010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.050 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11684510.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116845 ↗
6. Maccaferri E, Mazzocchetti L, Benelli T, et al. Rubbery-Modified CFRPs with Improved Mode I Fracture Toughness : Effect of Nanofibrous Mat Grammage and Positioning on Tan δ Behaviour. Polymers. 2021; 13(12): 1918.
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.09110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.091 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.043 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11183510.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111835 ↗
10. 10.1080/1023666X.2024.239921910.1080/1023666X.2024.2399219 ↗
11. 10.1007/s13399-022-03203-810.1007/s13399-022-03203-8 ↗
12. 10.37358/MP.21.2.548210.37358/MP.21.2.5482 ↗
13. 10.1080/15440478.2022.203628810.1080/15440478.2022.2036288 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2706610.1002/pc.27066 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5TB00239G10.1039/C5TB00239G ↗
16. Liu H, Hsieh H, Chen J, et al. Fabrication and application of highly stretchable conductive fiber-based electrode of epoxy/NBR electrospun. Fibers Spray-Coated AgNW/PU Compos 2019; 1800387: 1–8.
17. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.02210.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.022 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.04.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.04.010 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.00210.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.08910.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.089 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.10810.1016/j.snb.2015.12.108 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.06.00610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.06.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.04.02110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.04.021 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.06510.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.065 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.10310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.103 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10821010.1016/j.matdes.2019.108210 ↗
27. Gürbüz R Ozcan A. Thermomechanical and Structural Characterization of Polybutadiene / Poly ( Ethylene Oxide )/ CNT Stretchable Electrospun Fibrous Membranes. 2021 No. July 2020 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.508010.1002/pat.5080 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11422810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114228 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.020 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.3238810.1002/app.32388 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.05.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.05.003 ↗
32. 10.1590/S1678-5878200800030000610.1590/S1678-58782008000300006 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10497610.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104976 ↗
34. Safri A, Sultan MTH, Jawaid M, et al. Impact behaviour of hybrid composites for structural applications: a review. A Review 2018; 133: 112–121.
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.09910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.099 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.023 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.07.07910.1016/j.electacta.2014.07.079 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.02910.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.029 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.10.01410.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.10.014 ↗
40. 10.5028/jatm.v9i2.65710.5028/jatm.v9i2.657 ↗
41. Montoro R, Hil MO, Uma R. EM COMPÓSITOS NCF / RTM6 PROCESSADOS VIA RTM. RETEC, Ourinhos, 2015, pp. 17–23.
42. Method ST. Standard test method for dynamic young’s modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio by impulse excitation of vibration 1, 2022, vol. 81.
43. D7136. A. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. ASTM Int Des D 2005; i(C): 1–16.