Mesoscale modeling of ultra-thin woven fabric composite subjected to in-plane loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultra-light composites are produced through the spread tow technology. The success of spread tow fabrics lies in their unique woven structure. By interlacing widespread thin flat tapes, instead of regular (and thicker) yarns, more straight fibers and thinner plies are obtained which leads to improvements in the mechanical performance in terms of both stiffness and strength. The available numerical studies on spread tow fabric composites are based on the approximation to equivalent thin ply laminates, where the key observations are dedicated to a delayed or suppressed microcracking. This paper helps to investigate the limitations of considering thin-ply spread tow composites as equivalent laminates, as well as to bring more understanding on how the tow thickness affect the sequence of failure mechanisms. As an aid to these investigations, a parameterized mesoscale model has been developed that preserves the complex geometry of the woven structure and can analyze the tow thickness effect down to 35 µm. By applying shifted periodic boundary conditions through the thickness, the effect of periodic layer shifting is also analyzed without having to discretize and model more than one layer of the composite.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Material and Computational Mechanics, Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Research and Development, Gestamp Hardtech, Luleå, Sweden
Funding
Chalmers Area of Advanced Materials Science, Chalmers Sports And Technologies
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.027 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.008 ↗
4. 10.1177/00219983850190040410.1177/002199838501900404 ↗
5. 10.1080/09243046.2018.149941110.1080/09243046.2018.1499411 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.repl.2014.12.07110.1016/j.repl.2014.12.071 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11831-018-9291-210.1007/s11831-018-9291-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11192010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111920 ↗
9. 10.1177/002199831349443010.1177/0021998313494430 ↗
10. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90022-910.1016/0266-3538(93)90022-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.005 ↗
12. Cox BN, Flanagan G. Handbook of analytical methods for textile composites. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 1997 March.
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.031 ↗
14. Lomov SV · 2013
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.08210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.082 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199830606989110.1177/0021998306069891 ↗
17. 10.1080/09243046.2016.122666910.1080/09243046.2016.1226669 ↗
18. Nairn JA · 2000 · 403
19. 10.1080/09243046.2020.174086710.1080/09243046.2020.1740867 ↗
20. 10.1177/00219983870210040210.1177/002199838702100402 ↗
21. Wang ASD · Compos Technol Review 6 · 1984 · 2 · 45
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.023 ↗
23. Pinho ST, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, et al. Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linearity. NASA center for AeroSpace Information, [cited 2020 Oct 10] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050110223
24. 10.1177/002199831245447810.1177/0021998312454478 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199831349947710.1177/0021998313499477 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.023 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00155-110.1016/S1359-835X(04)00155-1 ↗
28. [cited 2020 Oct 10]. http://www.performance-composites.com/carbonfibre/mechanicalproperties_2.asp