Investigation of the hydrodynamic response of cells in drop on demand piezoelectric inkjet nozzles
Source abstract
Abstract
Cell motion within a liquid suspension inside a piezoelectrically actuated, cylindrical inkjet printhead was studied using high speed imaging and a low depth of field setup. For each ejected droplet, a cell within the inkjet nozzle was observed to exhibit one of three possible behaviors which are termed: cell travel, cell ejection and cell reflection. Cell reflection is an undesirable phenomenon which may adversely affect an inkjet's capability in dispensing cells and a possible reason why it was previously reported that the rate of cells dispensed did not follow the expected Poisson distribution. Through the study of the cells motions, it was hypothesized that the rheological properties of the media in the cell suspension play an important role in influencing the cell behaviors exhibited. This was experimentally studied with the tracking of cells within the inkjet nozzle in a 10% w/v Ficoll PM400 cell suspension. The effect of cell reflection was eliminated using the higher density and viscosity Ficoll PM400 suspension. The presented work is the first in-depth study of the cell behaviors occurring within a piezoelectric inkjet nozzle during the printing process. The understanding of the hydrodynamics during a droplet ejection and its effect on the suspended cells are imperative towards achieving reliable cell dispensing for biofabrication applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/biot.20060008110.1002/biot.200600081 ↗
2. 10.1109/MHS.2008.475249510.1109/MHS.2008.4752495 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.04710.1016/j.msec.2006.05.047 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.290306410.1115/1.2903064 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.052 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.005 ↗
7. Lorber B · Biofabrication · 2014 · 610.1088/1758-5082/6/1/015001 ↗
8. Mironov V · Biofabrication · 2009 · 110.1088/1758-5082/1/2/022001 ↗
9. Martin G D · J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2008 · 10510.1088/1742-6596/105/1/012001 ↗
10. 10.1021/cc010075e10.1021/cc010075e ↗
11. Magdassi S · The Chemistry of Inkjet Inks · 200910.1142/6869 ↗
12. Li E Q · 2013
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.032 ↗
15. 10.1039/b704965j10.1039/b704965j ↗
16. 10.1039/c2lc40523g10.1039/c2lc40523g ↗
17. 10.1021/co100061c10.1021/co100061c ↗
18. 10.1371/journal.pone.002158010.1371/journal.pone.0021580 ↗
19. 10.1002/bit.2456210.1002/bit.24562 ↗
20. Cheng E · Investigation of the Hydrodynamics of Suspended Cells for Reliable Inkjet Cell Printing · 2014 · V001T03A010
21. Parsa S · Biofabrication · 2010 · 210.1088/1758-5082/2/2/025003 ↗
22. 10.1039/C2BM00114D10.1039/C2BM00114D ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00063-G10.1016/0022-1759(95)00063-G ↗
24. 10.4103/0973-029X.9908110.4103/0973-029X.99081 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.11.00310.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.11.003 ↗
26. Kacik D · ELEKTRO, 2014 · 2014 · 2014 · 66210.1109/ELEKTRO.2014.6848983 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.280078410.1063/1.2800784 ↗
28. 10.1006/jcis.1996.021710.1006/jcis.1996.0217 ↗
29. 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.12.56.5.05040110.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.12.56.5.050401 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.400566910.1115/1.4005669 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.188802610.1063/1.1888026 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10404-015-1589-x10.1007/s10404-015-1589-x ↗
33. Melling A · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 1997 · 8 · 140610.1088/0957-0233/8/12/005 ↗
34. Cameron T · Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics